可能係將啲真data但改到無名無姓嘅
抄落黎
你話係老作嘅咪得 跟本都追查唔到
明報：名醫潘冬平回應女兒獲創科獎惹「請槍」爭議 「相信比賽單位核實後會有公正結論」
726756
352 回覆
19 Like
196 Dislike
權貴之間好多黨派
如果有好機會拉人落馬 對家唔會放過
如果佢勢力係大到咁 唔會俾醫委會判罪成
當年都唔會敗走HKU
佢係有錢 但唔係有權
如果有好機會拉人落馬 對家唔會放過
如果佢勢力係大到咁 唔會俾醫委會判罪成
當年都唔會敗走HKU
佢係有錢 但唔係有權
有一個唔同意你都死
都係喎
, 潘醫生就慘啦, 生咗個傻女出嚟搞到咁大件事
, 潘醫生就慘啦, 生咗個傻女出嚟搞到咁大件事https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E5%B7%AE%E5%88%86%E9%9A%90%E7%A7%81
麻省理工學院的拉坦亞·斯維尼將匿名化的GIC資料庫（包含每位患者的出生日期、性別和郵政編碼）與選民登記記錄相連後，可以找出麻薩諸塞州州長的病歷。
麻省理工學院的拉坦亞·斯維尼將匿名化的GIC資料庫（包含每位患者的出生日期、性別和郵政編碼）與選民登記記錄相連後，可以找出麻薩諸塞州州長的病歷。
包含每位患者的出生日期、性別和郵政編碼
?
?
仲柒撚過唔回應
屌根本由一開始到依家 條女所有料都係其他網民幫手搵
依家爆得七七八八 唔信仲可以有咩新料爆
依家爆得七七八八 唔信仲可以有咩新料爆
Block 7 佢
睇快好多
屌
一定支持啦
釘晒呢79個醫生牌
反正連登隨便執幾個去都做到同類既工作
一定支持啦
釘晒呢79個醫生牌
反正連登隨便執幾個去都做到同類既工作
Ching 真係有心覆，respect
條人形豬要出位同流量咋嘛
而家大把
而家大把
會唔會又係70幾個simulated doctors
個醫生而家都係兩害取其輕 認simulated patient data起碼係想解決私隱問題先
至於個女攞唔攞獎 去到呢個情況佢唔care啦
至於個女攞唔攞獎 去到呢個情況佢唔care啦
人地用simulated data 避開左privacy 你就以為真係無價值 ，真係on9
你同人地有仇？
放hate speech 想點
利申： 識佢老鼠
但鐘意睇人折墮
in this case - poon family
放hate speech 想點
利申： 識佢老鼠
但鐘意睇人折墮
in this case - poon family
佢老豆要畫清界線，就算點糟質個囡
個囡都係醫學世家出身
先唔講醫途前途錢途
日後就算唔嫁個好碼頭
家世都足夠佢買下包包
你估佢真係關心我地依d 酸民點諗？🤣
個囡都係醫學世家出身
先唔講醫途前途錢途
日後就算唔嫁個好碼頭
家世都足夠佢買下包包
你估佢真係關心我地依d 酸民點諗？🤣
首先 佢真係好豬同醜樣 - 係客觀事實 關hate speech咩事
睇潘出事 純粹食下花生, why not
但city妹 擺明係搏出位, 左痴右痴極煩膠
唔希望見到呢啲垃圾上位
睇潘出事 純粹食下花生, why not
但city妹 擺明係搏出位, 左痴右痴極煩膠
唔希望見到呢啲垃圾上位
所以認simulated patient data起碼件事唔會燒到自己有data privacy 問題先 個女臭爭朵佢都可以養過世有凸
這裡是香港，會有事咩
同你繼續討論先係今日最無價值既事
就快五點收工，唔會無薪同你討論
但你咁擁護AI
接下黎交比FREE COPILOT 同你談情
Thanks for sharing the article—this gives much clearer context.
The case of the St. Paul’s Co-educational College student and her AI project Medisafe 藥倍安心 is a complex and cautionary tale. On the surface, it was a celebrated innovation: an AI-powered platform to verify prescriptions and reduce medical errors. But the controversy that followed—allegations of outsourcing the development to a U.S.-based AI company, potential misuse of patient data, and questions about the student’s actual involvement—has cast a long shadow.
What’s especially troubling is the possibility that real patient data may have been used without proper consent, or that simulated data was presented without transparency. Both scenarios raise red flags about data ethics and privacy. The fact that the student is the daughter of a prominent medical figure has also fueled public skepticism about fairness and privilege.
This situation underscores a few key issues:
Academic integrity: If the project was not primarily the student’s own work, it undermines the spirit of the competition and the credibility of such awards.
Data ethics: Using sensitive medical data—real or simulated—requires strict adherence to privacy laws and ethical standards.
Systemic pressure: The drive to win accolades can push students (and their families) toward questionable decisions, especially in elite academic environments.
The student has stated she is cooperating with the investigation, and the Digital Policy Office has launched a full inquiry. That’s the right step. But beyond this individual case, it’s a wake-up call for how we mentor young innovators and enforce ethical standards in STEM education.
就快五點收工，唔會無薪同你討論
但你咁擁護AI
接下黎交比FREE COPILOT 同你談情
Thanks for sharing the article—this gives much clearer context.
The case of the St. Paul’s Co-educational College student and her AI project Medisafe 藥倍安心 is a complex and cautionary tale. On the surface, it was a celebrated innovation: an AI-powered platform to verify prescriptions and reduce medical errors. But the controversy that followed—allegations of outsourcing the development to a U.S.-based AI company, potential misuse of patient data, and questions about the student’s actual involvement—has cast a long shadow.
What’s especially troubling is the possibility that real patient data may have been used without proper consent, or that simulated data was presented without transparency. Both scenarios raise red flags about data ethics and privacy. The fact that the student is the daughter of a prominent medical figure has also fueled public skepticism about fairness and privilege.
This situation underscores a few key issues:
Academic integrity: If the project was not primarily the student’s own work, it undermines the spirit of the competition and the credibility of such awards.
Data ethics: Using sensitive medical data—real or simulated—requires strict adherence to privacy laws and ethical standards.
Systemic pressure: The drive to win accolades can push students (and their families) toward questionable decisions, especially in elite academic environments.
The student has stated she is cooperating with the investigation, and the Digital Policy Office has launched a full inquiry. That’s the right step. But beyond this individual case, it’s a wake-up call for how we mentor young innovators and enforce ethical standards in STEM education.
首先唔好太片面
Judge 人可以唔睇外觀睇番實力方面
最少佢碌得入 google summer internship
係有冇say 依方面 佢一定多過你我他
humble d
Judge 人可以唔睇外觀睇番實力方面
最少佢碌得入 google summer internship
係有冇say 依方面 佢一定多過你我他
humble d
上網睇GSoC好似係open source contributor
唔算internship
利申 唔知咩嚟
弱智用AI gen段野出黎做乜鳩？
用AI gen段野出黎做乜鳩？