堅稱黑人智商先天比白人低 諾貝爾獎得主被剝奪頭銜

黑人先天智商低有冇研究support?
if yes, link pls, 唔好9up

如果黑人SAT可以加分
ASIAN屌閪可唔可以加長幾公分

但係中國文革果陣都環境好惡劣依家iq排名頭幾位

基於基因不同，黑人男性性器官比白人粗大，發表此理論會不會受到懲罰？

歐洲黑死病死咁多人 都可以文藝復興 工業革命又點計
黑人廢就廢

不了 廢事浪費口水
in case 有人見到呢個comment
我會留底一啲同廣義race and genetics相關嘅資料
基本上全部免費，你可以驗證
如果有讀biomedic嘅巴打請指教

不過留名等睇連登仔話全部學術機構都畀左膠入侵
連登仔勁過所有專業訓練嘅geneticist, psychologist
----------------------------------------------------------

呢兩段片主要係講究竟有無genetic證據支持傳統嘅種族劃分
tl;dw-->答案係無
The Science of Human Races, Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teyvcs2S4mI

The Science of Human Race, Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVmj8dDx9yY
----------------------------------------------------------
美國人類基因學會 （The American Society of Human Ge-
netics）就係見到班白人至上主義者攞genetics打飛機
所以特等出咗篇立場書反駁
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000292971830363X
// Genetics demonstrates that humans cannot be divided into biologically distinct subcategories.//
// Most human genetic variation is distributed as a gradient, so distinct boundaries between population groups cannot be accurately assigned.//
// It follows that there can be no genetics-based support for claiming
one group as superior to another.//

而且有基本知識嘅人就知道
非洲人嘅基因多樣性（對比歐洲人、亞洲人）係最大
https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1435
// Second, the African populations are more diverse, a pattern consistent with many studies that have compared π in various human populations.//


將非洲人按膚色編埋一齊叫「黑人」
根本on9

---------------------------------------------------------------------
以上係反駁「種族」呢個概念響基因學嘅疑似基礎

至於「白人」「黑人」嘅智商差異
可以參考美國心理學協會(APA)響2012年出嘅評論
“Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments.”
http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-30298-001
呢篇文非常值得睇
連登仔成日loop嘅point，咩「男女先天能力差異好大會影響學習進度」啊、「亞洲/猶太人天生好聰明」之類
都有address到
// This is an adoption study by Moore (1986). She examined the IQs of Black and mixed- race children averaging 81⁄2 years of age who were adopted by middle-class families who were either Black or White. The children who were of half-European origin had virtually the same average IQ as the children who were of exclusively Black origin. Hence European genes were of no advantage to this group of “Blacks.” Children (both Black and mixed-race) adopted by White families had IQs 13 points higher on average than those adopted by Black families, indicating that there were marked differences in the environments of Black and White families relevant to socialization for IQ;//
[...]
// Thus, the weight of the evidence suggests that stereotype threat probably accounts for some of the Black–White difference on intelligence-related tests under some circumstances. At the least, these
effects should give one considerable pause when interpreting group differences in intelligence test scores and academic achievement potential.//
------------------------------------------------------
所以 一句總結：
James Watson好勁，發現DNA；佢係相干嘅權威，無錯...
So what?
佢發表意見時有無cite peer-review source啊？
係咪連批判思考都唔知？

如果萊特兄弟話黃種人唔適合搭飛機
咁你係咪真係唔搭啊？

見#206
答案係無 （證據不足支持 基因 係黑白人智商差異嘅原因）

力架馬個濕鳩和平奬同智商撚有關係

「基因論」見#206

// 但用人類發展角度
黑人文明社會發展得最差係事實//
對於西方文明至上論
反駁見
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/4tln3x/steve_king_the_contributions_of_western_civ/d5ibayl/
特別留意part II

咁黑人白人有智商差異有support未?

"種族間有無差別" 呢個問題其實好白痴。

只要Sample size 夠大，其本上任何difference 也是statistically significant. (see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444174/)

用一個種族同另一個種族比較，基本上無可能無差別。

比較重要的問題其實係種族差別的影響力 (i.e., effect size) 究竟有幾大。? 比如說 +/- 3 的IQ 差別，對個人成長發展有幾重要?

宋代漢人係響宋代俾蒙古人殺曬, 跟住大飢荒文革連有良知既都殺埋造就今日世界二大公敵之一既支那

咪俾我睇死西方左膠隨時學埋支那咁玩文革

有證據收窄咗

同埋重點係「基因」
答案係無

中国平均IQ係東亞入面算低喎

有證據收窄即係點
而家白人普遍IQ高過黑人係咪有SUPPORT?
先唔論差異既原因

經濟學係嚴謹科學

記得同佢見過面交流過既大學講師話華生份人不嬲直腸直肚有果句講果句
呢D先係真正既科學家

iq test 無代表性

🦍

咁多年有哂研究證明 係現實生活見到既結果又係一樣

講事實都唔得 仲講咩學術?

智商(iq)既定義咪就係iq test既result囉
智商同智力係兩個概念