屌那星曼城第一球咁都唔係越位？

我諗個爭拗點係球證覺得係佢自己控甩咗然後先畀人搶走咗個波，而維拉球員覺得係因為人地壓迫所以先控柒咗

球證角度可能係睇你拎波個刻有冇受壓迫，拎個刻冇既話，你一拎甩對手就可以馬上搶你波

其實在ming用心口控波一刻，施華已經冇越位

施華緊係冇越啦 洛迪有呀ma

屌那星曼城第一球咁都唔係越位？
https://lih.kg/gArjvT
#9 回覆 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區

講左啦屌你老母

嘈乜鳩

三分已袋
理撚得你

sor 唔記得左
咁你係覺得有越定冇越好亂

係ming自己on9控球失誤被人搶，洛迪又無影響ming
其實ming選擇唔觸及個球一定越位，係自己出錯

上盤咪話onside
下盤咪話offside
手持上盤 入球有效

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMEPHvLZ2O0

我覺得無，但如果你嬲我會開心d

#197

球例都是錯的
只有樓主既想法先係正確

都係架
都話睇開中超啦屌

https://www.instagram.com/p/CKgy1jHoC3g/?igshid=1aurxj4306bqp

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4298611/man-citys-goal-vs-aston-villa-was-offsidepremier-league-admits

呢球事實就係100%越位
依家英足總出黎認錯啦

ching 點睇你柒左

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4298611/man-citys-goal-vs-aston-villa-was-offsidepremier-league-admits

ching 點睇你柒左撐左咁耐

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4298611/man-citys-goal-vs-aston-villa-was-offsidepremier-league-admits

Ming仔終於平反

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4298611/man-citys-goal-vs-aston-villa-was-offsidepremier-league-admits

ching 點睇你柒左

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4298611/man-citys-goal-vs-aston-villa-was-offsidepremier-league-admits

ching 點睇你柒左

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4298611/man-citys-goal-vs-aston-villa-was-offsidepremier-league-admits

洗撚拍片 英足總出黎平反喇柒頭

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/english-premier-league/story/4298611/man-citys-goal-vs-aston-villa-was-offsidepremier-league-admits

我岩咪堅持己見囉

上面話唔係越位班柒頭上水未

樓主