又少左幾個連登仔
又關連登咩事
之後好多post支持亂倫同孌童
同埋屌9 gay佬
話情願支持d孌童犯
話佢地只係蘿莉控
睇黎好多連登仔睇完呢單新聞會驚到日日訓唔到
13人涉管有兒童色情物品 警撿2萬張相片+7千套影片
蓮佛美沙子
490 回覆
26 Like
7 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁
之後好多post支持亂倫同孌童
同埋屌9 gay佬
話情願支持d孌童犯
話佢地只係蘿莉控
睇黎好多連登仔睇完呢單新聞會驚到日日訓唔到
又少左幾個連登仔
又關連登咩事
之後好多post支持亂倫同孌童
同埋屌9 gay佬
話情願支持d孌童犯
話佢地只係蘿莉控
睇黎好多連登仔睇完呢單新聞會驚到日日訓唔到
網絡世紀既窮人，多多少少都唔乾淨。
單單係果D乜自拍，條女個樣嫩D，個官個未夠秤。
你又搵唔到人証明。咁就比人砌死左。
又少左幾個連登仔
又關連登咩事
之後好多post支持亂倫同孌童
同埋屌9 gay佬
話情願支持d孌童犯
話佢地只係蘿莉控
睇黎好多連登仔睇完呢單新聞會驚到日日訓唔到
但比人人格謀殺左先。
理論上tor vpn tail encrypt 埋file hard disk 應該check 唔到，除非你瘋狂下載加瘋狂share 啦
好恐怖 
H動研討會既爸打要小心
其實點check
養定隻WannaCry，有人拍門就開著佢
拿依個老架
上網睇咪算囉，dl落嚟做乜柒
睇到時電腦已經dl 左...
你叫樹根？
外國有案例,唔係下載電影只係streaming都犯法,即係temporary files都計數
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/kodi-update-streaming-pirated-video-10305875
遲d香港會唔會click過pornhub都要拉？
上網睇咪算囉，dl落嚟做乜柒
睇到時電腦已經dl 左...
你叫樹根？
外國有案例,唔係下載電影只係streaming都犯法,即係temporary files都計數
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/kodi-update-streaming-pirated-video-10305875
噉係因為streaming而非 temp / cache
上網睇咪算囉，dl落嚟做乜柒
睇到時電腦已經dl 左...
你叫樹根？
外國有案例,唔係下載電影只係streaming都犯法,即係temporary files都計數
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/kodi-update-streaming-pirated-video-10305875
噉係因為streaming而非 temp / cache
streaming係有temporary files
上網睇咪算囉，dl落嚟做乜柒
睇到時電腦已經dl 左...
你叫樹根？
外國有案例,唔係下載電影只係streaming都犯法,即係temporary files都計數
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/kodi-update-streaming-pirated-video-10305875
噉係因為streaming而非 temp / cache
streaming係有temporary files
The ruling is significant because it means the fact that streaming only generates temporary files is no longer a legitimate defence against charges of copyright infringement.
睇得細路都係變態
睇得細路都係變態
所以要屈人一定屈佢睇cp 一定無人幫佢
16以下都係CP。
其實諗諗下，要屈人真係唔難
睇得細路都係變態
所以要屈人一定屈佢睇cp 一定無人幫佢
16以下都係CP。
其實諗諗下，要屈人真係唔難
連登仔會幫
點會無人幫
呢到係反gay撐亂倫同撐睇cp既人
上網睇咪算囉，dl落嚟做乜柒
睇到時電腦已經dl 左...
你叫樹根？
外國有案例,唔係下載電影只係streaming都犯法,即係temporary files都計數
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/kodi-update-streaming-pirated-video-10305875
噉係因為streaming而非 temp / cache
streaming係有temporary files
The ruling is significant because it means the fact that streaming only generates temporary files is no longer a legitimate defence against charges of copyright infringement.
個case係streaming唔係你單單留咗 temp / cache, 冇衝突
我解錯咗上面某意思
上網睇咪算囉，dl落嚟做乜柒
睇到時電腦已經dl 左...
你叫樹根？
外國有案例,唔係下載電影只係streaming都犯法,即係temporary files都計數
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/kodi-update-streaming-pirated-video-10305875
噉係因為streaming而非 temp / cache
streaming係有temporary files
The ruling is significant because it means the fact that streaming only generates temporary files is no longer a legitimate defence against charges of copyright infringement.
個case係streaming唔係你單單留咗 temp / cache, 冇衝突
我解錯咗上面某意思
個point係 temporary files 已經違反左 "right of reproduction"
...the Court of Justice of the European Union stated that the temporary reproduction of a copyright-protected work, obtained without the consent of the copyright holder, is NOT exempt from the "right of reproduction".
如果應用係CP上, 你上網睇完CP產生左temp / cache, 法官可以認為你管有CP
http://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=102237&QS=%28%7B%E5%85%92%E7%AB%A5%E8%89%B2%E6%83%85%7D+%25charge%29&TP=RS
4. Upon search, a number of external hard disks were seized. In one of the disks was found a cartoon depicting naked girls under 16 years old. The defendant was arrested for the offence of Possession of Child Pornography. The defendant said under caution that the computer on the premises was for his own use and the child pornography photos belonged to him.
5. From the seized hard disks, the computer forensic examiner recovered 262 photos and 2 videos of child pornography previously deleted. According to the forensic pathologist who viewed the images, they depict individuals under 16 years old, with one estimated to be 3 to 4 years old.
4. Upon search, a number of external hard disks were seized. In one of the disks was found a cartoon depicting naked girls under 16 years old. The defendant was arrested for the offence of Possession of Child Pornography. The defendant said under caution that the computer on the premises was for his own use and the child pornography photos belonged to him.
5. From the seized hard disks, the computer forensic examiner recovered 262 photos and 2 videos of child pornography previously deleted. According to the forensic pathologist who viewed the images, they depict individuals under 16 years old, with one estimated to be 3 to 4 years old.