我有投資開 金額都大 又要讀書想搞退稅慳多啲
加拿大報稅 你問我試答
唱紅打黑
1001 回覆
44 Like
7 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
你建唔建議初到埗 第一年搵人搞tax?
我有投資開 金額都大 又要讀書想搞退稅慳多啲
我有投資開 金額都大 又要讀書想搞退稅慳多啲
本身資產放係唔同國家，移民過去洗唔洗拎番香港先？
I understand that CRA always assume you are tax resident if you have one or more significant ties , coz CRA doesn’t want to loss any tax money.
But I assume there is some grey area?
In reply #563. Some of the cases you could be non tax resident, even with one or two significant ties with Canada .
But I assume there is some grey area?
In reply #563. Some of the cases you could be non tax resident, even with one or two significant ties with Canada .
no, 除非你有樓 幾十萬上落
or 你半路返香港搵錢打工
or other complicated cases
你搵人搞唔係cad 50 就得，越complicated 越貴
自己試下搞，搞唔掂上網問
or 你半路返香港搵錢打工
or other complicated cases
你搵人搞唔係cad 50 就得，越complicated 越貴
自己試下搞，搞唔掂上網問
當然唔洗
好想知我玩美股 賺蝕要mark低再兌返加紙
咁我係用trade當刻的匯率 定 最後一個lum sum 乘返報稅時的匯率
想追問一下
CAPITAL GAIN你話如果係計入境果日個價, 咁我當隻股票升左, 我入境後再做tax resident前賣左佢買返, 係咪就可以計返新買入價?
CAPITAL GAIN你話如果係計入境果日個價, 咁我當隻股票升左, 我入境後再做tax resident前賣左佢買返, 係咪就可以計返新買入價?
唔該巴打!
有冇人攞完pr唔賣股，strong hold到入完籍declare non resident返香港嗰日
其實有冇得請會計師幫手？
唔知邊度可以搵到？
唔知邊度可以搵到？
咁其實最好嘅避稅方法係咪就係去加拿大之前將啲股票過晒落屋企人戶口，再喺加拿大remote用佢哋戶口買賣 (假設屋企人選擇留港)
(假設屋企人選擇留港)
如果最後唔小心交漏左會點
好驚第一次自己搞有野錯
好驚第一次自己搞有野錯
When in doubt re-assess first.
Taxpayers who are selected for audit (most likely desk audit) will receive a letter from CRA. The letter may request additional information/documentation etc. They will tell you they will disallow certain expenses / claim and you have a chance to provide details to support your case. A decision will be made based on your submission to reassess or accept your position.
Taxpayer can appeal the reassessment within certain time frame and the taxpayer can go to Tax Court etc.
There are many "grey" that only the court can decide. I have one case that the corporate taxpayer had lost in the appeal lower court but won in the Supreme Court.
If there is doubt whether a taxpayer is non resident of not, chances are the auditor would disallow the non resident claim.
However the chance of being selected for audit is slim especially when the tax involve is not material. I don't know the threshold.
Canada has a honour system when it comes to tax filing. You may know many people who do this and that but never get caught. But I have seen many otherwise.
I can tell you what I think may happened but I can not predict CRA's probable action. I have been proven wrong in the past and I had proven some tax lawyers/tax specialist were wrong.
My advice is to hire a tax accountant if your case is complicated to save yourself most of the potential hassle. However, bear in mind that the professional will make suggestions based on your disclosure. Bear in mind that all position taken may be challenged by CRA.
Taxpayers who are selected for audit (most likely desk audit) will receive a letter from CRA. The letter may request additional information/documentation etc. They will tell you they will disallow certain expenses / claim and you have a chance to provide details to support your case. A decision will be made based on your submission to reassess or accept your position.
Taxpayer can appeal the reassessment within certain time frame and the taxpayer can go to Tax Court etc.
There are many "grey" that only the court can decide. I have one case that the corporate taxpayer had lost in the appeal lower court but won in the Supreme Court.
If there is doubt whether a taxpayer is non resident of not, chances are the auditor would disallow the non resident claim.
However the chance of being selected for audit is slim especially when the tax involve is not material. I don't know the threshold.
Canada has a honour system when it comes to tax filing. You may know many people who do this and that but never get caught. But I have seen many otherwise.
I can tell you what I think may happened but I can not predict CRA's probable action. I have been proven wrong in the past and I had proven some tax lawyers/tax specialist were wrong.
My advice is to hire a tax accountant if your case is complicated to save yourself most of the potential hassle. However, bear in mind that the professional will make suggestions based on your disclosure. Bear in mind that all position taken may be challenged by CRA.
When you landed
You are deemed to have disposed all your stock and re-acquire them at the fair market value (FMV).
Does what you suggested have any difference with the deeming provision? Except that you will pay commission to dispose and reacquire the same stock.
It's like removing your pants to you know what.
You are deemed to have disposed all your stock and re-acquire them at the fair market value (FMV).
Does what you suggested have any difference with the deeming provision? Except that you will pay commission to dispose and reacquire the same stock.
It's like removing your pants to you know what.
On the day you landed, you are deem to dispose of the shares at FMV and reacquire them at FMV. In this case you should have an appraisal to show the FMV on the day you landed. Or as close to the day as possible.
Yes. T1135 requires you report foreign own property.
Most likely reassess with interest penalty. However, if CRA determined that you are evading tax etc. Then the penalty can be 200% of the taxes and criminally charged on top of the interest penalty.
Accountant is NOT God.
They make suggestions based on how they interpret the Income Tax Act based on information you provide them. However, CRA may disagree with your accountant's position.
The case you mentioned is not worth your while to seek a tax lawyer.
They make suggestions based on how they interpret the Income Tax Act based on information you provide them. However, CRA may disagree with your accountant's position.
The case you mentioned is not worth your while to seek a tax lawyer.
