連仔幾時做嘢？ 而家連Twitter都ban中國打手啦
Genzo
1070 回覆
596 Like
5 Dislike
Genzo
2019-08-25 16:29:54
連仔幾時先好似twitter同YouTube咁，ban啲中國網軍
Genzo
2019-08-25 16:36:27
I have not claim 'full of'. You are using straw man fallacy here.
unfeasible? any evidence to support what you claim in #581?
I ask the question before your question. So you should answer my question before you ask me anything.
Genzo
2019-08-25 16:37:29
連仔幾時先好似twitter同YouTube咁，ban啲中國網軍
onecares
2019-08-25 16:39:47
應該。
Genzo
2019-08-25 17:48:58
連仔幾時先好似twitter同YouTube咁，ban啲中國網軍
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:23:30
spotting grammatical mistakes (if any), but not talking about the topic , is a kind of distration.
I have not claimed 'full of'. You are using straw man fallacy here.
unfeasible? any evidence to support what you claim in #581?
I ask the question before your question. So you should answer my question before you ask me anything.
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:29:28
There are some users using a lot of logical fallancies to defend China, or the interest of China. So it is reasonable to say there are 中國網軍in lihkg .
Anyone who is saying something that is benefical to China, then he or she should be banned. Just like you. you are distracting the post which suggest to ban 中國網軍.
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:31:55
我只知道你不斷喺一個叫連仔ban 中國打手嘅post 入面轉移視線同用邏輯謬誤去詭辯. 你咁做係對中國呢個獨裁政權有利. 你呢啲幫助中國獨裁政權嘅人, ban 你的話只係保護言論自由
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:32:19
連仔幾時先好似twitter同YouTube咁，ban啲中國網軍
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:34:05
spotting grammatical mistakes (if any), but not talking about the topic , is a kind of distration.
I have not claimed 'full of'. You are using straw man fallacy here.
unfeasible? any evidence to support what you claim in #581?
I ask the question before your question. So you should answer my question before you ask me anything
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:34:50
連仔幾時先好似twitter同YouTube咁，ban啲中國網軍
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:37:50
There are some users using a lot of logical fallancies to defend China, or the interest of China. So it is reasonable to say there are 中國網軍in lihkg .
Anyone who is saying something that is benefical to China, then he or she should be banned. Just like you. you are distracting the post which suggest to ban 中國網軍.
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:40:32
例如#93043, #296937同#306681
Genzo
2019-08-25 23:40:45
spotting grammatical mistakes (if any), but not talking about the topic , is a kind of distration.
I have not claimed 'full of'. You are using straw man fallacy here.
unfeasible? any evidence to support what you claim in #581?
I ask the question before your question. So you should answer my question before you ask me anything