So your argument for creationism is the watchmaker analogy, and the conclusion would be intelligence design. Finally , something concrete that we can talk about
The watchmaker analogy is as follow (copied from Wiki

):
"deists suggested the watchmaker analogy: just as watches are set in motion by watchmakers, after which they operate according to their pre-established mechanisms, so also was the world begun by God as creator, after which it and all its parts have operated according to their pre-established natural laws. With these laws perfectly in place, events have unfolded according to the prescribed plan."
the argument can be summarised as follow:
P1:A watch is set to operate according to their pre-established mechanisms
P2: Similarly, the universe operates according to the perfectly in placed, pre-established natural laws.
P3: A watch won't operate without a watchmaker who design the pre-established mechanisms.
P4: Similarly, the universe would not operate as the way it does without an intelligent being which is capable of designing the pre-established natural laws.
C: There must be an intelligent being that set the world in motion, designing natural laws and so. (Depending on your religion) Such god must be the biblical god.
Such argument is quite ... limited. Simply from Wiki:
Hume offers is about the form of the argument as an analogy in itself. An analogical argument claims that because object X (a watch) is like object Y (the universe) in one respect, both are therefore probably alike in another, hidden, respect (their cause, having to be created by an intelligent designer). He points out that for an argument from analogy to be successful, the two things that are being compared have to have an adequate number of similarities that are relevant to the respect that are analogised. ......
Hume then argues that the universe and a watch also do not have enough relevant or close similarities to infer that they were both created the same way. For example, the universe is made of organic natural material, but the watch is made of artificial mechanic materials. He claims that in the same respect, the universe could be argued to be more analogous to something more organic such as a vegetable (which we can observe for ourselves does not need a 'designer' or a 'watchmaker' to be created). Although he admits the analogy of a universe to a vegetable to seem ridiculous, he says that it is just as ridiculous to analogize the universe with a watch.
Tldr: Using a watch as the analogy of the universe is an unfair analogy. The universe is too different from the watch for such analogy to be useful. The watch is made from artificial material while the world is made from naturally occurring material. Thus, such analogy is limited.
Even if we take the fairness of the analogy as granted, the argument does not necessitate any specific deity who is responsible for the design. Again, why the biblical god? Why not Allah, or some other random deities?
At this point, I am not expecting any solid reading, not a component reply. you would simply disregard my argument cus you can't read, and claim that this is chat GPT. Pathetic display, really.
