室溫常壓超導體發現！？

It is now time to do the unpleasant: deconstruct the non-experimental parts of the Korean room temp SC claims. This is relevant because the theoretical/background SC discussions in these papers are so naïve that if it were an undergraduate project at Maryland we would give an F

Ref. 24 is mentioned as a key theoretical reference. This work, which provides a radical hole-based SC theory contrasting with the universally accepted SC theories, is not accepted by the community at all

....as mentioned in the BR-BCS theory" This is total nuts-- the BR is Ref. 17, a well-known work... the celebrated Brinkman-Rice theory has NOTHING whatsoever to do with SC, except in the fantasy of the third coauthor HT Kim who wrote a paper in 2017 on "high-Tc mechanism through analysis of diverging effective mass.." which was never published (because it is manifestly insane as far as we can tell) and which received only 2 outside citations!

... 2307.12008 cites as Ref. 52 a recent version of BR-BCS theory published in a journal which does not reject papers Sci Rep 11 , 10329 (2021) The underlying claim is so absurd that we cannot even laugh. ...This mistake falls in the 'not even wring' category, and we will not critique it further

Nothing in what we say in this tweet thread invalidates the experimental claims in these papers, which can only be verified (or not) through actual experiments in independent laboratories. We hope that such verification process is already underway in many labs