John tsang既 election platform
頭先巴打俾d條link唔係都話要agrees with個subject咩 如果subject 同complement are different in number
其實咁嘅 我睇完資料
最common係agree with subject
但係某啲情況下兩樣都得
而以我理解 薯片佬依句如果冇錯呢
佢之所以用'is'係因為佢將'government welfare subsidies'睇做一樣野嘅總稱 所以可以用is
你咁樣兜唔洗玩啦
冷靜...
我都係講返我睇完理解到嘅野姐
因為依照我搵到嘅資料
一啲情況例如 'profit and loss'之類係considered as a singular entity所以可以寫 'Profit and loss is blah blah blah'
我講嘅係喺一個 "句野冇錯"嘅假設下嘅解釋
係依個情況下句野是錯是對我唔清楚
Subjects and complements that differ in number
“Complements” are words connected to subjects by linking verbs, as in “That fish is a monster,” where monster is the complement of the subject fish. When subjects and complements are mismatched in number (that is, one is singular and the other is plural), the verb agrees with the subject rather than with the complement, as in “The problem is too many fish,” not “The problem are too many fish,” and “Too many fish are the problem,” not “Too many fish is the problem.”
To avoid errors in subject-verb agreement, keep your eye on the prize: the subject.
係咪關呢段事
依樣就係我一開始講嘅野嘅explanation
基本上 所以情況跟依個都冇死錯
但係黎講上面位針筒巴都啱 不過要睇情況 啲條件啊之類好複雜我睇資料睇到就盲都未睇完
有冇高人用短文解釋一下
非也 希望寫essay流暢啲姐