Leveraged ETF 討論區 (4)
Outliers
1001 回覆
8 Like
0 Dislike
#4 SVXY係負0.5倍
LETF最獨特嘅地方係daily rebalance，依個特性係孖展、期權、期貨都無（除非你手動做啦，但正常人應該唔會咁做）
Daily rebalance好處係可以享受compounding effect，壞處係有votality decay，而最近十年美股TQQQ, UPRO證明咗compounding effect係大過votality decay。
Daily rebalance好處係可以享受compounding effect，壞處係有votality decay，而最近十年美股TQQQ, UPRO證明咗compounding effect係大過votality decay。
tqqq幾時會拆股
差唔多到200就會拆
支持
TQQQ升得咁急，應唔應該賣？
唔會，靠自己主觀判斷去估短期走勢多數唔準。
唔會，靠自己主觀判斷去估短期走勢多數唔準。
盤前又
我慢慢都將重心轉到Hedgefundie's 戰略
UPRO + TMF 55/40
每季rebalance （連投入資金）
呢個戰略見人會換tqqq 但我都係比較愛upro
雖然獲利會少左，始終愛sp500多元化
UPRO + TMF 55/40
每季rebalance （連投入資金）
呢個戰略見人會換tqqq 但我都係比較愛upro
雖然獲利會少左，始終愛sp500多元化
時供、分供、秒供
開到 4 
有時我會諗QQQ咁貴都唔拆做乜鳩
SPY唔拆因為佢數字上跟貼S&P 500
但係QQQ完全冇呢方面既incentive
SPY唔拆因為佢數字上跟貼S&P 500
但係QQQ完全冇呢方面既incentive
Lmlm
係囉，係都voo拆先
不過voo同qqq有冇拆過？ google過好似冇資料
不過voo同qqq有冇拆過？ google過好似冇資料
Reddit:
(https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/comments/epb4ru/voo_300_time_for_a_split/)
I doubt it. Vanguard seems to prefer cost reduction to the slightly increased accessibility that comes with lower share price
Vanguard actually did a reverse split of VOO back in 2013 to deliberately raise the share price. Their rationale was that for every share of VOO you have to buy {and later sell), you lose a little bit of money from the bid/ask spread. Increasing the cost of shares results in fewer shares needing to be bought or sold for any given amount of money, which they believed would result in savings for their customers.
I don't know what criteria they go by to decide when to split, but they're on the record stating that they prefer VOO to have a higher share price in order to reduce costs to investors.
但係QQQ完全冇人問
(https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/comments/epb4ru/voo_300_time_for_a_split/)
I doubt it. Vanguard seems to prefer cost reduction to the slightly increased accessibility that comes with lower share price
Vanguard actually did a reverse split of VOO back in 2013 to deliberately raise the share price. Their rationale was that for every share of VOO you have to buy {and later sell), you lose a little bit of money from the bid/ask spread. Increasing the cost of shares results in fewer shares needing to be bought or sold for any given amount of money, which they believed would result in savings for their customers.
I don't know what criteria they go by to decide when to split, but they're on the record stating that they prefer VOO to have a higher share price in order to reduce costs to investors.
但係QQQ完全冇人問
唔該哂
VOO拆就好，我最重倉
VOO拆就好，我最重倉
新po lm
本細 等拆股先入會唔會太遲
本細 等拆股先入會唔會太遲