200個證據證明地球不是一個轉動中的球體

第三隻眼

505 回覆
25 Like 257 Dislike
男user🙇🏻 2017-04-09 16:57:04
我覺得出呢啲書/講法既目的


其實係想大家小心求證

我地而家既知識好多9背返黎無自己思考

有時見到啲人想做論證既時候就好論盡同粗疏

我估係咁
真多膠 2017-04-09 17:03:25
[quote][quote][quote]15. 地球有gravity , 飛機本身已經唔可以完全抵抗地心吸力平飛果陣都好似要+3 度bank angle 先保持到高度.

唔知咁解釋啱唔啱

啱,但同一種力可以吸住唔同野,包括大氣層同海洋,加上對抗自轉產生既反作用力,咁海水入面應該會產生種好強既勢能,咁點解魚可以係海入一面游?

慣性定律

有冇考慮到地球既自轉?隻烏蠅係架行緊既巴士度向車尾飛係咪會飛極都唔撞?

都唔知話你天真定蠢好

咁要開幾快隻烏蠅先會撞車尾?
Okuram 2017-04-09 17:25:31
想問吓樓主
假設地球真係平嘅
點解政府/科學家要花咁多心機去話係圓嘅?
有咩目的/好處?
V=IR 2017-04-09 20:29:00
本書係證明地球唔係轉緊,唔係話地球係平既
話地球係靜止唔係轉緊唔一定話地球係平架喎

毒撚冇人理
Petrichor 2017-04-09 20:54:58
話地球係圓既人 試解釋呢張nasa影既相
V=IR 2017-04-09 20:56:46
https://youtu.be/XHGKIzCcVa0

由11:40開始睇起,你就明地球可能未必係球體,但係到至少一定係轉緊。

最岩反駁依個post
個個focus 落地球唔係平
但冇人知道個post一直講緊地球唔係轉緊
Petrichor 2017-04-09 20:57:38
https://youtu.be/6ll28f-k4K0

宇宙邊緣跳傘,唔通係CG?

求解釋哩條

魚眼鏡
Jalsij 2017-04-10 08:18:30
42) In the ball-Earth model Antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees South latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12,000 miles in circumference. Many early explorers including Captian Cook and James Clark Ross, however, in attempting Antarctic circumnavigation took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50-60,000 miles around. The British ship Challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of Antarctica traversing 69,000 miles. This is entirely inconsistent with the ball model.


相比起地平地轉,反而成日覺得北極下面空心呢個傳說好有趣
Jalsij 2017-04-10 08:24:48
https://youtu.be/XHGKIzCcVa0

由11:40開始睇起,你就明地球可能未必係球體,但係到至少一定係轉緊。

最岩反駁依個post
個個focus 落地球唔係平
但冇人知道個post一直講緊地球唔係轉緊


但事實係樓主post 個本書入面好多都真係講緊地平說 由其係去到四十幾講緊d飛行航線,唔知係樓主自己未睇曬定轉軑啦


例如呢段,點睇都似係講緊地平多過地轉

45) On a ball-Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean with convenient re-fueling possibilities on Mauritus or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong or Malaysia all of which make no sense on the ball, but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_2i19dhlBos/Vb-Kxf4brqI/AAAAAAAAP-k/bdLSTB81rl0/s1600/sa-perth.jpg
唐偉章 2017-04-10 08:28:31
https://youtu.be/XHGKIzCcVa0

由11:40開始睇起,你就明地球可能未必係球體,但係到至少一定係轉緊。

最岩反駁依個post
個個focus 落地球唔係平
但冇人知道個post一直講緊地球唔係轉緊


但事實係樓主post 個本書入面好多都真係講緊地平說 由其係去到四十幾講緊d飛行航線,唔知係樓主自己未睇曬定轉軑啦


例如呢段,點睇都似係講緊地平多過地轉

45) On a ball-Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean with convenient re-fueling possibilities on Mauritus or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong or Malaysia all of which make no sense on the ball, but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_2i19dhlBos/Vb-Kxf4brqI/AAAAAAAAP-k/bdLSTB81rl0/s1600/sa-perth.jpg

樓主post 出嚟嘅1,2,6-10點都好似係講緊地平說
Jalsij 2017-04-10 08:31:42
42) In the ball-Earth model Antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees South latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12,000 miles in circumference. Many early explorers including Captian Cook and James Clark Ross, however, in attempting Antarctic circumnavigation took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50-60,000 miles around. The British ship Challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of Antarctica traversing 69,000 miles. This is entirely inconsistent with the ball model.


相比起地平地轉,反而成日覺得南極下面空心呢個傳說好有趣
Jalsij 2017-04-10 08:34:11
https://youtu.be/XHGKIzCcVa0

由11:40開始睇起,你就明地球可能未必係球體,但係到至少一定係轉緊。

最岩反駁依個post
個個focus 落地球唔係平
但冇人知道個post一直講緊地球唔係轉緊


但事實係樓主post 個本書入面好多都真係講緊地平說 由其係去到四十幾講緊d飛行航線,唔知係樓主自己未睇曬定轉軑啦


例如呢段,點睇都似係講緊地平多過地轉

45) On a ball-Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean with convenient re-fueling possibilities on Mauritus or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong or Malaysia all of which make no sense on the ball, but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_2i19dhlBos/Vb-Kxf4brqI/AAAAAAAAP-k/bdLSTB81rl0/s1600/sa-perth.jpg

樓主post 出嚟嘅1,2,6-10點都好似係講緊地平說


唔知幾時變左剩係講地轉之後屌人剩係駁地平
見習幼獅 2017-04-10 08:55:30
樓主好撚慘 post上黎討論下都俾人圍
がっきー 2017-04-10 09:10:11
樓主好撚慘 post上黎討論下都俾人圍

你望下佢個fb link,根本全部都講緊哩類野,你以為佢真係「學術」討論?
櫻紫螢 2017-04-10 09:25:17
樓主好撚慘 post上黎討論下都俾人圍


我覺得討論嚟都嘥氣
而家唔係講緊地心說喎
地心說係喺16定唔知15世紀先比人推翻

而家講緊地平說 都已經公元前就比人推翻左
你覺得咁多年
Newton Einstein Young 佢地一個都無發現到
竟然會比你發現到?

咁又唔好咁講
我都認同我地現今個思考方向係俾前人既發現規限。
科學就係要大膽假設,小心求證。
中學IS都有教,一個scientific fact 係要經過幾個步驟先可以establish 1. Discovered a fact 2. Proposed a theory 3. Experiment 4. Analyse the result 5. Prove
上面地平說既講法好多都欠缺3 4 5既支持,而且有時候佢地連個fact 本身都係錯
所以叫做偽科一啲都唔過份
晴日 2017-04-10 09:35:55

衛星發射同進入近地軌道
一舊膠買起你 2017-04-10 11:12:02
樓主繼續 我未笑完
日日跪玻璃 2017-04-10 11:31:29
on9咁既話地球d風點黎

你就ON9, 如果風係由地球轉動所造成,點解唔同季節會吹唔同方向嘅風?
係由於熱空氣上升以致氣壓改變,從高氣壓流向低氣壓,所以有風

我係咪真心左
YoshiokaYUI 2017-04-10 21:02:32
屌睇左咁多頁都唔知做緊乜撚
9唔搭8講完一論話引真心
真正令討論質素下降就係你d撚屌
妳是我心上人 2017-04-10 23:55:16
屌你老味真係睇多兩句都變弱智
妳是我心上人 2017-04-10 23:59:21
屌你老母地球唔撚轉動點撚樣睇到東升西落呀?
點睇到陰晴圓缺?
點睇到日夜交替?

定係你想回歸地心說
冚家鏟圍住地球呢個定點黎轉?
朗尼稱霸🇨🇳 2017-04-13 12:36:08
樓主潛到落地核?

丫 sor9ly
地平説根本無地核
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞