Cliff yeung mock 5** 係咪都幾穩陣?
可以咁講
我身邊既fd/呢幾年既學生
正常情況下出黎都最少高過cliff手上1個grade
Mean係高2個grade
你穩陣d
背返足d低能野
考既時候d steps/elaboration 做返足 唔好失大意分應該好穩陣
Same here
但係發覺我其實喺份LQ 都漏得幾多 每條漏1~2分
Cliff yeung mock 5** 係咪都幾穩陣?
可以咁講
我身邊既fd/呢幾年既學生
正常情況下出黎都最少高過cliff手上1個grade
Mean係高2個grade
你穩陣d
背返足d低能野
考既時候d steps/elaboration 做返足 唔好失大意分應該好穩陣
Adas 裏面如果Y(real output)上升
除咗import會下降 貿易逆差減少
Employment 增加 if in deflation gap
對社會仲有啲咩好影響
一般就唔會用好/唔好嘅影響呢啲字眼,因為已經有價值判斷嘅成分,除非題目要你比個normative stance例如評論。
Y升,點解import會係跌?
我唔記得咗import係升定跌 我記得cliff講過import係有影響
係有影響,不過係升而唔係跌。一個地方有米左咁梗係會洗大啲包括入口貨。
呢個concept我自己用常識諗 書好似冇講
巴打不妨做2016 MC Q40 驗證下
Y (output) increase->Income increase->more consumption->M increase->NX(=X-M) decrease
2014 2016 MC都考過 呢d關係
2016 q40係咪d?
唔係
一齊討論下
40. Which of the following situations may lessen fiscal deficit and a trade at the same time?
(1) a reduction in nominal interest rate
(2) a depreciation of the economy’s currency
(3) an increase in income tax
A. (1) and (2) only
B. (1) and (3) only
C. (2) and (3) only
D. (1), (2) and (3)
Q2呢題點搞?
唔係D?
可以照顧下用中文讀嘅同學嗎
問一問書先:
1. Indirect tax係咪一定唔郁AD ?
2. Price有咩functions?
3. Inelastic Demand係咪就係畫直d條demand curve?
4. 點先叫positive statement?
諗到再問,大家加油答左先
Adas 裏面如果Y(real output)上升
除咗import會下降 貿易逆差減少
Employment 增加 if in deflation gap
對社會仲有啲咩好影響
一般就唔會用好/唔好嘅影響呢啲字眼,因為已經有價值判斷嘅成分,除非題目要你比個normative stance例如評論。
Y升,點解import會係跌?
我唔記得咗import係升定跌 我記得cliff講過import係有影響
係有影響,不過係升而唔係跌。一個地方有米左咁梗係會洗大啲包括入口貨。
呢個concept我自己用常識諗 書好似冇講
巴打不妨做2016 MC Q40 驗證下
Y (output) increase->Income increase->more consumption->M increase->NX(=X-M) decrease
2014 2016 MC都考過 呢d關係
2016 q40係咪d?
唔係
一齊討論下
40. Which of the following situations may lessen fiscal deficit and a trade at the same time?
(1) a reduction in nominal interest rate
(2) a depreciation of the economy’s currency
(3) an increase in income tax
A. (1) and (2) only
B. (1) and (3) only
C. (2) and (3) only
D. (1), (2) and (3)
B?
Econ 點溫?自己溫完冇乜效果咁
3-4底 60頭/100
Mc特別差 得2x
永遠唔識清concept,背又唔係
想 上5
lv 5唔係剩係背就得,真係要明marking講緊咩,仲要溫無出過既concept
4上5個位係難,難在無得死背
點溫好?
Econ 點溫?自己溫完冇乜效果咁
3-4底 60頭/100
Mc特別差 得2x
永遠唔識清concept,背又唔係
想 上5
lv 5唔係剩係背就得,真係要明marking講緊咩,仲要溫無出過既concept
4上5個位係難,難在無得死背
點溫好?
你做pp有咩唔明睇notes/書/上黎問
Econ 點溫?自己溫完冇乜效果咁
3-4底 60頭/100
Mc特別差 得2x
永遠唔識清concept,背又唔係
想 上5
lv 5唔係剩係背就得,真係要明marking講緊咩,仲要溫無出過既concept
4上5個位係難,難在無得死背
點溫好?
你做pp有咩唔明睇notes/書/上黎問
我想問一樣野 WIDESPREAD OF OCTOPUS CARD 點樣對MONEY SUPPLY 有影響?
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
點解無IS-LM 既
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
1. Not sure
2. Function of price: allocating (determine what to be produced) and rationing (highest payer get the good)
3. No. for any demand curve, upper region is elastic region, mid-point is Ed=1, lower region is inelastic region
4. Positive statement is a statement that could be proved or disproved by fact
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
1. Not sure
2. Function of price: allocating (determine what to be produced) and rationing (highest payer get the good)
3. No. for any demand curve, upper region is elastic region, mid-point is Ed=1, lower region is inelastic region
4. Positive statement is a statement that could be proved or disproved by fact
1 should be yes(?) indirect tax on a certain good causes its supply curve shift left, and P increase Q decrease. If demand is elastic, %decrease in Q is greater than % increase in P. Then its expenditure drops. Therefore consumption expenditure drops. Assuming that general price level doesn't change after imposing the indirect tax, AD drops.
Not sure
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
1. Not sure
2. Function of price: allocating (determine what to be produced) and rationing (highest payer get the good)
3. No. for any demand curve, upper region is elastic region, mid-point is Ed=1, lower region is inelastic region
4. Positive statement is a statement that could be proved or disproved by fact
1 should be yes(?) indirect tax on a certain good causes its supply curve shift left, and P increase Q decrease. If demand is elastic, %decrease in Q is greater than % increase in P. Then its expenditure drops. Therefore consumption expenditure drops. Assuming that general price level doesn't change after imposing the indirect tax, AD drops.
Not sure
??????
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
1. Not sure
2. Function of price: allocating (determine what to be produced) and rationing (highest payer get the good)
3. No. for any demand curve, upper region is elastic region, mid-point is Ed=1, lower region is inelastic region
4. Positive statement is a statement that could be proved or disproved by fact
1 should be yes(?) indirect tax on a certain good causes its supply curve shift left, and P increase Q decrease. If demand is elastic, %decrease in Q is greater than % increase in P. Then its expenditure drops. Therefore consumption expenditure drops. Assuming that general price level doesn't change after imposing the indirect tax, AD drops.
Not sure
??????
你可唔可以解釋下點解咁諗?
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
1. Not sure
2. Function of price: allocating (determine what to be produced) and rationing (highest payer get the good)
3. No. for any demand curve, upper region is elastic region, mid-point is Ed=1, lower region is inelastic region
4. Positive statement is a statement that could be proved or disproved by fact
1 should be yes(?) indirect tax on a certain good causes its supply curve shift left, and P increase Q decrease. If demand is elastic, %decrease in Q is greater than % increase in P. Then its expenditure drops. Therefore consumption expenditure drops. Assuming that general price level doesn't change after imposing the indirect tax, AD drops.
Not sure
??????
你可唔可以解釋下點解咁諗?
洗乜咁煩 indirect tax eg.sales tax increase the cost of buying good Thus decrease in disposable income and decrease ad
咁樣諗得唔得
問書:
1. Indirect tax(間接稅)係咪一定唔郁AD(總需求) ?
2. Price(價格)有咩functions(功能)?
3. Inelastic Demand(低彈性需求)係咪就係畫直d條demand curve(需求
曲線)?
4. 點先叫positive statement(實證性陳述)?
1) side effect會有機會郁
2)allocated
仲有一個rot字頭英文字母跟住唔記得咗係咩
3)可以咁講 或者一條demand curve mid pt 嘅下面
4)可以用事實或者調查證明係啱
1. Not sure
2. Function of price: allocating (determine what to be produced) and rationing (highest payer get the good)
3. No. for any demand curve, upper region is elastic region, mid-point is Ed=1, lower region is inelastic region
4. Positive statement is a statement that could be proved or disproved by fact
1 should be yes(?) indirect tax on a certain good causes its supply curve shift left, and P increase Q decrease. If demand is elastic, %decrease in Q is greater than % increase in P. Then its expenditure drops. Therefore consumption expenditure drops. Assuming that general price level doesn't change after imposing the indirect tax, AD drops.
Not sure
??????
你可唔可以解釋下點解咁諗?