即影即有貼相 / 集中討論post (５)

今日行過logon睇左老母部wide
哇大部到膠到
睇黎富士系嘅機得Leica 個部屌得過

LOMO機個手感好土炮
leica都係成舊膠....不過有紅點o者....
我fuji 500af都勉強接受到
最好就fuji fp-1

今日行過logon睇左老母部wide
哇大部到膠到
睇黎富士系嘅機得Leica 個部屌得過

LOMO機個手感好土炮
leica都係成舊膠....不過有紅點o者....
我fuji 500af都勉強接受到
最好就fuji fp-1

個型號好熟口面

伸手黨又出現
我想買部SX70, 但google之下見原來好多版本
如果買買邊隻版本好?

感覺：愈早期愈好
使用：愈後期愈好

我最鍾意alpha 1
有裂像對焦同腳架洞

第一代sx-70 係磨沙對焦同冇腳架洞

model 2 cheap雞版sx-70

model 3估焦不了 (最cheap雞版sx-70)

之後就sonar有自動對無但多左舊野好長+樣衰
再之後就680 690 多埋支閃, 再長d, 成條野咁

仲有部mint....slr670m
硬改機有得手動快門都好正
但5000幾蚊

今日行過logon睇左老母部wide
哇大部到膠到
睇黎富士系嘅機得Leica 個部屌得過

LOMO機個手感好土炮
leica都係成舊膠....不過有紅點o者....
我fuji 500af都勉強接受到
最好就fuji fp-1

fuji fp-1係我中學時期既dream機之一

又閉左兩張packfilm，隻色真係J死人

伸手黨又出現
我想買部SX70, 但google之下見原來好多版本
如果買買邊隻版本好?

感覺：愈早期愈好
使用：愈後期愈好

我最鍾意alpha 1
有裂像對焦同腳架洞

第一代sx-70 係磨沙對焦同冇腳架洞

model 2 cheap雞版sx-70

model 3估焦不了 (最cheap雞版sx-70)

之後就sonar有自動對無但多左舊野好長+樣衰
再之後就680 690 多埋支閃, 再長d, 成條野咁

alpha1外國會貴
我部尖機冇兩叉野唔洗諗

一代磨砂/裂像我都有
m2幾好呀 不過爛皮就
m3以前有不過後來有人儲就過左俾人

sonar親手整返好一部
勁鍾意歐版荔枝皮
可以用來磨手指d枕
諗起都爽

680,690我都冇嘞
已窮

今日行過logon睇左老母部wide
哇大部到膠到
睇黎富士系嘅機得Leica 個部屌得過

LOMO機個手感好土炮
leica都係成舊膠....不過有紅點o者....
我fuji 500af都勉強接受到
最好就fuji fp-1

fuji fp-1係我中學時期既dream機之一

唔平喎
不過個設計靚

伸手黨又出現
我想買部SX70, 但google之下見原來好多版本
如果買買邊隻版本好?

感覺：愈早期愈好
使用：愈後期愈好

我最鍾意alpha 1
有裂像對焦同腳架洞

第一代sx-70 係磨沙對焦同冇腳架洞

model 2 cheap雞版sx-70

model 3估焦不了 (最cheap雞版sx-70)

之後就sonar有自動對無但多左舊野好長+樣衰
再之後就680 690 多埋支閃, 再長d, 成條野咁

alpha1外國會貴
我部尖機冇兩叉野唔洗諗

一代磨砂/裂像我都有
m2幾好呀 不過爛皮就
m3以前有不過後來有人儲就過左俾人

sonar親手整返好一部
勁鍾意歐版荔枝皮
可以用來磨手指d枕
諗起都爽

680,690我都冇嘞
已窮

我有部690, 但成日驚拎出街整爛
長擺防潮箱

伸手黨又出現
我想買部SX70, 但google之下見原來好多版本
如果買買邊隻版本好?

感覺：愈早期愈好
使用：愈後期愈好

我最鍾意alpha 1
有裂像對焦同腳架洞

第一代sx-70 係磨沙對焦同冇腳架洞

model 2 cheap雞版sx-70

model 3估焦不了 (最cheap雞版sx-70)

之後就sonar有自動對無但多左舊野好長+樣衰
再之後就680 690 多埋支閃, 再長d, 成條野咁

alpha1外國會貴
我部尖機冇兩叉野唔洗諗

一代磨砂/裂像我都有
m2幾好呀 不過爛皮就
m3以前有不過後來有人儲就過左俾人

sonar親手整返好一部
勁鍾意歐版荔枝皮
可以用來磨手指d枕
諗起都爽

680,690我都冇嘞
已窮

我有部690, 但成日驚拎出街整爛
長擺防潮箱

alpha 1 大概幾錢叫做正常?

伸手黨又出現
我想買部SX70, 但google之下見原來好多版本
如果買買邊隻版本好?

感覺：愈早期愈好
使用：愈後期愈好

我最鍾意alpha 1
有裂像對焦同腳架洞

第一代sx-70 係磨沙對焦同冇腳架洞

model 2 cheap雞版sx-70

model 3估焦不了 (最cheap雞版sx-70)

之後就sonar有自動對無但多左舊野好長+樣衰
再之後就680 690 多埋支閃, 再長d, 成條野咁

alpha1外國會貴
我部尖機冇兩叉野唔洗諗

一代磨砂/裂像我都有
m2幾好呀 不過爛皮就
m3以前有不過後來有人儲就過左俾人

sonar親手整返好一部
勁鍾意歐版荔枝皮
可以用來磨手指d枕
諗起都爽

680,690我都冇嘞
已窮

我有部690, 但成日驚拎出街整爛
長擺防潮箱

alpha 1 大概幾錢叫做正常?

外國幾乎過千 as is 碰運氣
黑店都係碰運氣有壞保唔保你都係俾錢
樣好1500-1600卦
網上見親都係中環黑店

我自己果架都神神地
但影就冇事

伸手黨又出現
我想買部SX70, 但google之下見原來好多版本
如果買買邊隻版本好?

感覺：愈早期愈好
使用：愈後期愈好

我最鍾意alpha 1
有裂像對焦同腳架洞

第一代sx-70 係磨沙對焦同冇腳架洞

model 2 cheap雞版sx-70

model 3估焦不了 (最cheap雞版sx-70)

之後就sonar有自動對無但多左舊野好長+樣衰
再之後就680 690 多埋支閃, 再長d, 成條野咁

alpha1外國會貴
我部尖機冇兩叉野唔洗諗

一代磨砂/裂像我都有
m2幾好呀 不過爛皮就
m3以前有不過後來有人儲就過左俾人

sonar親手整返好一部
勁鍾意歐版荔枝皮
可以用來磨手指d枕
諗起都爽

680,690我都冇嘞
已窮

我有部690, 但成日驚拎出街整爛
長擺防潮箱

alpha 1 大概幾錢叫做正常?

外國幾乎過千 as is 碰運氣
黑店都係碰運氣有壞保唔保你都係俾錢

網上樣好1500-1600卦
網上見親都係中環黑店

我自己果架都神神地
但影就冇事

off topic 一下有冇人收 SQ10 同mini 90 neo classic

富士出 SP-3 print instax square
可恥！

即變手機台

以後無人認真研究點影即影即有

收到風寶麗來告我賤

收到風寶麗來告我賤

告乜？

富士出 SP-3 print instax square
可恥！

即變手機台

以後無人認真研究點影即影即有

咁我覺得家家有求
好似另post搵機嘅巴打

如果要唔fail 儲存媒介冇所謂
最緊要有相的話
梗係用相紙印好啦

canon相紙都十幾年啦我諗
唔差過（好好多其實）寶麗來或富士

果時canon展覽我都有去試
宜家睇返（真係有睇）都保持得好好

又 post 下爛相先



Lomography Belair w/ Instant Wide Back
90mm f16 double exposure



唔知自己影緊乜，效果不似預期

收到風寶麗來告我賤

告乜？

告富賤正方形相侵犯POARLOID版權

富士出 SP-3 print instax square
可恥！

即變手機台

以後無人認真研究點影即影即有

咁我覺得家家有求
好似另post搵機嘅巴打

如果要唔fail 儲存媒介冇所謂
最緊要有相的話
梗係用相紙印好啦

canon相紙都十幾年啦我諗
唔差過（好好多其實）寶麗來或富士

果時canon展覽我都有去試
宜家睇返（真係有睇）都保持得好好

我覺得濛濛地....可能因為用40D古董機影

Back in September 2016, at photokina, Fujifilm showed to the world the Instant Square Film. Then, in 2017, Fujifilm started releasing cameras for that type of square film, the hybrid Fujifilm Instax SQ10 and the Instax Share SP-3 printer.

And as you all know, Fujifilm is making tons of money with all those nice Instax products, with expected 7.5 million Instant camera sales in 2017.

Well, now it seems that Polaroid wants a part of that money.

The reason Polaroid asks for royalties is the new Fujifilm Instant Square film. Polaroid apparently claims that Fujifilm’s square form is “essentially identical” to the one of Polaroid.

As reported at worldipreview:

“In the suit, the brand licensor and marketer of the IP rights for Polaroid instant cameras—PLR IP—was accused of “turning against Fujifilm by suddenly demanding millions of dollars in annual royalty payments, on threat of a lawsuit”.

“Fujifilm said that Polaroid had alleged trademark and trade dress infringement relating to a border on a photograph (when a photograph is printed onto a plain background to create a “square within a square” effect).”

Polaroid first asked Fujifilm not to launch any square product on the market, and now wants Fujifilm to pay licensing fees for the square format.

Both companies are not yet at court, but it’s not a good sign that a scheduled meeting for a private negotiation has been canceled.

收到風寶麗來告我賤

告乜？

告富賤正方形相侵犯POARLOID版權

如果我係富賤
即刻出隻一樣大細嘅

白撚痴四方形耶穌發明俾佢？
浪費錢去搞無謂野又可以加價

Back in September 2016, at photokina, Fujifilm showed to the world the Instant Square Film. Then, in 2017, Fujifilm started releasing cameras for that type of square film, the hybrid Fujifilm Instax SQ10 and the Instax Share SP-3 printer.

And as you all know, Fujifilm is making tons of money with all those nice Instax products, with expected 7.5 million Instant camera sales in 2017.

Well, now it seems that Polaroid wants a part of that money.

The reason Polaroid asks for royalties is the new Fujifilm Instant Square film. Polaroid apparently claims that Fujifilm’s square form is “essentially identical” to the one of Polaroid.

As reported at worldipreview:

“In the suit, the brand licensor and marketer of the IP rights for Polaroid instant cameras—PLR IP—was accused of “turning against Fujifilm by suddenly demanding millions of dollars in annual royalty payments, on threat of a lawsuit”.

“Fujifilm said that Polaroid had alleged trademark and trade dress infringement relating to a border on a photograph (when a photograph is printed onto a plain background to create a “square within a square” effect).”

Polaroid first asked Fujifilm not to launch any square product on the market, and now wants Fujifilm to pay licensing fees for the square format.

Both companies are not yet at court, but it’s not a good sign that a scheduled meeting for a private negotiation has been canceled.

宜家個ceo只為錢
佢亦只會推動為佢帶來財富嘅攝影文化

仲有冇人唔信？

Back in September 2016, at photokina, Fujifilm showed to the world the Instant Square Film. Then, in 2017, Fujifilm started releasing cameras for that type of square film, the hybrid Fujifilm Instax SQ10 and the Instax Share SP-3 printer.

And as you all know, Fujifilm is making tons of money with all those nice Instax products, with expected 7.5 million Instant camera sales in 2017.

Well, now it seems that Polaroid wants a part of that money.

The reason Polaroid asks for royalties is the new Fujifilm Instant Square film. Polaroid apparently claims that Fujifilm’s square form is “essentially identical” to the one of Polaroid.

As reported at worldipreview:

“In the suit, the brand licensor and marketer of the IP rights for Polaroid instant cameras—PLR IP—was accused of “turning against Fujifilm by suddenly demanding millions of dollars in annual royalty payments, on threat of a lawsuit”.

“Fujifilm said that Polaroid had alleged trademark and trade dress infringement relating to a border on a photograph (when a photograph is printed onto a plain background to create a “square within a square” effect).”

Polaroid first asked Fujifilm not to launch any square product on the market, and now wants Fujifilm to pay licensing fees for the square format.

Both companies are not yet at court, but it’s not a good sign that a scheduled meeting for a private negotiation has been canceled.

宜家個ceo只為錢
佢亦只會推動為佢帶來財富嘅攝影文化

仲有冇人唔信？

屌！ 唔好玩到老母四方無相紙用啊！