[Welcome Flick] 車路士球迷討論區
Jackdorsey
1001 回覆
6 Like
3 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
多謝杜sir開頭嗰10分
早啲訓係床翻身仲易過佢下個月比人炒
聽朝訓醒有club statement先有機會翻身
聽話，太監係咁上下
睇左咁多年都未試過咁想換領隊
拎油王同呢啲人嚟比
最明顯例子：鏝油王想球會成功，做sport washing；熱狗個閪人班主為錢
最明顯例子：鏝油王想球會成功，做sport washing；熱狗個閪人班主為錢
林狗嗰陣都冇咁廢
衰過干地焦土嗰季
大絕：最衰杜sir季初買羊
AZP會唔會面部骨折
屌你咩林狗…
林sir 頭季打士氣波其實好屈，係咁入波，但又係咁失波
杜狗除咗唔要C朗要美羊之外仲做錯咩
林sir起碼第一季前四
干焦土都拎過冠軍
摩16都贏過幾年
樸乜柒都冇，form又冇，控球又冇，又唔係打防反，連攻門都冇
條撚樣淨係識場邊拍手做啦啦隊
炒撚咗佢買個包箱比佢坐上去慢慢拍啦
干焦土都拎過冠軍
摩16都贏過幾年
樸乜柒都冇，form又冇，控球又冇，又唔係打防反，連攻門都冇
條撚樣淨係識場邊拍手做啦啦隊
炒撚咗佢買個包箱比佢坐上去慢慢拍啦
呢方面幾欣賞佢
幾撚輕鬆
幾撚輕鬆
其實睇獌就知
支出好似好多又贏唔到啲乜
買人都算貴
但實際格拉沙一直有錢賺
支出好似好多又贏唔到啲乜
買人都算貴
但實際格拉沙一直有錢賺
錯在冇諗過個班主真係癡鳩線夏天淨係補咗最嚴重嘅後防同前線就算數唔追埋中場
How much would it cost Chelsea to sack Graham Potter?
For Chelsea to buy out the remainder of his deal, then, would cost somewhere in the region of £44-52m.
On top of this, it is likely that they would wish to pay off at least some of his staff.
Is FFP saving Potter from the Chelsea sack?
Ironically, Chelsea’s big spending, which is being used as a stick to beat him with by supporters, may actually be buying Potter time in the job.
The Blues are clearly walking a thin line in terms of Financial Fair Play (FFP), which they have navigated by giving players long contracts that can be amortised over a prolonged period.
Giving Potter a large lump-sum payoff, though, would go down as a huge accounting loss in this year and may unbalance their delicate plan.
This could be one reason why the Chelsea manager is getting so long to turn things around.
https://www.footballtransfers.com/en/transfer-news/uk-premier-league/2023/02/how-much-would-it-cost-chelsea-to-sack-graham-potter/amp
買人買到有機會過唔到FFP
等球會出唔起50M解約金 就唔洗驚俾人炒
波特蛇真戰術大師
For Chelsea to buy out the remainder of his deal, then, would cost somewhere in the region of £44-52m.
On top of this, it is likely that they would wish to pay off at least some of his staff.
Is FFP saving Potter from the Chelsea sack?
Ironically, Chelsea’s big spending, which is being used as a stick to beat him with by supporters, may actually be buying Potter time in the job.
The Blues are clearly walking a thin line in terms of Financial Fair Play (FFP), which they have navigated by giving players long contracts that can be amortised over a prolonged period.
Giving Potter a large lump-sum payoff, though, would go down as a huge accounting loss in this year and may unbalance their delicate plan.
This could be one reason why the Chelsea manager is getting so long to turn things around.
https://www.footballtransfers.com/en/transfer-news/uk-premier-league/2023/02/how-much-would-it-cost-chelsea-to-sack-graham-potter/amp
買人買到有機會過唔到FFP
等球會出唔起50M解約金 就唔洗驚俾人炒
波特蛇真戰術大師
中遊球隊級係咁上下
樸狗無戰術都算，臨場調動仲要係on9，MM無掂波唔換，細火 Noi 帶波最多反而換先，下半場250同捷好生，又轉陣打返3後衛，出梅又要250去返右邊，玩死自己隊波
黑記
問佢買唔買前鋒
佢又話唔要
臨尾又要黑羊
問佢要唔要中場又話唔要
臨尾又話買
問佢要咩人十問九唔應
開會唔出現
搵經理人代佢開會
好似大致係咁
問佢買唔買前鋒
佢又話唔要
臨尾又要黑羊
問佢要唔要中場又話唔要
臨尾又話買
問佢要咩人十問九唔應
開會唔出現
搵經理人代佢開會
好似大致係咁
鈕打十個d反擊多到
格拉沙就係玩財技
我就信todd財團係想玩branding
我就信todd財團係想玩branding