冇冇冇，讀到jacobian matrix就停咗
會唔會好重要
量子力學x輪迥x外星人 v0.0.1
不過講開又講
1001 回覆
8 Like
85 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
Ah shit
係咪好高騖遠，yr 1/2未搞掂就直跳
我嘅mind flow係linear algebra，中學學過喇，無癮；咦，group同ring喎，完全無聽過，好似好好玩，exercise，又悶又唔識邊個做
原來linear algebra有咁多嘢我唔識
Sorry 我份人興趣流 直覺流
所以會時常搞啲笑話出嚟David Deutsch, Peter Shor and Peter Zoller
神人
Ignacio Cirac, David Deutsch, Peter Shor and Peter Zoller
神人
All irreducible are prime in UFD
Let ab = kp
In the case of k is not 0, in the case of k is 0 is obvious as UFD are ID
Factorise k
Since ab is referring to same element as kp, they must have same(unique) factorisation as well(by definition of UFD), therefore p must exist in ab and the problem left is position of p, so it is either one of them is multiple of p, it satisfies the definition of prime ideal
Let ab = kp
In the case of k is not 0, in the case of k is 0 is obvious as UFD are ID
Factorise k
Since ab is referring to same element as kp, they must have same(unique) factorisation as well(by definition of UFD), therefore p must exist in ab and the problem left is position of p, so it is either one of them is multiple of p, it satisfies the definition of prime ideal
色即是空
色完咪兩袋清空
色完咪兩袋清空
Will read tmr probably
秋、冬番來了
守護甜心有續集
If we take in our hand any volume; of mathematic or physical science, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any Buddhism, Taoism and Oriental mythology? No. Does it contain story of alien, new age and Scientology? No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion
夕凪巴 我估可能唔洗睇咒術
好似話新一集都係糞到人人喊打
好似話新一集都係糞到人人喊打
應該後兩日先有