美國心臟協會: 8 小時限時飲食會使心血管死亡風險增加 91%

218 回覆
123 Like 32 Dislike
2024-03-20 13:49:37
8 小時限時飲食會使心血管死亡風險增加 91%
美國心臟協會流行病學和預防|生活方式和心臟代謝健康科學會議 2024 年,摘要 P192

一項針對 20,000 多名成年人的研究發現,那些遵循 8 小時限時飲食計劃(一種間歇性斷食)的人,死於心血管疾病的風險增加 91%。
患有心臟病或癌症的人心血管死亡的風險也增加。
與每天 12-16 小時的標準飲食計劃相比,將每天的食物攝取量限制在 8 小時以下與壽命延長無關。

仲做唔做 168 斷食好??

https://newsroom.heart.org/news/8-hour-time-restricted-eating-linked-to-a-91-higher-risk-of-cardiovascular-death

2024-03-20 13:59:21
冇抵觸
會瘦啲健康啲
不過短命啲
2024-03-20 14:00:42
做左5年
2024-03-20 14:01:43
依d研究幾年就推翻自己一次
2024-03-20 14:03:57
斷食唔係不嬲話對癌症係好
2024-03-20 14:05:34
咁正常9點食早餐,7點食晚餐都係10個鐘食晒
2024-03-20 14:08:13
每日2餐炸雞算唔算間歇性斷食
2024-03-20 14:11:54
死左最瘦
2024-03-20 14:15:21
輝瑞出錢嘅假報告掩飾毒針嘅禍害

2024-03-20 14:16:49
科學係咁㗎啦
2024-03-20 14:17:54
連登神探
2024-03-20 14:22:16
見佢寫Risks已經可以無視
2024-03-20 14:23:13
唔怪得古人咁早死
2024-03-20 14:23:58
91% 呢個數好虛,講緊本身可能冇做既,1000個有1個人出事,做左816就1000個有2個人出事咁上下,呢隻數已經叫上升左100%
2024-03-20 14:24:34
屌你班垃圾專家又想呃人食多D冇咁健康,醫藥陰謀黎
2024-03-20 14:24:41
之前D POST連燈仔話168 100%有效, 吹到上天, 梗係信連燈仔啦, 唔通你信美國心臟協會?
2024-03-20 14:25:19
所以中東人好短命
2024-03-20 14:25:32
The study’s limitations included its reliance on self-reported dietary information, which may be affected by participant’s memory or recall and may not accurately assess typical eating patterns. Factors that may also play a role in health, outside of daily duration of eating and cause of death, were not included in the analysis.

Can fuck right off there
2024-03-20 14:28:48
2024-03-20 14:34:05
搵我小龍哥訂位,送無限時任飲任食!
2024-03-20 14:34:58
美國心臟協會 糖尿病協會
呢啲全部背後有金主贊助
金主想賺咩錢 想打擊邊個產業
全部都影響份報告
所以信不信由你
2024-03-20 14:36:05
They reviewed information about dietary patterns for participants in the annual 2003-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) in comparison to data about people who died in the U.S., from 2003 through December 2019, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Death Index database.

其實係咪apple to apple?年齡層唔同已經可以爭好遠。
2024-03-20 14:36:31
2024-03-20 14:38:29
“One of those details involves the nutrient quality of the diets typical of the different subsets of participants. Without this information, it cannot be determined if nutrient density might be an alternate explanation to the findings that currently focus on the window of time for eating. Second, it needs to be emphasized that categorization into the different windows of time-restricted eating was determined on the basis of just two days of dietary intake,” he said.
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞