室溫常壓超導體發現！？

你唔好吹大啲

其實佢哋本身都唔係咩出名嘅科學家，得一樣發明啲人只會覺得你係好彩
同牛頓完全無得比

由公布到依家都未夠4日
LK99合成1次最少要92小時
所以唔好再話咁耐都未出實驗結果就係假住先
俾啲耐性

Yield 低唔係問題 最緊要証明到可行先
之後再research 解決yield 問題

我意思係，舉個例，跟 paper 描述嘅方法個 yield 係每 20 次先成功一次，到而家為止只有三五個第三方試做，咁全部都唔成功嘅機率都唔細。換句話講，而家第三方冇人成功 replicate ，都未能證明份 paper 流嘅，要多啲人都失敗先下到結論

相呢

公佈到而家夠鐘數自己都出嚟啦咩？

*夠鐘數自己都整到出嚟啦咩

作為人類 希望係真

20次先成功1次唔係yield低
係個方法有問題

做到0.00001% yield已經係世界奇蹟

原來今日presentation個條友係lee黎

Kwon introduces, but Lee presents. Audience is frustrated by presentation in Korean which is then translated.

They claim a weak Meissner effect. It maybe it only works in a thin film.

He says they need to run a current through the material in order to levitate it. He doesn’t have a sample of the material on hand. The data looks like spotty and unsophisticated.

This obviously completely accurate information was heard in the original Korean, human translated into English, heard by native Korean speakers, writing on the forum posts of FMKorea, a website dedicated to fans of the game Football Manager in Korean, then Google Translated into English.

This is definitely financial advice and you should definitely buy a lead mine at this point.

大佬,first author都解唔通現場大佬提出既問題,點搞?

你見到幅圖點解有兩條wire吊住原來係要pass current到個粒野到先有所謂既"meissner effect"

我明你講乜 但我諗你唔係好清楚我意思係乜
只要証明到常温常壓超導體係可能存在
就算個方法係幾差幾難replicate都好
都已經係一個超大突破
呢個係等同於發明transistor嘅發現
個magnitude 係大過你想像好多

唔係掛

要pass current落去粒野先叫做浮起就已經唔係咩superconductor,只係將粒野變左做magnet,然後replusion,完

At least叫做整到先
本來應該有多啲時間研究，係無啦啦畀條友pub咗出嚟

lm學嘢

呢點我十分同意
#183
正如有 1947 年嗰舊元祖 transistor
先至有今日納米制程嘅 transistor

Lm

佢prove到係得就有半個地球嘅人衝黎幫佢搞量產搞 yield

普通人急黎做乜鳩就算好簡單既驗證方法你都冇可能係屋企做出黎 咁你想點討論？ 討論真假？ 諾貝爾獎把人會去架啦 要普羅大眾去check架？

一單係學術水平極高 一單係普世價值判斷到既話題 邊一邊多人搭到嗲唔撚使講啦下話 定你想托下自己同其他人與眾不同？

LMYSA

成班科技撚喺度陪班呃人嘅韓狗科學家打飛機

唔使諗都知係造假