沙田攻略＋警犬戰術分析＋戰術檢討

神驅 · 2019-07-14T01:53:32+08:00

呢個po集咗幾人之力我哋才疏學淺但希望可以引起討論唔想再見到手足比狗當沙包打逼到要跳橋 Part 1: 粗略分析黑警戰術沸水戰術(kettling) 可以見到啲警方喺屯門同埋今日都係特登包疪啲會引起公憤嘅人 (i.e. 屯門娜娜；上水影相肥鳩）然後乘機誘示威者衝/引發對峙最後出嚟嘅時候就可以出師有名呢個唔駛多講大家都知狗嘅目標應該係為咗拉多啲人高調拉然後低調放最終目的係引起群眾恐慌消耗民意而且都係老生常談啦佢哋係用緊「沸水戰術（kettling)」故名思意就係啲狗好似滾水咁四方八面而來目的係以少人數但係well-equipped咁將你前後包抄將你嘅空間不停收窄將人群壓縮達成群眾恐慌驚起上嚟就可以拉你唯所欲為加上林鄭老母又打咗枝強心針講明唔會調查所以啲狗對住我哋啲「刁民」完全無同理心肆意濫暴 By encircling his enemies within as tight a space as possible, Hannibal was able to create a front line where he actually outnumbered his opponents, despite the their greater numbers, whilst simultaneously creating panic within their trapped ranks. Kettling嘅目標從來都唔係為咗驅散人群旺角嗰次都有狗講「唔畀你哋走啊，俾你哋玩咗成晚啦」而且佢哋係出椒等等都捉到幾次佢哋係毫無預警下就來料今日亦係一係就追鳩住你嚟打一係就後前後進攻目的明顯唔係想驅散你次次都留到散水咁滯先嚟夾攻你除咗發泄完全為咗消耗手足嘅戰意嚇窒我哋直至我哋唔敢再出嚟所以無論如何都要戰佢老母 kettling is not ultimately about stopping violence or disorder. It is about discouraging protest, about punishing people for having the audacity to stand up against the state 以上都係參考咗一篇文** 亦有提及點樣突破呢個戰術基本上有兩點： 1）唔好比佢有機會收窄我哋霸條路越闊就越好 2）發現佢開始成陣型就要喺佢後面反包佢人數其實就係我哋最好嘅優勢多人自然就會霸到路呢個唔駛我講大家都知人數決定一切往往大包抄都係臨收尾好次今日上水咁明明係去到尾根本係隊尾啲人未行完佢就嚟料而行完啲人就開始散band 趁人數開始少空間亦開始少就開你波（今日天橋咁）somehow中信事件都係一樣所以我哋行上水屯門或者沙田呢啲地方根本係無嘢要守一見少人就應該要行去佢防線後面由佢圍我哋變到係我哋圍返佢咁就可以突破佢啱啱開始成陣型嘅時候係最弱所以有手足見到有啲問題就唔該鳩叫又好點都好傳播比所有人知要alert佢哋要有手足喺佢哋後面可以嘅話唔好打不還手實行喺後面搞鳩佢哋唔駛下下埋身肉博大佬佢full gear 你得把爛鬼遮仲要之後比人屈係鐡枝我哋要嘅係機動性可以嘅話同佢哋保持距離總之唔好比佢圍住內文亦有提過可以集體坐低以擴大個空間但係我認為呢個要大家都有共識先可以做到同埋我哋基於我哋無嘢要守呢點可以留返往後金鐘或者要留守時先用小妹實彈唔多希望有識之士可以認真討論下點突破佢呢個戰術 ** cr to http://anarchish.blogspot.com/2011/01/how-to-win-at-kettling-guide-for-non.html 番外：建議捨棄戰術建議捨棄戰術： 1. 捨棄101拘捕令 101拘捕令初衷係拘捕對家疑犯而成功落案起訴先至為之有效然而Charge唔係我地落最終都係要過黑警個關咁究竟101拘捕令係咪真係行得通？睇一睇今日上水廣場天橋事件事實證明101拘捕令根本離地無考慮到執法機關簡稱狗既執法態度今時今日示威者面對黑警仲以為有法可依真理必勝忘記而家狗隻係選擇性執法、視法紀如無物 101拘捕後又點? 事實係依然會照放犯！ [red] 而且101拘捕令另一個bug 係容易係低防範之下同黑警引起正面衝突例如今日上水（睇番上水廣場天橋始末post) 圍住黑警想強逼警察受理落案但黑警可以係人群大叫一聲襲警就扮被示威者衝擊即時引爆警暴間接接開路比機會黑警進入人群施暴總括而言落唔到charge 101拘捕令等於無效所以無謂再執著拉犯而損失手足 [red] 傷敵一百而自損一千請捨棄101捨捕令唔夠字下一層再續