個撚個係哂第一個stage 仲以為自己好撚醒
連登仔睇少D大紀元、郭文貴，fox同朱利亞尼啦
本ど終勝
298 回覆
493 Like
156 Dislike
兒登仔真係好撚有自信
個撚個係哂第一個stage 仲以為自己好撚醒
個撚個係哂第一個stage 仲以為自己好撚醒
5毛左好耐
兒登仔來來去去一唔夠人駁一接受唔到現實就會玩Ad hominem 屈毛屈左膠架喇
成鳩日淨係講到CNN 左膠
我次次拎親BBC Reuters 同埋Research paper 之類嘅英文source 出來佢地就hang撚哂機架喇
成鳩日淨係講到CNN 左膠
我次次拎親BBC Reuters 同埋Research paper 之類嘅英文source 出來佢地就hang撚哂機架喇
睇The Sun 同 Daily Mail
早響啦 尋日有人好有興趣
你twitter揾dan garratt (好似係咁串)
佢有出席美帝HK act hearing
你twitter揾dan garratt (好似係咁串)
佢有出席美帝HK act hearing
WaPo一樣好撚癲
epoch times根本係外國個網絡好勁好有規模
仲比tankies支共老屈做far right
你就知有料到
仲比tankies支共老屈做far right
你就知有料到
推 黃之鋒：泰國網民無法聯署，由奶茶聯盟接手聯署 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區 https://lih.kg/2248818
你?
https://lihkg.com/thread/2225960/page/4
明明就係班差佬衝去佢架電單車度佢就同人哋講係佢撞落差佬度。
明明就係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟，佢就係話因為國安法令到人唔出嚟。
你條戇鳩葉劉用假料去幫中共大外宣, 竟然講到係
"又係唔岩聽就歪理propaganda"
兒登仔來來去去一唔夠人駁一接受唔到現實就會玩Ad hominem 屈毛屈左膠架喇?
算鳩掃把啦你
唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
講大話變唔啱聽, 真係勁到呢
https://lihkg.com/thread/2225960/page/4
明明就係班差佬衝去佢架電單車度佢就同人哋講係佢撞落差佬度。
明明就係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟，佢就係話因為國安法令到人唔出嚟。
你條戇鳩葉劉用假料去幫中共大外宣, 竟然講到係
"又係唔岩聽就歪理propaganda"
兒登仔來來去去一唔夠人駁一接受唔到現實就會玩Ad hominem 屈毛屈左膠架喇?
算鳩掃把啦你
唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
講大話變唔啱聽, 真係勁到呢
又係你條撚屌
講來講去都係個味
俾我講撚中係咪好撚唔gur
攞篇opinion 出來打飛機屌人奶共
你鳩撚夠未
唔講真係以為你條柒頭連咩係opinion 咩係state run propaganda 都未知呀
講來講去都係個味
俾我講撚中係咪好撚唔gur
攞篇opinion 出來打飛機屌人奶共
你鳩撚夠未
唔講真係以為你條柒頭連咩係opinion 咩係state run propaganda 都未知呀
真係慘, 咩叫 PROGANDA 呢? 你咁鍾意 BBC:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zqhyb9q/articles/zhw3jhv#:~:text=What%20is%20propaganda%3F,beat%20them%20in%20the%20war.
Propaganda is used to try to make people think a certain way.
Stories about bad things the Germans had done were told to make people angry and frightened so everyone would want Britain to beat them in the war.
But many tales were untrue and Germany told the same stories about Britain.
答我啦,
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你條傻仔以為我用 Daily Telegraph 退過晒所有中國宣傳廣告就執到寶https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2020/apr/14/daily-telegraph-stops-publishing-section-paid-for-by-china
就想幫 Propaganda 加料做 State-run Propaganda.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/01/opinion/hong-kong-china-security-law.html 你可以認同葉劉話佢既係 true 架:
Only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
Beijing isn’t actually encroaching on Hong Kong’s semi-autonomy by taking measures to proscribe subversive activities in the city.
The scale and frequency of antigovernment protests has now subsided — thanks to a national security law for Hong Kong promulgated in Beijing on June 30.
By Regina Ip
Ms. Ip is a legislator and a member of the Executive Council in Hong Kong
***********************************************************
Ad Hominem? 兒登仔屈毛屈左膠? 你所嘗唔係一撚樣鍾意老作標籤
OH 係呀咩叫 News vs Opinion vs Propaganda?
https://newslit.org/educators/civic-blog/distinguishing-among-news-opinion-and-propaganda/
“Opinion” presents a specific perspective on a topic or issue. While it may use emotional appeals to persuade readers, viewers or listeners to consider the position it’s arguing for (or against), the message includes verifiable facts and evidence. That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning. In addition, other perspectives and positions may be presented for balance and contrast. The best opinion pieces use facts and coherent arguments to explain why we should agree with the position.
“Propaganda” has a wide variety of definitions. The most important elements of propaganda are that it speaks to our fears and insecurities, it distorts and manipulates facts and information, it often includes falsehoods and it’s one-sided. Propaganda most commonly uses logical fallacies in its efforts to persuade — especially attacks on opponents and strong emotional appeals.
Propaganda also uses misinformation and disinformation. While students often think of these as synonymous, there is an important distinction: Does the person who is sharing the information believe that it’s true, or does he or she know that it’s false but is sharing it anyway? The former is misinformation, the latter is disinformation. Propaganda uses both.
死撐一篇大外宣做 Opinion
中共真係要多謝你呢為智將 
記住唔好忘記答我,
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/zqhyb9q/articles/zhw3jhv#:~:text=What%20is%20propaganda%3F,beat%20them%20in%20the%20war.
Propaganda is used to try to make people think a certain way.
Stories about bad things the Germans had done were told to make people angry and frightened so everyone would want Britain to beat them in the war.
But many tales were untrue and Germany told the same stories about Britain.
答我啦,
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你條傻仔以為我用 Daily Telegraph 退過晒所有中國宣傳廣告就執到寶https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2020/apr/14/daily-telegraph-stops-publishing-section-paid-for-by-china
就想幫 Propaganda 加料做 State-run Propaganda.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/01/opinion/hong-kong-china-security-law.html 你可以認同葉劉話佢既係 true 架:
Only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
Beijing isn’t actually encroaching on Hong Kong’s semi-autonomy by taking measures to proscribe subversive activities in the city.
The scale and frequency of antigovernment protests has now subsided — thanks to a national security law for Hong Kong promulgated in Beijing on June 30.
By Regina Ip
Ms. Ip is a legislator and a member of the Executive Council in Hong Kong
***********************************************************
Ad Hominem? 兒登仔屈毛屈左膠? 你所嘗唔係一撚樣鍾意老作標籤
OH 係呀咩叫 News vs Opinion vs Propaganda?
https://newslit.org/educators/civic-blog/distinguishing-among-news-opinion-and-propaganda/
“Opinion” presents a specific perspective on a topic or issue. While it may use emotional appeals to persuade readers, viewers or listeners to consider the position it’s arguing for (or against), the message includes verifiable facts and evidence. That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning. In addition, other perspectives and positions may be presented for balance and contrast. The best opinion pieces use facts and coherent arguments to explain why we should agree with the position.
“Propaganda” has a wide variety of definitions. The most important elements of propaganda are that it speaks to our fears and insecurities, it distorts and manipulates facts and information, it often includes falsehoods and it’s one-sided. Propaganda most commonly uses logical fallacies in its efforts to persuade — especially attacks on opponents and strong emotional appeals.
Propaganda also uses misinformation and disinformation. While students often think of these as synonymous, there is an important distinction: Does the person who is sharing the information believe that it’s true, or does he or she know that it’s false but is sharing it anyway? The former is misinformation, the latter is disinformation. Propaganda uses both.
死撐一篇大外宣做 Opinion
中共真係要多謝你呢為智將 記住唔好忘記答我,
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你呢條低能仔真係邏輯錯撚唒仲以為自己好撚醒
準備好個屎忽未？
同你講緊乜柒係Propaganda 呀？你俾條source 出來想玩false equivalence 柒撚到咁仲想笑人執到寶
The Daily Telegraph has stopped publishing paid-for propaganda on behalf of Chinese state media, amid growing scrutiny of how Beijing is using the pandemic to grow its influence in English-language media aimed at western audiences.
The long-running China Watch section, funded by the government-controlled China Daily news outlet, has appeared in the Telegraph for more than a decade. The content, written by Chinese state journalists, presents relentlessly upbeat views on China’s standing in the world in both print supplements and on a branded section of the Telegraph’s website.
仲想攞legislator and a member of the Executive Council in Hong Kong來比人地state media journalist
你真係唔撚識分咩係state run 咩係opinion
真係怪唔得兒登仔成日攞撐侵嘅opinion 出來打哂飛機當係真source
擺條link 出來同我定義咩係propaganda 題都未撚對到仲以為自己好撚醒
答你老母
依家同你講緊佢嘅opinion 係岩定錯呀？你訓撚醒未？依家就係講緊呢個係opinion section 人人都可以寫份opinion 登上去呀
你條柒頭係咪唔撚知乜柒係opinion 呀？
An op-ed, short for "opposite the editorial page" or as a backronym the "opinions and editorials page", is a written prose piece typically published by a newspaper or magazine which expresses the opinion of an author usually not affiliated with the publication's editorial board.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Op-ed
An opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement that is not conclusive, rather than facts which are true statements.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion
你條傻仔真係唔識英文
quote 撚埋出來仲扮盲
仲要攞人地獨立分比state media 嘅section 出來比佢一篇opinion
真係好撚柒
係呀駁撚完你班垃圾咪有資格標籤你做垃圾囉
你班撚屌駁唔到直頭第一句就屈毛喇
OH 原來你條低能仔真係唔識英文
你quote 埋出來就岩喇
a specific perspective on a topic or issue - checked
the message includes verifiable facts and evidence - 係葉劉嘅角度 - That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning - checked
other perspectives and positions may be presented for balance and contrast - 出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那喇盲撚
兒登仔嘅reasoning 就係reasoning
俾支那洗左腦嘅reasoning 就唔係reasoning
Manipulates facts？
你真係唔識英文
答我啦柒頭
And only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
呢一個人係咪俾人用呢條罪起訴呀？
佢同你討論緊邊個撞邊個呀？
佢同你講緊有人俾人用呢一條罪來起訴呀傻系
你真係以為你講乜柒就係乜柒
事實上係2 樣都有份
你想駁d 咩呀低能仔
你想俾人屌闊個屎忽咪出聲囉
死撐一篇個人opinion 做大外宣 中共真係要多謝你呢d 冇腦唔撚識思考嘅兒登仔喇
準備好個屎忽未？
咩叫 PROPAGANDA 呢?
同你講緊乜柒係Propaganda 呀？你俾條source 出來想玩false equivalence 柒撚到咁仲想笑人執到寶
The Daily Telegraph has stopped publishing paid-for propaganda on behalf of Chinese state media, amid growing scrutiny of how Beijing is using the pandemic to grow its influence in English-language media aimed at western audiences.
The long-running China Watch section, funded by the government-controlled China Daily news outlet, has appeared in the Telegraph for more than a decade. The content, written by Chinese state journalists, presents relentlessly upbeat views on China’s standing in the world in both print supplements and on a branded section of the Telegraph’s website.
仲想攞legislator and a member of the Executive Council in Hong Kong來比人地state media journalist
你真係唔撚識分咩係state run 咩係opinion
真係怪唔得兒登仔成日攞撐侵嘅opinion 出來打哂飛機當係真source
擺條link 出來同我定義咩係propaganda 題都未撚對到仲以為自己好撚醒
答我啦
你可以認同葉劉話佢既係 true 架:
答你老母
依家同你講緊佢嘅opinion 係岩定錯呀？你訓撚醒未？依家就係講緊呢個係opinion section 人人都可以寫份opinion 登上去呀
你條柒頭係咪唔撚知乜柒係opinion 呀？
An op-ed, short for "opposite the editorial page" or as a backronym the "opinions and editorials page", is a written prose piece typically published by a newspaper or magazine which expresses the opinion of an author usually not affiliated with the publication's editorial board.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Op-ed
An opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement that is not conclusive, rather than facts which are true statements.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion
你條傻仔以為我用 Daily Telegraph 退過晒所有中國宣傳廣告就執到寶
你條傻仔真係唔識英文
quote 撚埋出來仲扮盲
仲要攞人地獨立分比state media 嘅section 出來比佢一篇opinion
真係好撚柒
你所嘗唔係一撚樣鍾意老作標籤
係呀
駁撚完你班垃圾咪有資格標籤你做垃圾囉你班撚屌駁唔到直頭第一句就屈毛喇
OH 係呀咩叫 News vs Opinion vs Propaganda?
OH 原來你條低能仔真係唔識英文
你quote 埋出來就岩喇
a specific perspective on a topic or issue - checked
the message includes verifiable facts and evidence - 係葉劉嘅角度 - That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning - checked
other perspectives and positions may be presented for balance and contrast - 出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那喇盲撚
兒登仔嘅reasoning 就係reasoning
俾支那洗左腦嘅reasoning 就唔係reasoning
Manipulates facts？
你真係唔識英文
答我啦柒頭
And only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
呢一個人係咪俾人用呢條罪起訴呀？
佢同你討論緊邊個撞邊個呀？
佢同你講緊有人俾人用呢一條罪來起訴呀傻系
係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你真係以為你講乜柒就係乜柒
事實上係2 樣都有份
你想駁d 咩呀低能仔
你想俾人屌闊個屎忽咪出聲囉
死撐一篇個人opinion 做大外宣
中共真係要多謝你呢d 冇腦唔撚識思考嘅兒登仔喇*** Propaganda ***
救命呀, 原來真係瀨共閪黎答唔到就答你老母嬲嬲豬.
重係到當執到寶, 開門叫你老母睇下我打左咩先啦傻仔.
你條傻仔以為我用 Daily Telegraph 退過晒所有中國宣傳廣告就執到寶https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2020/apr/14/daily-telegraph-stops-publishing-section-paid-for-by-china
就想幫 Propaganda 加料做 State-run Propaganda.
結果你真係重係 "State-Run" 上面死纏難打.
State-Run Media 係咪中國建制一部份呀.
Executive Council in Hong Kong 係咪香港建制一部份呀.
戇鳩仔, 我一做講咗你幫 Propaganda 加料做 State Run Propaganda 啦.
可惜 Propaganda 唔一定要係 State Run 架懵撚
何況葉劉係用 Executive Council in Hong Kong 既身份出文架傻仔
*** Opinion ***
垃圾, 問你第三次啦,
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你咁撚鐘意 BBC 你 quote 乜撚野 Wiki 呀? BBC寫撚到明呀:
What is propaganda?
Propaganda is used to try to make people think a certain way.
.... But many tales were untrue and Germany told the same stories about Britain.
你肯開你個金口答:
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你咁撚鐘意 BBC, 家下唔啱聽就 Quote Wiki?
屌你老母重要幫葉劉兜話:
係葉劉嘅角度 - That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning - checked. 葉劉個閪係你頭頂啦, 快 d 瀨乾淨去啦. HAHAHA.
你咁撚講, 共產黨都係自己既角度啦傻閪.
重要 Checked 自己打飛機咁撚戇鳩.
"出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那喇盲撚" 呢點重撚戇鳩, 中共最撚毒就係十樣野八樣正常但係一兩樣係毒, 出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那就等如唔係大外宣?
答我啦:
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
問你到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度你就 Twist 去用咩罪告
柒到最尾都重要同葉劉瀨話係 Opinions
重有送你一句
"系你老母呀"
救命呀, 原來真係瀨共閪黎答唔到就答你老母嬲嬲豬.重係到當執到寶, 開門叫你老母睇下我打左咩先啦傻仔.
你條傻仔以為我用 Daily Telegraph 退過晒所有中國宣傳廣告就執到寶https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2020/apr/14/daily-telegraph-stops-publishing-section-paid-for-by-china
就想幫 Propaganda 加料做 State-run Propaganda.
結果你真係重係 "State-Run" 上面死纏難打.
State-Run Media 係咪中國建制一部份呀.
Executive Council in Hong Kong 係咪香港建制一部份呀.
戇鳩仔, 我一做講咗你幫 Propaganda 加料做 State Run Propaganda 啦.
可惜 Propaganda 唔一定要係 State Run 架懵撚
何況葉劉係用 Executive Council in Hong Kong 既身份出文架傻仔 *** Opinion ***
垃圾, 問你第三次啦,
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你咁撚鐘意 BBC 你 quote 乜撚野 Wiki 呀? BBC寫撚到明呀:
What is propaganda?
Propaganda is used to try to make people think a certain way.
.... But many tales were untrue and Germany told the same stories about Britain.
你肯開你個金口答:
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你咁撚鐘意 BBC, 家下唔啱聽就 Quote Wiki?
屌你老母重要幫葉劉兜話:
係葉劉嘅角度 - That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning - checked. 葉劉個閪係你頭頂啦, 快 d 瀨乾淨去啦. HAHAHA.
你咁撚講, 共產黨都係自己既角度啦傻閪.
重要 Checked 自己打飛機咁撚戇鳩."出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那喇盲撚" 呢點重撚戇鳩, 中共最撚毒就係十樣野八樣正常但係一兩樣係毒, 出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那就等如唔係大外宣?
答我啦:
1. 到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度?
2. 係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
問你到底係香港警察衝去部電單車到定係佢撞落差佬度你就 Twist 去用咩罪告
柒到最尾都重要同葉劉瀨話係 Opinions
重有送你一句
"系你老母呀"
做多左喇
重有呀傻仔, 有時間去 Google "Regina Ip Propaganda" 啦.
哎屌, 我幫你搵埋條 Link, 你 Click 落去就得:
https://www.google.com/search?client=opera-gx&q=regina+ip+propaganda&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/519262-nyt-opinion-piece-backing-chinas-crackdown-in-hong-kong-sparks-backlash
NYT opinion piece backing China's crackdown in Hong Kong sparks backlash
原來 Rick Scott 係連登仔唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
Rick Scott @SenRickScott
This is shameful. Once again, the @nytimes publishes propaganda from Communist China that’s attempting to cover up the CCP’s human rights violations.
The people of Hong Kong are fighting for the basic human rights they were promised.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-new-york-times-groveled-over-tom-cottons-oped-but-happily-publishes-chinese-communist-propaganda/ar-BB19Cum8
The New York Times groveled over Tom Cotton's oped but happily publishes Chinese Communist propaganda
https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/01/new-york-times-china-propaganda-hong-kong/
New York Times Publishes Pro-Beijing Official’s Op-Ed Praising Crackdown On Hong Kong Protesters
重有你條傻仔最鐘意既紅色 Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/China/comments/j4vpbz/pro_beijing_hong_kong_politician_regina_ip_writes/
OH SORRY Remove 咗
哎屌, 我幫你搵埋條 Link, 你 Click 落去就得:
https://www.google.com/search?client=opera-gx&q=regina+ip+propaganda&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/519262-nyt-opinion-piece-backing-chinas-crackdown-in-hong-kong-sparks-backlash
NYT opinion piece backing China's crackdown in Hong Kong sparks backlash
原來 Rick Scott 係連登仔唔岩聽就歪理propaganda
Rick Scott @SenRickScott
This is shameful. Once again, the @nytimes publishes propaganda from Communist China that’s attempting to cover up the CCP’s human rights violations.
The people of Hong Kong are fighting for the basic human rights they were promised.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-new-york-times-groveled-over-tom-cottons-oped-but-happily-publishes-chinese-communist-propaganda/ar-BB19Cum8
The New York Times groveled over Tom Cotton's oped but happily publishes Chinese Communist propaganda
https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/01/new-york-times-china-propaganda-hong-kong/
New York Times Publishes Pro-Beijing Official’s Op-Ed Praising Crackdown On Hong Kong Protesters
重有你條傻仔最鐘意既紅色 Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/China/comments/j4vpbz/pro_beijing_hong_kong_politician_regina_ip_writes/
OH SORRY Remove 咗
連登已變左另類小粉紅
救命呀, 原來真係冇腦唔撚識思考嘅兒登仔答唔到就答你老母嬲嬲豬
你俾條source 出來想玩false equivalence 柒撚到咁仲想笑人執到寶
The Daily Telegraph has stopped publishing paid-for propaganda on behalf of Chinese state media, amid growing scrutiny of how Beijing is using the pandemic to grow its influence in English-language media aimed at western audiences.
The long-running China Watch section, funded by the government-controlled China Daily news outlet, has appeared in the Telegraph for more than a decade. The content, written by Chinese state journalists, presents relentlessly upbeat views on China’s standing in the world in both print supplements and on a branded section of the Telegraph’s website.
加料?
你條低能系真係又唔識英文又唔知乜柒係false equivalence
攞legislator and a member of the Executive Council in Hong Kong寫嘅一篇opinion 來比人地為state media journalist 開嘅成個section
Straw man
我就係笑緊你條傻系係到攞China Watch section 來同人地opinion section 比較呀柒頭
同你講緊Propaganda 係咪staterun 呀?
垃圾, 問你第二次啦
依家同你講緊佢嘅opinion 係岩定錯呀？你訓撚醒未？依家就係講緊呢個係opinion section 人人都可以寫份opinion 登上去呀
你條柒頭係咪唔撚知乜柒係opinion 呀？
答我啦柒頭
And only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
呢一個人係咪俾人用呢條罪起訴呀？
佢同你討論緊邊個撞邊個呀？
佢同你講緊有人俾人用呢一條罪來起訴呀傻系
你真係以為你講乜柒就係乜柒
事實上係2 樣都有份
你想駁d 咩呀低能仔
認撚埋唔岩聽就當係propaganda
你柒唔柒d 呀
咁快技窮呀
駁唔撚到就講個閪
對題啦柒頭
定義完乜野係opinion 中撚哂就想轉移視線
盲撚睇多次啦
a specific perspective on a topic or issue - checked
the message includes verifiable facts and evidence - 係葉劉嘅角度 - That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning - checked
other perspectives and positions may be presented for balance and contrast - 出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那喇盲撚
1. 擺條link 出來同我定義咩係propaganda 題都未撚對到仲以為自己好撚醒
2. 自己quote 撚埋出來“Propaganda” has a wide variety of definitions 你仲同我講寫撚到明
答我啦:
And only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
呢一個人係咪俾人用呢條罪起訴呀？
佢同你討論緊邊個撞邊個呀？
佢同你講緊有人俾人用呢一條罪來起訴呀傻系
你真係以為你講乜柒就係乜柒
事實上係2 樣都有份
你想駁d 咩呀低能仔
Twist你老母就有份
俾人用呢條罪起訴係唔係事實呀?
你話Manipulates facts 呀柒頭
你連佢講緊邊個fact 都未撚識分呀低能仔
你條傻系就真係係到twist係到討論緊邊個撞邊個喇
柒到最尾都重要同攞篇Opinion出來瀨話係Propaganda
重有送你一句
就係笑緊你呀傻系
你條傻仔以為我用 Daily Telegraph 退過晒所有中國宣傳廣告就執到寶
你俾條source 出來想玩false equivalence 柒撚到咁仲想笑人執到寶
The Daily Telegraph has stopped publishing paid-for propaganda on behalf of Chinese state media, amid growing scrutiny of how Beijing is using the pandemic to grow its influence in English-language media aimed at western audiences.
The long-running China Watch section, funded by the government-controlled China Daily news outlet, has appeared in the Telegraph for more than a decade. The content, written by Chinese state journalists, presents relentlessly upbeat views on China’s standing in the world in both print supplements and on a branded section of the Telegraph’s website.
加料?
你條低能系真係又唔識英文又唔知乜柒係false equivalence
攞legislator and a member of the Executive Council in Hong Kong寫嘅一篇opinion 來比人地為state media journalist 開嘅成個section
可惜 Propaganda 唔一定要係 State Run 架懵撚
Straw man
我就係笑緊你條傻系係到攞China Watch section 來同人地opinion section 比較呀柒頭
同你講緊Propaganda 係咪staterun 呀?
垃圾, 問你第二次啦
依家同你講緊佢嘅opinion 係岩定錯呀？你訓撚醒未？依家就係講緊呢個係opinion section 人人都可以寫份opinion 登上去呀
你條柒頭係咪唔撚知乜柒係opinion 呀？
答我啦柒頭
And only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
呢一個人係咪俾人用呢條罪起訴呀？
佢同你討論緊邊個撞邊個呀？
佢同你講緊有人俾人用呢一條罪來起訴呀傻系
係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你真係以為你講乜柒就係乜柒
事實上係2 樣都有份
你想駁d 咩呀低能仔
葉劉個閪係你頭頂啦, 快 d 瀨乾淨去啦. HAHAHA.
認撚埋唔岩聽就當係propaganda你柒唔柒d 呀
咁快技窮呀
駁唔撚到就講個閪
中共最撚毒就係十樣野八樣正常但係一兩樣係毒
對題啦柒頭
定義完乜野係opinion 中撚哂就想轉移視線
盲撚睇多次啦
a specific perspective on a topic or issue - checked
the message includes verifiable facts and evidence - 係葉劉嘅角度 - That evidence may be open to some interpretation, but it is still clear and supported by reasoning - checked
other perspectives and positions may be presented for balance and contrast - 出撚埋link 講香港點樣俾外國批評支那喇盲撚
你咁撚鐘意 BBC 你 quote 乜撚野 Wiki 呀? BBC寫撚到明呀:
1. 擺條link 出來同我定義咩係propaganda 題都未撚對到仲以為自己好撚醒
2. 自己quote 撚埋出來“Propaganda” has a wide variety of definitions 你仲同我講寫撚到明
答我啦:
And only one person has been charged — for secession and terrorism: a 23-year-old man accused of driving a motorbike into police officers and displaying a banner that read “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of Our Times.”
呢一個人係咪俾人用呢條罪起訴呀？
佢同你討論緊邊個撞邊個呀？
佢同你講緊有人俾人用呢一條罪來起訴呀傻系
係限聚令搞到啲人出唔到嚟定係國安法令到人唔出嚟?
你真係以為你講乜柒就係乜柒
事實上係2 樣都有份
你想駁d 咩呀低能仔
Twist你老母就有份
俾人用呢條罪起訴係唔係事實呀?
你話Manipulates facts 呀柒頭
你連佢講緊邊個fact 都未撚識分呀低能仔
你條傻系就真係係到twist係到討論緊邊個撞邊個喇
柒到最尾都重要同攞篇Opinion出來瀨話係Propaganda
重有送你一句
就係笑緊你呀傻系
State-Run Media 係咪中國建制一部份呀.
Executive Council in Hong Kong 係咪香港建制一部份呀.
兒登仔真係唔知乜柒叫state run 係到玩slipper slope fallacy想賴人地寫嘅opinion 係state run
Google "Regina Ip Propaganda" 啦.
原來你真係低鳩能
你唔係咁撚柒睇都唔撚睇以為search result 出嘅野=你想要嘅意思呀?
睇完原來入面所有指責Propaganda 嘅Source 都係來自Twitter
Rick Scott? Rick Scott又點呀
你條低能系唔係咁撚柒以為Twitter 可以當係Source 呀
the hill 只係負責報導呢班人嘅不滿咋
你唔係真係以為執到寶呀
The New York Times groveled over Tom Cotton's oped but happily publishes Chinese Communist propaganda
你真係好撚柒
好心你quote 原source 出來
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-new-york-times-groveled-over-tom-cottons-oped-but-happily-publishes-chinese-communist-propaganda
OPINION
The New York Times groveled over Tom Cotton's op-ed but happily publishes Chinese Communist propaganda
by Becket Adams, Commentary Writer | October 01, 2020 03:52 PM
真係救撚命
你條柒頭真係以為自己好撚醒
New York Times Publishes Pro-Beijing Official’s Op-Ed Praising Crackdown On Hong Kong Protesters
The Ip op-ed had attracted some blowback on Thursday from journalists who saw it as CCP propaganda.
你柒夠未
OH SORRY Remove 咗
你唔洗sorry 架柒頭
睇下人地鬼佬d comment
This doesn't mean NY Times agree with her opinion.NYT’s opinion page also ran Tom Cotton’s fascist manifesto too. It is what it is.Learn what the Opinion section is. They allowed Adrian Zenz to run his propaganda in there too a few weeks ago.btw r/china 唔係r/sino
係反共sub 來架
哎屌,你柒夠未
俾少少challenge 我好冇
低能系
升旗易呢？？
Fox News （只限報導）勉強可以睇，但評論可以不理