四大會計師行做IT vs SI做IT

其實係
條友吹奏accenture簡直on99 推人去死

呢類公司應該唔算係外國cs撚眼中嘅tech company
真正嘅tech company應該係以develop自己product為主（FAANG,MSFT etc.甚至玩埋research），而唔係接出面客嘅project砌solution為主

但係香港tech scene可能冇乜real tech company，所以
後者就係香港人對IT公司嘅認知，咁Accenture會被吹奏係好正常嘅事

前者

router

你係咪傻仔黎有邊個唔知google >>>> all?
咁係香港都冇 真係睇得上眼既其實係得HF/ibank FO tech, MaYBe~accenture but not really tbh, 再其他就一律都係垃圾

真 只不過係無咁垃圾咁解

國泰project 睇你background派你去邊、無乜say 除非你做左好耐同埋無左你唔得掛

好勁 一聽就覺得你係MBB

咁真心有乜好
人工又唔係特別高
FI一年跳一份嗰啲人工高過等佢慢慢升成截

Chur 都由佢
問題係佢呢兩年升好少人
Big4 都好過佢

的笑容

上Glassdoor睇
A啲人好似仲係完全唔睇你興趣或者有咩skill set
亂咁掉啲人入唔啱佢地嘅project
聽落好似好伏
In-house 起碼有得深入咁去學一樣自己有興趣既野
唔會無啦啦諗住入嚟做data跟住俾人dum咗去寫web app

FI全寫係咩？

老實講，SI人工較底，人事問題都會有，你要本身有基本既IT Skills先好去。

FO全寫係咩？

financial institution

係唔好架啦不過樓主comparing 緊big4 vs Vendor 呀嘛咪比間最勁既vendor佢

how about Cagemini ?

accenture 邊係vendor
佢唔係整product 出嚟

你傻撚咗？Google香港office唔係玩engineering，到有engineering team先再同我講Google>all啦