又半個post點解你地咁多野傾
![]()
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
孤獨的文科撚
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁


又半個post點解你地咁多野傾
![]()
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
孤獨的文科撚
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
有無人乜鬼係reader?
UK有啲嗰rank係lecturer,我知大約等如AP
但乜鬼係reader![]()
![]()
又半個post點解你地咁多野傾
![]()
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
痴線,你唔係以為毒撚入shitty會變mk下![]()
毒撚去到世界末日都係毒撚
唔係劇毒個種![]()
應該算係摺姐
感覺係cu 會舒服過hku 掛
不過邊有咁多如果
咁如果你一早知hku cut astron嘅話,會唔會揀cu phy?
應該會![]()
最嬲應該係入左黎先知佢cut
如果唔係一早揀theoretical phys
我係貪佢有得double major,唔係既話都揀cu![]()
結果發現hku既math course structure怪怪地![]()
不過天文course都做得幾好,多選擇過cu
我個科就間間學校教嘅嘢都唔同
比我揀多次都會係hku
我依然都係HKU最尾
Same, major問題 雖然pg有考慮過hku
話星期五出result,但冇收到email
佢威力真係好大![]()
又半個post點解你地咁多野傾
![]()
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
孤獨的文科撚
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
又半個post點解你地咁多野傾
![]()
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
孤獨的文科撚
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
又半個post點解你地咁多野傾
![]()
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
孤獨的文科撚
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
孤獨的文科撚
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
大部分份答唔到嘴![]()
好多數學家經濟學家同電腦高手
孤獨的文科撚
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
文科撚會睇咩書,做咩研究?
廣義上係咩書都睇,因為其實咩都可以有關
我做visual culture, 但文史哲都要睇
最近睇緊Derrida睇到想死
點撚解d法國佬好地地講野唔得,up親都好似念詩咁
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
我個field啲人寫monograph個陣都有時會撻一兩句wittgenstein或者kuhn出嚟好似好勁咁![]()
我有時覺得d人係亂鳩咁黎
屌你老母根本就睇唔明
放句似是疑非嘅野係到,望落勁d
我好懷疑其實有幾多人真係全文睇晒先quote果句
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
冇聽過barthes![]()
現代應該冇乜影響力
講真,而家structuralist應該得返saussure,jakobson,trubetzkoy,jespersen(都唔知jespersen算唔算structuralist)同班bloomfieldians有啲人聽過![]()
現代仲抱住structuralism唔放嘅人,我淨係諗到lazard同p matthews
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
冇聽過barthes![]()
現代應該冇乜影響力
講真,而家structuralist應該得返saussure,jakobson,trubetzkoy,jespersen(都唔知jespersen算唔算structuralist)同班bloomfieldians有啲人聽過![]()
現代仲抱住structuralism唔放嘅人,我淨係諗到lazard同p matthews
其實我覺得冇乜問題,又唔係重點,當係裝飾嘅啫呢啲![]()
Derrida句句都係呢d撚屌野
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
冇聽過barthes![]()
現代應該冇乜影響力
講真,而家structuralist應該得返saussure,jakobson,trubetzkoy,jespersen(都唔知jespersen算唔算structuralist)同班bloomfieldians有啲人聽過![]()
現代仲抱住structuralism唔放嘅人,我淨係諗到lazard同p matthews
Roland Barthes喎
佢d應該已經冇人用,因為依家眼光睇好多缺點
但classic黎喎,做ling, culture都冇可能未聽過
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
冇聽過barthes![]()
現代應該冇乜影響力
講真,而家structuralist應該得返saussure,jakobson,trubetzkoy,jespersen(都唔知jespersen算唔算structuralist)同班bloomfieldians有啲人聽過![]()
現代仲抱住structuralism唔放嘅人,我淨係諗到lazard同p matthews
Roland Barthes喎
佢d應該已經冇人用,因為依家眼光睇好多缺點
但classic黎喎,做ling, culture都冇可能未聽過
通常讀ling都唔多講ling嘅歷史![]()
![]()
戰前班人,通常都係因為contribute咗啲重要嘅concept或者寫咗啲重要嘅grammar先有人記得,好似jakobson啲distinctive features,swadesh嘅swadesh list,meillet嘅grammaticalisation,趙元任嘅grammar of spoken chinese同對phoneme嘅討論等等。
![]()
![]()
其實通常我聽啲人講derrida好多時都係鬧佢或者當恥笑對象
between咁巴打有無睇過bloomfield,hockett,boas,sapir之類?
冇,我唔係主攻ling![]()
我睇Benjamin, Adorno 果邊art, cultural studies野多
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
冇聽過barthes![]()
現代應該冇乜影響力
講真,而家structuralist應該得返saussure,jakobson,trubetzkoy,jespersen(都唔知jespersen算唔算structuralist)同班bloomfieldians有啲人聽過![]()
現代仲抱住structuralism唔放嘅人,我淨係諗到lazard同p matthews
Roland Barthes喎
佢d應該已經冇人用,因為依家眼光睇好多缺點
但classic黎喎,做ling, culture都冇可能未聽過
通常讀ling都唔多講ling嘅歷史![]()
![]()
戰前班人,通常都係因為contribute咗啲重要嘅concept或者寫咗啲重要嘅grammar先有人記得,好似jakobson啲distinctive features,swadesh嘅swadesh list,meillet嘅grammaticalisation,趙元任嘅grammar of spoken chinese同對phoneme嘅討論等等。
Barthes同Derria係cultral呢邊好重要
因為係佢地將ling嘅structuralism同poststructuralism帶入cultural critic
當然依家仲用唔用佢地d野就另一回事
但成日睇書,d人總鍾意quote 佢地d野
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
冇聽過barthes![]()
現代應該冇乜影響力
講真,而家structuralist應該得返saussure,jakobson,trubetzkoy,jespersen(都唔知jespersen算唔算structuralist)同班bloomfieldians有啲人聽過![]()
現代仲抱住structuralism唔放嘅人,我淨係諗到lazard同p matthews
Roland Barthes喎
佢d應該已經冇人用,因為依家眼光睇好多缺點
但classic黎喎,做ling, culture都冇可能未聽過
通常讀ling都唔多講ling嘅歷史![]()
![]()
戰前班人,通常都係因為contribute咗啲重要嘅concept或者寫咗啲重要嘅grammar先有人記得,好似jakobson啲distinctive features,swadesh嘅swadesh list,meillet嘅grammaticalisation,趙元任嘅grammar of spoken chinese同對phoneme嘅討論等等。
Barthes同Derria係cultral呢邊好重要
因為係佢地將ling嘅structuralism同poststructuralism帶入cultural critic
當然依家仲用唔用佢地d野就另一回事
但成日睇書,d人總鍾意quote 佢地d野
ling嚟講structuralism已經做咗過街老鼠,兩派鬥爭最鍾意就係accuse人係structuralist![]()
你話乜都會睇啲,所以咪好奇問下你會唔會睇我個科啲嘢![]()
![]()
Benjamin, Adorno 咩人來
有睇Barthes, 佢都係你果科![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Benjamin?wprov=sfsi1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno?wprov=sfsi1
冇聽過barthes![]()
現代應該冇乜影響力
講真,而家structuralist應該得返saussure,jakobson,trubetzkoy,jespersen(都唔知jespersen算唔算structuralist)同班bloomfieldians有啲人聽過![]()
現代仲抱住structuralism唔放嘅人,我淨係諗到lazard同p matthews
Roland Barthes喎
佢d應該已經冇人用,因為依家眼光睇好多缺點
但classic黎喎,做ling, culture都冇可能未聽過
通常讀ling都唔多講ling嘅歷史![]()
![]()
戰前班人,通常都係因為contribute咗啲重要嘅concept或者寫咗啲重要嘅grammar先有人記得,好似jakobson啲distinctive features,swadesh嘅swadesh list,meillet嘅grammaticalisation,趙元任嘅grammar of spoken chinese同對phoneme嘅討論等等。
Barthes同Derria係cultral呢邊好重要
因為係佢地將ling嘅structuralism同poststructuralism帶入cultural critic
當然依家仲用唔用佢地d野就另一回事
但成日睇書,d人總鍾意quote 佢地d野
ling嚟講structuralism已經做咗過街老鼠,兩派鬥爭最鍾意就係accuse人係structuralist![]()
Soci, anthro, cultural 都已經唔用structuralism
依家係Critical theory, poststrut先多
但一講歷史發展,就一定會有呢班人出現