Pastpaper mc
有題問acc to classical QTM
when money supply is growing at a constant % each per.
Which diagram is correct
點解not PL increase constantly（horizontally
而係inflation rate increase constantly
點解我可以咁撚廢課money creation卡左我成日
未學你地講果啲QTM 乜乜柒柒
GDP GNP仲記得少少 但fiscal policy 果啲全部唔記得晒未開始溫
得番13日 而家先溫到依度 是咪攞3無望？
對住money creation做到想喊又時不時唔明搞乜
13日可以做到好多嘢 你而家放棄就注定失敗 點解唔搏埋佢
Pastpaper mc
有題問acc to classical QTM
when money supply is growing at a constant % each per.
Which diagram is correct
點解not PL increase constantly（horizontally
而係inflation rate increase constantly
money supply is growing at a constant %
PL同inflation rate
M1/m0果啲MV = PY ,
改變率版公式：
△%M +△% V ≈ △%P + △% Y
因為classical( 古典 ) ,即係長期咁，VY不變
條公式就會係
△%M ≈ △%P
另外， △%P亦為通脹率(inflation rate)
有錯請指教。。小弟都想學野
睇清楚題目先
題目話m is growing at a constant percentage
呢個percentage唔係%△M
佢嘅意思係，M in this year=Initial M * (1+r)^t
t is no. of years passed
r 就係佢所講嘅percentage
咁%△M係咩？
畫一幅graph，y axis 係M，x axis係t，呢幅graph嘅slope就係%△M。
比幅graph你睇
見唔見到幅graph係越嚟越斜，即係slope一直上升，即係%△M一直上升，根據mv=py，%△P上升，即係inflation rate 上升
至於要解釋點解%△p係上升 constantly, 就牽涉到難少少嘅數學(微積分)，呢條題目其實對數底差嘅同學唔着數。
Dse會唔會咁痴線，定用返傻仔大法△%M +△% V ≈ △%P + △% Y諗都頂得住 聽巴打講開左新post
https://lihkg.com/thread/202820/page/1
過去啦大家
點解我可以咁撚廢
未學你地講果啲QTM 乜乜柒柒
GDP GNP仲記得少少 但fiscal policy 果啲全部唔記得晒未開始溫
得番13日 而家先溫到依度 是咪攞3無望？
對住money creation做到想喊又時不時唔明搞乜
13日可以做到好多嘢 你而家放棄就注定失敗 點解唔搏埋佢
巴打，我介紹你睇個youtuber,,,叫karl yung
我成個econ自修計劃都係因為佢先有今日
econ版herman yeung
How about Q5a
More people buy electric cars-> competitive demand-> d of diesel cars decreases-> q and p both decrease
substiute既解釋係一邊P跌demand for substiute跌
electric cars P升係因為demand升左
所以要係supply個邊諗
How about Q5a
More people buy electric cars-> competitive demand-> d of diesel cars decreases-> q and p both decrease
substiute既解釋係一邊P跌demand for substiute跌
electric cars P升係因為demand升左
所以要係supply個邊諗
可唔可以話電動車需求升左價格升左, 所以導致替代品柴油車需求都升左?
How about Q5a
More people buy electric cars-> competitive demand-> d of diesel cars decreases-> q and p both decrease
substiute既解釋係一邊P跌demand for substiute跌
electric cars P升係因為demand升左
所以要係supply個邊諗
可唔可以話電動車需求升左價格升左, 所以導致替代品柴油車需求都升左?
其實呢條2015都有啦
點解你會將所有野都諗到極複雜
我都想問下
我現實識個人每次都搬到extreme case出黎講,cls
樓主打錯字多但份卷正常架喎
