【7警裁決】全部傷人罪脫，但全部襲擊罪成。

屌那係唔係緩刑吓話，知法犯法唔係判重 d 架咩

7警最可恥嘅係敢做唔敢認， 頭頂仲要鑿住【正義】兩個大字， 身為反黑， O記高層為求脫罪用盡下三流手段， 同睇戲一樣， 用盡黑社會脫罪手法， 只不過今次竟然係角色調換， 變成口稱【正義】嘅反黑警員， 真係諷刺之極

上訴又拖一年

七隻棄棋當拉民心，班七警以為真係保你，你地係用完即棄咋，年年一車車咁入學堂呀

坐唔坐監唔係重點
重點係個阻嚇作用 班柒頭以後識得醒醒定定如果唔係工都冇埋

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/news/20160923/55686621

大把地方請返佢地

應該係傷人19輕d
利申：criminal law低空飛過

傷人19 一樣要啪 ，無得判緩刑

而家係入傷人39

Convicted after trial 炆水啲囉。
不過佢哋都未做 mitigation, 聽埋先知

766. Having carefully considered the medical evidence and the photographs of the injuries, I am not satisfied the injuries to the face; the left side of the neck; the left shoulder and clavicle; the left flank and the right flank and the circular reddish bruises on the back and chest, when viewed collectively, albeit extensive, constitute grievous bodily harm.

cannot sound more absurd...

係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯

屌那係唔係緩刑吓話，知法犯法唔係判重 d 架咩

身為差佬會係加刑因素

仲有佢地之前無認罪
所以唔會有減刑

想留到份長糧俾佢地退休?

咁樣打法都可以甩傷人㗎咩？
有冇讀法律巴打可以解答吓

好多因素
睇現場環境證據
睇雙方供詞等等
好多野都可以影響個官判決

利申:黑警抵撚死

無計，CCTVB唔肯合作

都夠無得撈?

呢d有刑事紀錄就肯定無得撈

如果係真，真係要有請小鳳姐

有退休警官向本報指出，紀律程序中的警告、落行為簿，幾乎可以肯定不會影響長俸退休金，即使毆打罪成亦很少影響長俸，除非警員的刑事罪行涉及貪污等嚴重罪行。保安局局長黎棟國亦曾表示，一般退休公務員如被裁定干犯某些罪行，而該罪行亦被特首核證為對香港已造成嚴重損害，或可能令人對公職服務大失信心，政府可取消、暫停支付或扣減該公職人員的退休金。

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20161208/19858694


即係話，如果坐幾碌既，唔會影響黑警份長俸

黑警局長又唔出泥講下野

刑期唔係重點 重點係要有案底

即時還押

朱sir呢

766. Having carefully considered the medical evidence and the photographs of the injuries, I am not satisfied the injuries to the face; the left side of the neck; the left shoulder and clavicle; the left flank and the right flank and the circular reddish bruises on the back and chest, when viewed collectively, albeit extensive, constitute grievous bodily harm.

cannot sound more absurd...

係唔係GBH都係個官自己判斷所以⋯

所以某程度上擺39做alternative charge 做保險啲嘅做法
擺19隨時甩哂

睇緊reason for judgment

但Dufton 拋得佢應該唔會考慮非監禁刑罰，High Court precedent 講明如果法官會考慮suspended sentence or CSO or PO, 係應該allow bail pending sentences. 咁大疊QC SC喺度，呢啲唔會走雞