This argument is flawed in several ways. Firstly, the conclusion that doctors are only in it for the money is a hasty generalization based on the premise that lowering their pay would lead to most of them quitting. This may not be the only reason why doctors would quit, as there could be other factors such as working conditions, lack of resources, and dissatisfaction with their job that would contribute to their decision to leave.
Furthermore, it is possible that some doctors would choose to remain in their profession despite a pay cut, as they may have a genuine passion for helping others and a desire to make a positive impact in the world. This would contradict the argument that doctors are only in it for the money.
Additionally, the argument assumes that lowering the pay of doctors would be the only way to address the issue of high healthcare costs. There may be other ways to achieve this goal, such as reducing administrative costs or improving efficiency in the healthcare system, that do not involve reducing the pay of doctors.
In conclusion, the argument that lowering the pay of doctors would lead to most of them quitting, and therefore they are only in it for the money, is a flawed argument that does not consider the complexity and multiple factors that contribute to the issue.