You lost the debate and try to bring in other topics to direct the discussion away.
HaHaHello2021-01-19 09:39:18
It is the Trump supporters who bring in the absolute number of votes into this discussion.
I agree that their opinion is meaningless.
AskRob2021-01-19 09:39:25
What I am talking abt is
1. Mail in ballot have higher risk to create loop holes than in person
2. massive amount of mail in ballot will create massive risk of election fraud
3. It is useless to say all evidence. I just trust result from high %+in person vote.
方國珊(已失業)2021-01-19 09:39:49
唔撚識打中文就咪撚上連登啦
中文又唔識打 英文又唔掂 論點都1999
一艘沉沒的船2021-01-19 09:40:47
120%
電話無啦2021-01-19 09:41:12
This is simply not true. If it was true , the judges in the Supreme Courtwill would have overturned the election.
Even most of the judges are conservatives and some of them were appointed by Trump, they all rejected the claim of unfair election.
賈雨村2021-01-19 09:42:16
唔好咁肉酸啦
拜登而家咪一樣多過晒佢地
HaHaHello2021-01-19 09:42:33
The best poll has correctly predicted the one who won the President election since 2000. So this poll is really good.
Some of the polls are very bad but some of them are really good. So your comment is simply wrong.
AskRob2021-01-19 09:43:10
different story
lowest appoval rate contradict to second highest absolute vote, higher than what the same person got 4 years ago who have higher approval rate
Not so relevant to compare absolute vote in 1 v 1 president election because the system itself only count electrol college vote, not popular vote.
香港國際雞場2021-01-19 09:43:24
烏大龜Hi
乜你啲英文屎左咁撚多
HaHaHello2021-01-19 09:44:27
You lost the debate so you pick other topics to draw the attention away from the discussion.
Stick to the original topics.
苗栗國2021-01-19 09:45:40
投票率多咗成10%
HaHaHello2021-01-19 09:46:38
I hate China more than everyone of you. So I refuse to learn how to type Chinese. You like Chinese so much that you should go to China.