原來基督教咁多嘢都唔撚做得
鳩硬冇親戚
556 回覆
1410 Like
67 Dislike
填習爺爺睇下佢地敢點搞你?
文法上既唔一致都成為左吸引讀者既方法。
文法上既唔一致都成為左吸引讀者既方法。
文法上既唔一致都成為左吸引讀者既方法。
唔怪得之要派啲磁力白卡嚟鳩噏傳教
似乎都係要吸引受眾
文法上既唔一致都成為左吸引讀者既方法。
文法上既唔一致都成為左吸引讀者既方法。
唔怪得之要派啲磁力白卡嚟鳩噏傳教
似乎都係要吸引受眾
複*雜
車仔麵都冇咁多選擇
我想問班耶撚係咪咁清高唔睇漫畫
車仔麵都冇咁多選擇
我想問班耶撚係咪咁清高唔睇漫畫
佢信嘅神啲啟示要靠文法畀人blue curtains先解得通，咁無能嘅神仲信嚟做咩？
所以一直都話，即使我當佢啱，呢個咁嘅神點解要信？仲蠢過同無能過隨便一個人
所以一直都話，即使我當佢啱，呢個咁嘅神點解要信？仲蠢過同無能過隨便一個人
聖經係猶太人寫既，猶太人既理解係咁，所以我照講。
你可以用自己既方法解釋，不過如果咁做，就唔係任何一個猶太拉比既門徒，in particular唔係聖經所講耶穌既門徒。
你可以用自己既方法解釋，不過如果咁做，就唔係任何一個猶太拉比既門徒，in particular唔係聖經所講耶穌既門徒。
唔使扮，你已經表演緊緊你自己嘅方法解釋緊，你信嘅係自己，唔係耶穌／聖經
又拎猶太人出嚟拋書包又係搞笑，猶太人仲信緊猶太人教，你真係洗自己腦洗到以為自己嘅解釋＞聖經 唔好誘惑人去信別的福音啦你
又拎猶太人出嚟拋書包又係搞笑，猶太人仲信緊猶太人教，你真係洗自己腦洗到以為自己嘅解釋＞聖經
唔好誘惑人去信別的福音啦你聖經一開始，創世記1:1，就唔啱嚴格既文法，用左眾數樣既「神」做主詞，又用左單數既動詞「創造」。呢個情況類似英文既majestic plural，好似英（女）皇叫自己做we（朕）。
猶太拉比既討論入面，更加包括左點解某段經文既字，同其他地方唔同串法。用英文類比就係點解呢度寫color 果度寫colour。
個問題永遠都係對神既態度、對聖經既態度。
猶太拉比既討論入面，更加包括左點解某段經文既字，同其他地方唔同串法。用英文類比就係點解呢度寫color 果度寫colour。
個問題永遠都係對神既態度、對聖經既態度。
猶太人對名(shem)既理解，可以參考
https://ancient-hebrew.org/names/Shem.htm
https://ancient-hebrew.org/names/Shem.htm
We are not given much history of Shem or what type of person he was but his name does provide us with a clue. Unlike our names, a Hebrew's name was a word with meaning. This meaning was a reflection of the person himself and his character. The Hebrew word shem is most often translated as "name" and the name of Shem in English is Name.
The word shem means much more than just a name. A related word in Hebrew is the word neshemah meaning "breath". In the Hebrew mind the breath is much more than the exchange of air in the lungs but was the seat of one’s character. The word shem." is also used in the manner as seen in the passage below where the word "fame" is the Hebrew shem.
For he was wiser than all other men, wiser than Ethan the Ezrahite, and Heman, Calcol, and Darda, the sons of Mahol; and his fame was in all the nations round about. (1 Kings 4:31 RSV)
This is similar to our desire to "have a good name". This has nothing to do the actual name but the character of the one with the name.
黎巴又比人圍, 幾時輪到濛叔出場護主
黎教主又開始講大話啦... 唉, 成日講大話真係映衰晒基督徒呢個名.
黎教主一再強調要睇原文, 我哋就睇下希伯來文嘅Name (Shem)係唔係真係用緊唔同嘅字.
申命記18:5
Deu 18:5 For the LORD thy God hath chosen him out of all thy tribes, to stand to minister in the name of the LORD, him and his sons for ever.
source: https://biblehub.com/text/deuteronomy/18-5.htm
申命記18:20
Deu 18:20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.
source: https://biblehub.com/text/deuteronomy/18-20.htm
簡單拎住原文對比完, 原來不論係真神יְהוָ֛ה Yah-weh 定異教神別, 用名Name時都係用 שֵׁם šêm. 當然黎教主講大話被拆穿後又會開始講廢話. 大家可以買定花生睇黎教主表演用更多大話去死撐自己係啱.
黎教主一再強調要睇原文, 我哋就睇下希伯來文嘅Name (Shem)係唔係真係用緊唔同嘅字.
申命記18:5
Deu 18:5 For the LORD thy God hath chosen him out of all thy tribes, to stand to minister in the name of the LORD, him and his sons for ever.
source: https://biblehub.com/text/deuteronomy/18-5.htm
申命記18:20
Deu 18:20 But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.
source: https://biblehub.com/text/deuteronomy/18-20.htm
簡單拎住原文對比完, 原來不論係真神יְהוָ֛ה Yah-weh 定異教神別, 用名Name時都係用 שֵׁם šêm. 當然黎教主講大話被拆穿後又會開始講廢話. 大家可以買定花生睇黎教主表演用更多大話去死撐自己係啱.
黎教主好好地討論係唔得, 係要拋書包拎原文出嚟講, 但而家網絡咁發達, 隨便search下已經可以拆穿佢, 仲未計其他人真係識原文嘅人存在. 真係識嘅唔係好似佢咁拎住本神學書, 新教神學家話咩佢就信咩, 自己根本就唔識原文, qoute完人咃嘢就當自己識原文.
點解講大話做假見証張點心紙錯漏百出
呢本書資料充足，講香港會拜乜嘢神，佳哥出品必屬佳品，教會拎去慢慢抄啦
香港諸神：起源、廟宇與崇拜
https://www.chunghwabookstore.com/products/1-9789888758166
呢本書資料充足，講香港會拜乜嘢神，佳哥出品必屬佳品，教會拎去慢慢抄啦
香港諸神：起源、廟宇與崇拜
https://www.chunghwabookstore.com/products/1-9789888758166
濛巴之前又鳩叫，話大家批評教會都係想教會好，叫大家唔好淨係批評，批評得教會就要一齊建設佢哋嘅教會。然後俾眾巴絲又笑鳩佢弱智。佢同黎巴都係啲典型白卡社交溝通障礙嘅人，之後濛巴仲要一直唔知究竟自己柒喺邊，繼續問咁講有咩問題難怪平時都係兩個社交障礙白卡互相圍爐
嗰次俾人笑鳩完，濛巴好似比較少上水為黎巴護航連黎巴嗰啲一兩頁嘅傳教po，濛巴都開始唔去死撐
。佢同黎巴都係啲典型白卡社交溝通障礙嘅人，之後濛巴仲要一直唔知究竟自己柒喺邊，繼續問咁講有咩問題難怪平時都係兩個社交障礙白卡互相圍爐嗰次俾人笑鳩完，濛巴好似比較少上水為黎巴護航
連黎巴嗰啲一兩頁嘅傳教po，濛巴都開始唔去死撐
留名等睇教主黎巴繼續柒
順便提一提教主黎巴
得閒可以回應補充吓你個白卡精神病P1-6論證
或者個相信磁力論
Is the Trinity in the Bible?
making sure we are all on the same page when it comes to what the doctrine of the Trinity involves. This is important because a lot of people assume that if they see a passage in the Bible which mention God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit all in one verse or one passage (e.g., Matthew 28:19-20), or at least they infer the presence of all three in one passage, as Christian readers have long done, even in rather unexpected places – for example, the very first chapter of the Bible! (Genesis 1:1-2, 26) – that this is the doctrine of the Trinity. But no, it is not.
The Trinity is much more than just having these three beings named at once. It’s a distinct way of understanding the three in themselves and in relation to one another. The doctrine states that the Godhead is made up of three distinct persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These are not all the same person. They are three people. Moreover, each of these three persons is fully God. In fact, they are all equal to each other (no one is “superior” to the others) and they are made up of the “same substance.” And together, the three of them are the one God. That’s the doctrine. These three are one.
It is easy for non-Christians to laugh and call it nonsense. But the people who came up with the doctrine were not idiots. Most of the serious theologians who developed the full logic in the fourth and fifth centuries were deep thinkers and highly trained in philosophy. Many of them were smarter, frankly than you and me. Or at least me. They understood that the doctrine did not pass the normal standards of logic. And that applying those standards to it could not yield sense. If one of them were alive today and you suggested they were an idiot for believing an obviously contradictory view, they may well ask you how well versed you were in quantum physics.
https://ehrmanblog.org/is-the-trinity-in-the-bible/
making sure we are all on the same page when it comes to what the doctrine of the Trinity involves. This is important because a lot of people assume that if they see a passage in the Bible which mention God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit all in one verse or one passage (e.g., Matthew 28:19-20), or at least they infer the presence of all three in one passage, as Christian readers have long done, even in rather unexpected places – for example, the very first chapter of the Bible! (Genesis 1:1-2, 26) – that this is the doctrine of the Trinity. But no, it is not.
The Trinity is much more than just having these three beings named at once. It’s a distinct way of understanding the three in themselves and in relation to one another. The doctrine states that the Godhead is made up of three distinct persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These are not all the same person. They are three people. Moreover, each of these three persons is fully God. In fact, they are all equal to each other (no one is “superior” to the others) and they are made up of the “same substance.” And together, the three of them are the one God. That’s the doctrine. These three are one.
It is easy for non-Christians to laugh and call it nonsense. But the people who came up with the doctrine were not idiots. Most of the serious theologians who developed the full logic in the fourth and fifth centuries were deep thinkers and highly trained in philosophy. Many of them were smarter, frankly than you and me. Or at least me. They understood that the doctrine did not pass the normal standards of logic. And that applying those standards to it could not yield sense. If one of them were alive today and you suggested they were an idiot for believing an obviously contradictory view, they may well ask you how well versed you were in quantum physics.
https://ehrmanblog.org/is-the-trinity-in-the-bible/
我引用返上面，highlight 返：
我已經寫左同一個shem 字。
一樣都係講本質。
不過上主既本質，同別神既本質，係兩樣野：一個係神性，一個係虛無。我已經講左喇。
申命記18:20-22
//20 “‘但是，如果有先知擅自奉我的名說(ledabber dabar bishmi)我沒有吩咐他說的話(ledabber)，或是他奉別神的名說話(yedabber beshem elohim acherim)，那個先知就要處死。’
21 也許你心裡會想：‘我們怎麼知道耶和華沒有說(lo-dibbero)過這話(hadavar)呢？’
22 先知奉耶和華的名所說(yedabber beshem YHWH)的話(hadavar)若不成就，沒有實現，這話(hadavar)耶和華就沒有說(dibbero)過，是那先知擅自說(dibbero)的；你不要怕他。”//
我已經寫左同一個shem 字。
一樣都係講本質。
不過上主既本質，同別神既本質，係兩樣野：一個係神性，一個係虛無。我已經講左喇。
又嚟blue curtains 同一句廢話你講咗幾多次都係無用，一個無畀你洗腦嘅信徒係唔會見住完全一樣嘅字但就喺到blue curtains到同本質有關。而事實上你引用嘅聖經都無講到任何同本質有關嘅字。
啟示錄:22:18 我向一切聽見這書上預言的作見證，若有人在這預言上加添甚麼，神必將寫在這書上的災禍加在他身上。
黎教主，唔好再幫聖經添加嘢啦，悔改啦
又嚟玩原文遊戲，而家講緊name係任何name都用緊同一隻字都係單數，你就轉移視線拎住bishmi同beshem 嚟講。兩個都唔同一個subject但你就拎埋嚟講。為咗作假見證真係無所不用其極 ，悔改啦
同一句廢話你講咗幾多次都係無用，一個無畀你洗腦嘅信徒係唔會見住完全一樣嘅字但就喺到blue curtains到同本質有關。而事實上你引用嘅聖經都無講到任何同本質有關嘅字。啟示錄:22:18 我向一切聽見這書上預言的作見證，若有人在這預言上加添甚麼，神必將寫在這書上的災禍加在他身上。
黎教主，唔好再幫聖經添加嘢啦，悔改啦
又嚟玩原文遊戲，而家講緊name係任何name都用緊同一隻字都係單數，你就轉移視線拎住bishmi同beshem 嚟講。兩個都唔同一個subject但你就拎埋嚟講。為咗作假見證真係無所不用其極
，悔改啦再睇多啲黎教主點樣轉移視線，作假見證。
בִּשְׁמִ֗י (b'shmi):
This phrase is a combination of the preposition "בְּ" (b-) meaning "in" or "with," and the noun "שֵׁם" (shem) meaning "name." The addition of the suffix "ִי" (-i) indicates possession or association.
The entire phrase "בִּשְׁמִ֗י" can be translated as "in my name" or "with my name," emphasizing possession or association with a name.
בְּשֵׁ֖ם (b'shem):
This phrase is a combination of the preposition "בְּ" (b-) meaning "in" or "with," and the noun "שֵׁם" (shem) meaning "name."
The entire phrase "בְּשֵׁ֖ם" can be translated as "in the name of" or "with the name of," indicating the use of a name or authority.
兩個字都係shem做字根，只係因為一個係講my name一個係講the name，所以先有少少分別。但就畀黎教主blue curtains到講緊神嘅本質，神性同虛空
咁嘅解經法仲有咩係解唔到？唔使睇聖經啦你，自己解晒所有教義出嚟就得啦，信自己而唔係信神嘅黎教主
בִּשְׁמִ֗י (b'shmi):
This phrase is a combination of the preposition "בְּ" (b-) meaning "in" or "with," and the noun "שֵׁם" (shem) meaning "name." The addition of the suffix "ִי" (-i) indicates possession or association.
The entire phrase "בִּשְׁמִ֗י" can be translated as "in my name" or "with my name," emphasizing possession or association with a name.
בְּשֵׁ֖ם (b'shem):
This phrase is a combination of the preposition "בְּ" (b-) meaning "in" or "with," and the noun "שֵׁם" (shem) meaning "name."
The entire phrase "בְּשֵׁ֖ם" can be translated as "in the name of" or "with the name of," indicating the use of a name or authority.
兩個字都係shem做字根，只係因為一個係講my name一個係講the name，所以先有少少分別。但就畀黎教主blue curtains到講緊神嘅本質，神性同虛空
咁嘅解經法仲有咩係解唔到？唔使睇聖經啦你，自己解晒所有教義出嚟就得啦，信自己而唔係信神嘅黎教主
推
希望磁力黎教主繼續回應
希望磁力黎教主繼續回應
教主畀人拆穿咗就會潛水，反正佢有連登堂，個個星期都新POST，唔需要回應人，只需要圍爐打飛機開心就夠
叫你填申報都係市場調查吓啫
上面邊隻字話佢禁止？
上面邊隻字話佢禁止？
叫你填申報都係市場調查吓啫
上面邊隻字話佢禁止？
上面邊隻字話佢禁止？