2017留名
補緊cs同billy
望3-4
補兩個人
唔覺好浪費時間咩
上少d連登，陪少d女，唔交齊學校功課，每日溫到2點左右，再加少少努力應該得。
前兩年無努力既後果⋯⋯溫書先
Btw 我係理科人，將文科當做理科讀。所以都幾易上手
[2017DSE] 英文科討論區
紙人
134 回覆
9 Like
2 Dislike
Btw 我係理科人，將文科當做理科讀。所以都幾易上手
2017留名
補緊cs同billy
望3-4
補兩個人
唔覺好浪費時間咩
上少d連登，陪少d女，唔交齊學校功課，每日溫到2點左右，再加少少努力應該得。
前兩年無努力既後果⋯⋯溫書先
Btw 我係理科人，將文科當做理科讀。所以都幾易上手
我冇女 學校功課都係揀黎交
但12點一定要訓
身體頂唔順幫推
支持
支持
08/01/2017 [Paper 1]
話說近排改緊免費mock既paper 1
見到大家答題有好多問題出現
所以今日我地講下Paper 1
Paper 1 Reading 佔分20%
你有一個半鐘去做
大部分同學最大既困難唔係唔識
而係做唔哂
所以佢係一份對英文底好既同學非常有利既卷
建議大家要好好take time
Aim Level 3 / 坐3望4既同學：
Part A (50mins) + Part B1 (35mins) + 執漏 (5 mins)
Aim Level 4而覺得B2太難既同學：
Part A (40 mins) + Part B1 (45 mins) + 執漏 (5 mins)
Aim Level 4 又做開B2既同學：
Part A (40 mins) + Part B2 (45 mins) + 執漏 (10 mins)
Aim Level 5 or above既同學：
Part A (30 mins) + Part B2 (50 mins) + 執漏 (10 mins)
之後我地一齊黎睇下有關paper 1既十個須知啦
出住5個先
Ten Must-know Facts (上)
1. 答案必定建基於Reading Passage(s)
建基於Reading Passages有兩個意思
一：照抄
二：文本推論
即係話答題目既時候
基本上你唔需要運用到個人知識
因為依份卷叫reading
你只需要基於文章既內容答題
或者contextual clues推論答案
2. 題目順住Reading Passage(s)去
除左幾段一題既題目之外
所有既題目都係順住篇章既順序出現
所以衍生左可以因而估答案既"skill"
3. 答案基本上唔會重覆
考評局接受既答案可以多於一個
但往往每一題既答案都唔會重覆
即係話你答左既答案唔應該再係第二題出現
4. 唔駛答Complete Sentences
冇題目需要你答完整句子
除非佢寫明
換言之抄key words就得
唔好再哂時間抄題目啦
5. 三個分題既T/F/NG未必一定齊哂T/F/NG
通常DSE出true false not given都有三個分題
唔知係咪有補習天王咁教啦
成日都見學生答一個true一個false一個not given
其實唔一定係咁既pattern 架
就好似2013年咁
好喇聽日再見
話說近排改緊免費mock既paper 1
見到大家答題有好多問題出現
所以今日我地講下Paper 1
Paper 1 Reading 佔分20%
你有一個半鐘去做
大部分同學最大既困難唔係唔識
而係做唔哂
所以佢係一份對英文底好既同學非常有利既卷
建議大家要好好take time
Aim Level 3 / 坐3望4既同學：
Part A (50mins) + Part B1 (35mins) + 執漏 (5 mins)
Aim Level 4而覺得B2太難既同學：
Part A (40 mins) + Part B1 (45 mins) + 執漏 (5 mins)
Aim Level 4 又做開B2既同學：
Part A (40 mins) + Part B2 (45 mins) + 執漏 (10 mins)
Aim Level 5 or above既同學：
Part A (30 mins) + Part B2 (50 mins) + 執漏 (10 mins)
之後我地一齊黎睇下有關paper 1既十個須知啦
出住5個先
Ten Must-know Facts (上)
1. 答案必定建基於Reading Passage(s)
建基於Reading Passages有兩個意思
一：照抄
二：文本推論
即係話答題目既時候
基本上你唔需要運用到個人知識
因為依份卷叫reading
你只需要基於文章既內容答題
或者contextual clues推論答案
2. 題目順住Reading Passage(s)去
除左幾段一題既題目之外
所有既題目都係順住篇章既順序出現
所以衍生左可以因而估答案既"skill"
3. 答案基本上唔會重覆
考評局接受既答案可以多於一個
但往往每一題既答案都唔會重覆
即係話你答左既答案唔應該再係第二題出現
4. 唔駛答Complete Sentences
冇題目需要你答完整句子
除非佢寫明
換言之抄key words就得
唔好再哂時間抄題目啦
5. 三個分題既T/F/NG未必一定齊哂T/F/NG
通常DSE出true false not given都有三個分題
唔知係咪有補習天王咁教啦
成日都見學生答一個true一個false一個not given
其實唔一定係咁既pattern 架
就好似2013年咁
好喇聽日再見
打錯左
Aim Level 4 又做開B2既同學：
Part A (35 mins) + Part B2 (50 mins) + 執漏 (5 mins)
Aim Level 4 又做開B2既同學：
Part A (35 mins) + Part B2 (50 mins) + 執漏 (5 mins)
Live
Retaker留名學野
劉明
有咩方法可以短時間提升reading+listening 能力?
利申: 兩科都唔知有無2
利申: 兩科都唔知有無2
有咩方法可以短時間提升reading+listening 能力?
利申: 兩科都唔知有無2
做多d 聽多d
Reading你起碼要知道嗰十個principles
學問題字眼
Listening就去ted talk / BBC / Pearl
每日聽半個鐘
冇捷徑
Listening Part A 一定要操AL
12年開始 EAA好鍾意出AL D question types
12年開始 EAA好鍾意出AL D question types
Listening Part A 一定要操AL
12年開始 EAA好鍾意出AL D question types
其實勤力又想攞5或以上既同學都好應該操哂CE AL DSE
如果做b1攞4 ABpart分別要幾多%？
有咩方法可以短時間提升reading+listening 能力?
利申: 兩科都唔知有無2
做多d 聽多d
Reading你起碼要知道嗰十個principles
學問題字眼
Listening就去ted talk / BBC / Pearl
每日聽半個鐘
冇捷徑
bbc 6mins有冇用?
如果做b1攞4 ABpart分別要幾多%？
去小卒睇 每年唔同
有咩方法可以短時間提升reading+listening 能力?
利申: 兩科都唔知有無2
做多d 聽多d
Reading你起碼要知道嗰十個principles
學問題字眼
Listening就去ted talk / BBC / Pearl
每日聽半個鐘
冇捷徑
bbc 6mins有冇用?
實有架
起碼你聽英文靈敏啲
Official overestimates of Hong Kong’s future population are deliberate and will prove costly
The 8.22 million population by 2043 is only one scenario in the government’s official projections; the high growth scenario projects a population of 9.01 million by 2046 and 9.11 million by 2064. “Hong Kong 2030 plus” must be robust enough to cater for uncertainties and changes.
Raymond Lee, Director of planning
Letters to the Editor , December 29
Let’s accept immediately that making multi-year population forecasts is mostly guesswork. It pretends to hard statistical analysis but its flaw lies in assumptions that are just crystal ball gazing.
1. forecast n. 預測 (also v.)
2. flaw n. countable 缺陷
3. assumption n. 假設
4. crystal ball v. 水晶球
5. gaze v. 注視
If our statisticians mostly get it wrong, however, you would think they would as often get it wrong by making forecasts that are too low as too high.
Not so. The record shows that they always guess too high, sometimes astoundingly so. The first chart tells you the story. The latest guess is the lower red line. It says our population will peak at 8.2 million in 2043 and then actually go down.
6. astoundingly adv. 令人震驚地
7. peak v. 達到頂點 (also adj. /n.)
Above that red line you get some earlier official forecasts. It’s always the same. Time and time again, the numbers must be revised down.
8. revise v. 修訂
My favourite is on the left of the chart, a guess made in an update from a 1999 transport planning study, CTS3. It said that last year we would have a population of 8.9 million people. The actual figure was 7.3 million. And this was labelled as the moderate guess. The high growth scenario said 10.1 million.
9. figure n. 數字
10. moderate adj. 溫和的 (also v. / n.)
11. scenario n. 情節/事態
It is my contention that these consistent overestimates are no accident. Our government is plagued by a concrete-pouring mania, and the bedrock of infrastructure planning is population forecasting. Get the numbers up and you can justify more rail, road, bridge and tunnel projects.
12. contention n. 主張
13 consistent adj. 一致的
14. plague v. 煩擾 (also n. 瘟疫)
15. bedrock 根基
And, yes, I do accuse our Census and Statistics Department of giving in too easily to the engineers and the contractors who have ensconced themselves in power through functional constituencies. You see the evidence.
16. accuse sb. of sth. v. 指控
17. ensconce v. 安置
The 8.22 million population by 2043 is only one scenario in the government’s official projections; the high growth scenario projects a population of 9.01 million by 2046 and 9.11 million by 2064. “Hong Kong 2030 plus” must be robust enough to cater for uncertainties and changes.
Raymond Lee, Director of planning
Letters to the Editor , December 29
Let’s accept immediately that making multi-year population forecasts is mostly guesswork. It pretends to hard statistical analysis but its flaw lies in assumptions that are just crystal ball gazing.
1. forecast n. 預測 (also v.)
2. flaw n. countable 缺陷
3. assumption n. 假設
4. crystal ball v. 水晶球
5. gaze v. 注視
If our statisticians mostly get it wrong, however, you would think they would as often get it wrong by making forecasts that are too low as too high.
Not so. The record shows that they always guess too high, sometimes astoundingly so. The first chart tells you the story. The latest guess is the lower red line. It says our population will peak at 8.2 million in 2043 and then actually go down.
6. astoundingly adv. 令人震驚地
7. peak v. 達到頂點 (also adj. /n.)
Above that red line you get some earlier official forecasts. It’s always the same. Time and time again, the numbers must be revised down.
8. revise v. 修訂
My favourite is on the left of the chart, a guess made in an update from a 1999 transport planning study, CTS3. It said that last year we would have a population of 8.9 million people. The actual figure was 7.3 million. And this was labelled as the moderate guess. The high growth scenario said 10.1 million.
9. figure n. 數字
10. moderate adj. 溫和的 (also v. / n.)
11. scenario n. 情節/事態
It is my contention that these consistent overestimates are no accident. Our government is plagued by a concrete-pouring mania, and the bedrock of infrastructure planning is population forecasting. Get the numbers up and you can justify more rail, road, bridge and tunnel projects.
12. contention n. 主張
13 consistent adj. 一致的
14. plague v. 煩擾 (also n. 瘟疫)
15. bedrock 根基
And, yes, I do accuse our Census and Statistics Department of giving in too easily to the engineers and the contractors who have ensconced themselves in power through functional constituencies. You see the evidence.
16. accuse sb. of sth. v. 指控
17. ensconce v. 安置
But the planning department should not make the assumption that they must plan for the high growth scenario so that there is no shortfall of housing and infrastructure.
18. shortfall n. 差額
Too high is easily as bad as too low in these matters. Too high means condemning another generation to shoebox flats on the assumption of continued crowding when lower growth would allow more spacious flats.
19. condemn v. 譴責
20. spacious adj. 具空間的
Similarly it means the unnecessary sacrifice of green land to what will prove to be underused transport projects, and the sacrifice of fiscal savings that could be put to more useful social purposes.
21. sacrifice n. 犧牲 (also v.)
22. fiscal adj. 國家財政的
Robust is wrong, sir. What we need is Goldilocks planning - not too high, not too low, but just right.
The odd thing is that our government actually has more control of population numbers than most jurisdictions do. As the second chart shows, all indications are that within ten years natural increase (births over deaths) will go strongly negative.
23 jurisdiction n. 司法
24. indication n. 標示
Population growth will then only be sustained by “net movements”, which basically means immigration from the mainland, now running at about 45,000 people a year.
25. sustain v. 維持
Pass the word to Beijing that this must be restrained and we can start planning for bigger flats tomorrow. But would Hong Kong’s planners sign on or are they sold to the contractors?
26. restrain v. 抑制
18. shortfall n. 差額
Too high is easily as bad as too low in these matters. Too high means condemning another generation to shoebox flats on the assumption of continued crowding when lower growth would allow more spacious flats.
19. condemn v. 譴責
20. spacious adj. 具空間的
Similarly it means the unnecessary sacrifice of green land to what will prove to be underused transport projects, and the sacrifice of fiscal savings that could be put to more useful social purposes.
21. sacrifice n. 犧牲 (also v.)
22. fiscal adj. 國家財政的
Robust is wrong, sir. What we need is Goldilocks planning - not too high, not too low, but just right.
The odd thing is that our government actually has more control of population numbers than most jurisdictions do. As the second chart shows, all indications are that within ten years natural increase (births over deaths) will go strongly negative.
23 jurisdiction n. 司法
24. indication n. 標示
Population growth will then only be sustained by “net movements”, which basically means immigration from the mainland, now running at about 45,000 people a year.
25. sustain v. 維持
Pass the word to Beijing that this must be restrained and we can start planning for bigger flats tomorrow. But would Hong Kong’s planners sign on or are they sold to the contractors?
26. restrain v. 抑制