屌那星曼城第一球咁都唔係越位？
嬲屌專家
352 回覆
21 Like
57 Dislike
理論上可以既派2-3個人捕，不過你會輸反擊輸到傻
可能近年d中堅中意上腳，搞到多左好多爭議，以前中堅一定大腳解圍
可能近年d中堅中意上腳，搞到多左好多爭議，以前中堅一定大腳解圍
唔好搞笑啦 以前你企係度都已經要吹越位啦 仲有得話冇參與進攻咩
如果真係要咁樣搞真係害死英超 又變返90年代高Q大腳咁樣好睇咩唔通 成分鐘個波都唔落地
如果真係要咁樣搞真係害死英超 又變返90年代高Q大腳咁樣好睇咩唔通 成分鐘個波都唔落地
Ching分析
Ming仔波都未撚控落黎就俾人搶走左
D契弟仲話冇越
Ming仔波都未撚控落黎就俾人搶走左
D契弟仲話冇越
呢球波以前一路都係條友知自己越左
會慢慢行返黎 唔會做任何野
Rodri條契弟就陰陰濕濕咁
邊有得咁架大佬
唔係話反邊隊
就算對家係我愛隊 我都會覺得呢球係越位
會慢慢行返黎 唔會做任何野
Rodri條契弟就陰陰濕濕咁
邊有得咁架大佬
唔係話反邊隊
就算對家係我愛隊 我都會覺得呢球係越位
講波都變五毛
- interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate
曼城球員完全冇掂到個波咁點符合呢點呢
- gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
• rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar, match official or an opponent
• been deliberately saved by any opponent
講漏左，其實第3點都有得拗
deflect 同 rebound係講緊個球員毫無準備/冇反應時間個波飛去佢到而反彈出黎既波
所以呢球另一個重點就係究竟佢係deliberately played定係saved
就算我當佢係阻截，只要個情況係冇越位球員影響到佢或者佢有好多選擇既情況，就算佢撻q，都係deliberately played，就好似上面熱刺果球咁
曼城球員完全冇掂到個波咁點符合呢點呢
- gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
• rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar, match official or an opponent
• been deliberately saved by any opponent
講漏左，其實第3點都有得拗
deflect 同 rebound係講緊個球員毫無準備/冇反應時間個波飛去佢到而反彈出黎既波
所以呢球另一個重點就係究竟佢係deliberately played定係saved
就算我當佢係阻截，只要個情況係冇越位球員影響到佢或者佢有好多選擇既情況，就算佢撻q，都係deliberately played，就好似上面熱刺果球咁
印象呢 d 波，就算後衛頂返前，都會吹越位
即係個分別係解圍同控落黎？(雖然條友控唔定要修正)
即係個分別係解圍同控落黎？(雖然條友控唔定要修正)
咁呢個肯定就唔係deflect同rebound既
但我睇FA既Rules係
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside
Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
interfering with an opponent by:
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
challenging an opponent for the ball or
clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or
making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
我是唔是有咩誤解
但我睇FA既Rules係
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside
Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
interfering with an opponent by:
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
challenging an opponent for the ball or
clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or
making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
我是唔是有咩誤解
其實你都唔聽人講
洗乜開post討論
洗乜開post討論
冇計 呢球真係越位
Ming仔一控落腳Rodri條撚樣就偷波
佢偷波個波仲要係越位位
跟本正常人都知係越位
Ming仔一控落腳Rodri條撚樣就偷波
佢偷波個波仲要係越位位
跟本正常人都知係越位
冇誤解呀，但曼城球員點樣影響到個後衛既玩波能力？
但球例上佢完全冇犯規
就係咁解
就係咁解
兩三個等你埋黎逼搶
大腳省前你點搶 當打少兩個
大腳省前你點搶 當打少兩個
https://www.google.com.hk/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/manchester-city/bernardo-silva-goal-rodri-offside-rule-b1790347.html%3famp
Bernardo Silva’s Man City goal against Aston Villa right to stand as PGMOL explains why Rodri was not offside
In a statement, the PGMOL clarified that the officials were right to let the goal stand because Mings “deliberately played the ball”.
The statement read: "In the 79th minute of Manchester City vs. Aston Villa, Bernardo Silva scored for Manchester City. In the build-up to the goal, Rodri was initially standing in an offside position as the ball was played upfield. Tyrone Mings deliberately played the ball, controlling it on his chest. As soon as Mings deliberately played the ball the following Law applies: A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent
"As the Law deems that Rodri has not gained an advantage, he has not committed an offside offence and play should be allowed to continue. Rodri legitimately took possession of the ball from Mings, starting the attack which resulted in the goal."
Bernardo Silva’s Man City goal against Aston Villa right to stand as PGMOL explains why Rodri was not offside
In a statement, the PGMOL clarified that the officials were right to let the goal stand because Mings “deliberately played the ball”.
The statement read: "In the 79th minute of Manchester City vs. Aston Villa, Bernardo Silva scored for Manchester City. In the build-up to the goal, Rodri was initially standing in an offside position as the ball was played upfield. Tyrone Mings deliberately played the ball, controlling it on his chest. As soon as Mings deliberately played the ball the following Law applies: A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent
"As the Law deems that Rodri has not gained an advantage, he has not committed an offside offence and play should be allowed to continue. Rodri legitimately took possession of the ball from Mings, starting the attack which resulted in the goal."
challenging an opponent for the ball喎 咪即係press同tackle囉
個波米9幾高跌落黎喎 點大腳 到你掂到個波果下已經3條友包實你啦 佢一直就企係你身邊等你掂個波先 仲省鬼到去前咩
英超越唔越位我話事
越唔越位我話事牙朗快咗出腳
你省過黎我就要即刻接架?
係你其他球員跑到上黎之前 等個波落地慢慢碌都仲得啦 隨時直接出底線變龍門球
係你其他球員跑到上黎之前 等個波落地慢慢碌都仲得啦
隨時直接出底線變龍門球隔成兩個身位點樣press/tackle
隔成兩個身位仲要係後衛後面點樣影響個後衛玩波？
隔成兩個身位仲要係後衛後面點樣影響個後衛玩波？
第一下搵心口控已經係叫玩緊波
嗰下Rodri係冇阻到Mings
嗰下Rodri係冇阻到Mings
呢球點樣類似呀