計劃進修PhD/Research討論區 (6)

點解會咁 因為個學科已經比人玩到冇得再玩?

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

大家都係咁做

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

出返去先

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

有冇astron 巴打
ug緊想行依條路
之前留過名
個post爆得咁快追唔切

睇樓主一樓個google form

有個巴打astrophysics

sor一開睇唔到
好似係第個post 見過個巴打

巴打你想玩咩field
我都好似係邊到見過你

我興趣係cosmology 個邊

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vCjZLXBPY1p7iKz2jnviJa0YYIFlyT2pREad-CiFqtg/mobilebasic?pli=1#id.xfu0057zczmm

窮人如何讀PhD
有興趣巴絲可以睇睇

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

我諗develop 一個新model係最難

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vCjZLXBPY1p7iKz2jnviJa0YYIFlyT2pREad-CiFqtg/mobilebasic?pli=1#id.xfu0057zczmm

窮人如何讀PhD
有興趣巴絲可以睇睇

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

點解會咁 因為個學科已經比人玩到冇得再玩?

Econ peer review tough d(好似係)

我聽過人講,因為econ peer review又臭又長,所以好多時會過期

聽過一個prof present一篇文
佢話做寫呢篇文咁耐以唻 佢生左兩個仔

好奇係點produce 一篇econ 文

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

睇下現實現像, 問個問題, 先諗個intuitive答案
睇下literature有冇人答過, 有--> improve 人地?
冇-->自己按照想要的結果搞個model出黎
一邊堆一邊寫, 堆做基本上寫完main body
再睇下值唔值得再發展, 定係只係good homework exercise
後者變成grad class題目, 前者就加discussion,
加圖加公仔, 吹下alternative assumptions
Seminar/ present 說服人地呢個係個result
Submit 之後再說服referee或者跟佢地suggest改

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

因為我baseline model太低b 所以有好多人會懷疑robustness 所以我做左好多野話俾佢地知無事

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

Advisor點會同我寫

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

Advisor點會同我寫

咁你咪滿足下慾求不滿的老闆

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

Advisor點會同我寫

咁你咪滿足下慾求不滿的老闆

講起老闆, 咩老闆會係伏

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

諗起兩父子帶隻驢仔去賣

個人經驗：
有idea 睇少少literature
寫model 有基本result
同prof傾計 做extension check robustness * 30-50
睇paper 寫paper present 同prof傾計 改organization/way to sell or present * 30-50
Submit 等到天荒地老
如果reject就submit去第二度 再等幾個月
如果referee要你改野 咁你改好左再submit 再等幾個月

咁睇同psycho 寫theorectical review 差唔多
你講既寫model
要做check
咁係做simulation 定咩野？

我係做theory既
寫math model
Check robustness係relax個model既assumption
或者加一d element落去睇下個點
即係solve多個更加複雜既math model咁解

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

求救 有冇人試過玩幾萬個variable嘅regression (logistic) model selection
太多variable唔知點handle overfit問題好嚴重

做PCA or SVD

出返去先

唔好拜 要做咁多robustness check即係代表本身個model低b

對從來未切過呢啲model，將來亦都唔會夠班切都嘅人嚟講，你做到已經係神人嚟

要識sell
唔係relax assumptions/ extend model, 而係propose a model/ develop a new model

諗點sell真係難到閪
依加最閪係我advisor覺得我應該加個section講cognitive psycho theory
但psycho literature都無一個統一 或者比較完整既theory
即係我要寫番篇psycho文 ？

一個section, 照加啦, 要grad同搵工最後advisor簽你過
可以試下relate and discuss就算
我second advisor一直都嘈要加, 我加左, 後尾referee話個section係"deal with previous referee's off-target comment"要我成段delete左
過左海就係神仙，除非你同你advisor一齊寫。

Advisor點會同我寫

咁你咪滿足下慾求不滿的老闆

講起老闆, 咩老闆會係伏

我以前學校個個都ok, 冇咩伏位
聽過其他U有小器精, control freak, 唔見人etc...