的士畀個波省中,的士司機揾人賠償慘被當透明人!

420 回覆
291 Like 9 Dislike
2024-06-11 15:23:45
In words of Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson, "You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour." Whether the defendant had a duty to the claimant to take precautions to take into account the foreseeability of the risk and the cost of measures to prevent the risk. The risk in this case may have been foreseeable, but it was so highly improbable that a reasonable person could not have anticipated the harm to the claimant and would not have taken any action to avoid it. In the words of Lord Normand, "It is not the law that precautions must be taken against every peril that can be foreseen by the timorous."
2024-06-11 15:24:45
而加唔係討論緊邊個嘅責任咩?
無啦啦做咩變咗點搵番踢波條友?
2024-06-11 15:24:48
刑事毀壞係蓄意你撞車對家傾唔掂數都唔會告刑事毀壞成單野最多用民事去打 而重點係有人被告 成班冇人認頭你都告唔到 就算俾你篤到幾個人出黎但冇一個好有力嘅證據去證明係邊個踢嗰一腳而整到你架車都係告唔入

2024-06-11 15:25:39
點解係踢波果個要負責任?
唔係個場設計得唔好
啲網唔夠二十層樓高搞到個波飛出執?
你點去定邊個負責任?
2024-06-11 15:25:46
睇番原來如果告 好大機會係告場地負責人(民事)
姐係政府
2024-06-11 15:25:59
點解係踢波果個要負責任?
唔係個場設計得唔好
啲網唔夠二十層樓高搞到個波飛出執?
你點去定邊個負責任?
2024-06-11 15:26:01
In words of Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson, "You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour." Whether the defendant had a duty to the claimant to take precautions to take into account the foreseeability of the risk and the cost of measures to prevent the risk. The risk in this case may have been foreseeable, but it was so highly improbable that a reasonable person could not have anticipated the harm to the claimant and would not have taken any action to avoid it. In the words of Lord Normand, "It is not the law that precautions must be taken against every peril that can be foreseen by the timorous."
2024-06-11 15:26:12
上面有告唔入案例喎
2024-06-11 15:26:35
你潛啦都係
2024-06-11 15:27:11
我問緊你啱先做咩轉移話題 你覆我呢個做咩?
2024-06-11 15:27:48
樓上啲弱智叫踢果個出嚟跌錢根本on撚鳩鳩
啲的士佬整花人架車都篤油走啦
要追數?自己去小額搞返兩三件啦
2024-06-11 15:28:25
你係咪真係有報過警架呢啲case係抄低id no.先 真係charge先寄信通知你架 咩拉左先
2024-06-11 15:28:28
DC9 認證
2024-06-11 15:28:39
人地話會告刑事毁壞架2024年仲信啲差佬講野都唔知咩構造
2024-06-11 15:28:40
on9dc9
又想呃人幾千蚊
2024-06-11 15:28:58
可能係一擊必殺王求
2024-06-11 15:29:06
誇張啲
咁你踢波飛出去省死人
唔係踢個負責邊個負責
2024-06-11 15:29:09
巴打真係好幽默
唔同你爭論咩叫夠料上court

雖則而家拉人係講興趣
你咁鍾意講法例
咁你睇咗拉人憑咩法例未?
我當你搵到邊個射個波
如果差佬唔係當場判斷佢「可能」犯而要告上法庭
拉乜鳩人?
班差佬好得閒?上唔到court拉黎托?好好玩?
2024-06-11 15:29:13
的士狗以為自己係大佬B
2024-06-11 15:29:24
條友叫踢果個出嚟賠錢,
點解變我轉移話題?

你覆我我唔覆得返你?
咁撚趣致嘅你
2024-06-11 15:29:40
如無合法辯解???笑左
2024-06-11 15:29:58
我操你媽的 誰踢我
2024-06-11 15:31:07
我又幾時話唔覆得番我? 我問你咋喎
2024-06-11 15:31:28
差佬點會搞刑毀貪冇野做咩
2024-06-11 15:31:35
場地設計問題點解變踢果個負責
比得人踢波就預咗圍網高度唔夠一定有機會踢出場
點解無啦啦變個人要負全責?
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞