［網球］ATP和WTA討論區(31)

政府果邊都未開始講

佢成件事已經swing左去佢係入境果陣 suffer既事又唔係打唔打針既問題

反而想知如果政府輸咗係咪政府都可以上訴，咁祖就冇得出去住直至再審
到時比賽都開始咗就已經冇意思

但願如此
如果唔係政府好無面

入到境打到AO就真係反苗GOAT

其實點都唔會俾佢打
就算佢贏court case
好似最終都可以deport佢
因為放佢入嚟做anti-vax代言人
Vic govt會勁頭痕

咁咪惡個共產黨
如果澳洲federal真係咁輸打嬴要遣返祖
到昤可能NK都撐祖

Australia’s cruel new threat to Djokovic

Djokovic is arguing he has a valid reason for a medical exemption not to be vaccinated against Covid-19 because he has contracted the virus within the last six months.

His lawyers submitted a 35-page document Saturday arguing his visa was wrongly cancelled and should be reinstated, allowing him to compete.

The team argued that Djokovic’s claim of a positive PCR test on December 16 means he meets the criteria for a vaccine exemption under the guidance of Australia’s immunisation advisory body.

But Australia’s Home Affairs Department has rebuffed his arguments point-by-point and urged the judge to dismiss the case, with costs.

Djokovic is unvaccinated and poses a risk to people and the health system in Australia, the government said in a 13-page document lodged with the court on Sunday.

The government added “there is no such thing as an assurance of entry by a non-citizen into Australia”.

“As for material given to the applicant by the Department, it had not represented to the applicant that his so-called ‘medical exemption’ would be accepted,” the submission said.

Significantly, the government’s submission also said it retains the right to keep Djokovic detained even if he wins Monday’s case.

“If the Court makes an additional orders for immediate release of the applicant, notwithstanding the above, the respondent submits that the Court should make it expressly clear that that order does not purport to (nor could it) prevent the respondent or any officer of the Commonwealth from exercising any power to detain that might be available to him or her despite the quashing of the delegate’s cancellation decision,” the submission said.

“An order for immediate release does not prevent re-detention if there is power to detain.”

判咗都驅逐就真係太肉酸

好撚慘唔人道呀

redetain je...真係appeal再detain佢搞到佢無得抽籤就真係common law國家黎講太賤
頭先當地時間1345已經離開得酒店
不過佢搵個間律師樓係要打左針先入得
而家court應該就開 (1515 local time)...而家遲左十分鐘

Govt 輸都可以appeal，同埋都應該一定會 appeal，佢 appeal完之前都應該唔會有 visa 俾佢周圍走

搞得嚟都開始咗AO
賽會仲要事前知老祖打唔打到先編到賽程

成件事根本係政治操作多過防疫考慮，借民粹去獲取政治本錢

個judge其實好幫祖
上星期關心佢有無得練波
今日問佢有無得order gluten free food
唔知會唔會偏幫到唔比fed gov申請禁制令
不過就算appeal究竟真係關心public risk 定係日後fed gov vs state gov vs TA到時邊個賠錢機會大D

依家個court case好似係話unfairly cancel his visa
就算djo贏咗
Govt再用無犯錯嘅方法cancel多次佢visa都得
因為PR角度 依家放祖去打AO
真係仆直

我反而覺得似係用法庭放生多D
澳洲政府今鋪由頭到尾都碌柒架啦
比唔比祖打都係政治操作
唔比可能保到民望幫到下屆選舉...但同極權政府無分別
比既話民眾一定屌到飛天...為AO利益比祖特權

PR角度點都仆直左
Day one發現左唔得就驅逐咩都唔洗煩

hur爆佢啦！

所以我先話點 appeal祖都無可能打到

比佢出到黎，就會係imply澳洲呢一年不停吹針= 無用

所以我先唔明點解祖咁堅持，其實祖啲pr無理由睇唔到係100%無可能比佢打，點解仲要樹敵

遲啲interview 問佢點解17號周圍走，佢點答？

祖呢次入唔到即係以後都入唔到
唔會覺得佢會冇啦啦打番針
就算打可能已經退休

又唔洗拉埋極權嚟講住 法治社會都可以上訴嘅
其實袋鼠國本身就係嚴封開 全球最嚴之一
好多國民之前都唔比返國
in a way 唔比祖打先make sense 至少對好多澳人嚟講係

佢射去比 tennis Australia 咋嘛
點會極權
政府大可以話佢11月一早同左ta講話中covid係無 exemption

又唔可以話以後既，遲啲既事邊個知

下年澳洲covid policy 又可能會唔同 但今年佢就唔洗諗啦

我諗呢個政策5-10年都唔會轉

由祖出道以來，無論佢自己，佢老豆，佢條team，佢啲fans，甚至佢成個老鄉都係不斷樹敵，你仲問佢點解要樹敵

真係Interview問佢的話，佢求其講啲嘢遊下花園你吹得佢漲咩？
根本人無恥便無敵