其實有冇啲 estoppel by convention 嘅 point 可以 run
不過個問題似乎係就算 SC is estopped from denying the stated sum vis a vis 個買家,呢個 common understanding 唔會 bind SC vis a vis 個業主,而銀行唔出 discharge/release 呢個決定,只係同業主 inter se 嘅 transaction
又或者 negligent misstatement,SC 嘅 statement 好明顯出嚟係 to be relied upon by 個買家
另一方面,條片講到買家可以踢契攞返訂金,即係 rescind 埋張 spa? 如果係 rescission 咁應該有 proprietary claim to 嗰邊訂金 (如果未洗走),唔係一般 general creditor
如果業主已經洗咗筆訂金,咁都可以 insolvency claw back set aside 嗰個 transaction?