[member]呢到係咪得數撚[/member]
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
[member]呢到係咪得數撚[/member]
[member]呢到係咪得數撚[/member]
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
[member]堆PHY已經還返晒俾教授
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
[/member]
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
呢度個個都咁勁搭唔到咀 得個睇字
問下先 我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea ?
Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
完全唔同,construct rational number簡單好多
問下先 我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea ?
Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
完全唔同,construct rational number簡單好多
可唔可以講埋點解
問下先 我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea ?
Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
完全唔同,construct rational number簡單好多
可唔可以講埋點解
都係自己google下好d
問下先 我見本real analysis書有construct fields of real number from rational numbers
咁construct fields of rational numbers from integers唔係都應該係同一個idea ?
Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
完全唔同,construct rational number簡單好多
可唔可以講埋點解
都係自己google下好d
以為你話construct real number簡單好多
其實都係define同prove佢係個field
Rational number straight forward to define
Real number is not
Dedekind cut?
Real number係靠整個partition符合well ordering principle,archimedean property.
btw CS construct integer個方法都幾得意,{},{{}},{{{}}}...
完全唔同,construct rational number簡單好多
可唔可以講埋點解
都係自己google下好d
以為你話construct real number簡單好多
其實都係define同prove佢係個field
Rational number straight forward to define
Real number is not
點解而家先黎睇real analysis