以軍在加沙城一處援助物資領取點向人群開槍逾百死

咁你點睇佢響呢啲警戒區度衝埋去會覺得無後果?
唔通好似潑水節咁融洽一片？

被人分屍遊街就見得多。
好多好多前科，全部係有發生過嘅。

以軍話自己冇按你講既規則向人群開槍喎，反而唔想傷害市民徹退。
咁睇黎你講既「戰時交戰規則」唔多切合現實

咁唔通我有話一定要開槍殺人？
我係話開槍唔意外啫，無話一定要開喎，文盲?

無開槍即係哈馬斯講大話囉。

即係你都係覺得係以軍開槍殺平民既？
即使以軍否認都好

//video filmed close to that second location at the rear of the convoy, about half a kilometre south of the roundabout.
Volleys of gunfire can be heard and people are seen scrambling over lorries and ducking behind the vehicles. Red tracer rounds can be seen in the sky. //
Al Jazeera

//Mahmoud Awadeyah said the Israeli vehicles had started firing at people when the aid arrived. "Israelis purposefully fired at the men... they were trying to get near the trucks that had the flour," he said. "They were fired at directly and prevented people to come near those killed." //
bbc

咁又唔係得哈馬斯咁講喎

即係你都係覺得係以軍開槍殺平民既？
即使以軍否認都好

你除咗識用你覺得， 之後加你自己啲意思之外，仲識點樣問?
紅字嗰啲全部係你意思。

我無預設立場係平民定哈馬斯喎。

不如我都覺得下。
咁即係話，你覺得啲巴勒斯坦男有係有花柳定HIV?

咁哈馬斯咪同班黃絲一鳩樣

我咪答咗你#796

事實擺在眼前你都可以搬龍門
真係服左你

咁係咪即係哈馬斯同香港警察一鳩樣
咁係咪即係福比斯同李嘉誠一鳩樣
咁係咪即係福祿壽同如來佛祖一鳩樣

不如你State清楚你想比乜嘢先

咁係咪即係福比斯同李嘉誠一鳩樣

咁問喇，佢響呢啲警戒區度衝埋去，你覺得係咩人開槍？
（你覺得即使係以軍開槍都好合理）

咁你覺得衝埋去係咪好合理

唔合啊，咁佢響呢啲警戒區度衝埋去，你覺得係咩人開槍？

咁你覺得會唔會係哈馬斯開槍？
甚至係美國佬開槍
定係伊朗呢?


唔好怪我咁問，因為你係咁問。

佢應該係想講
你話哈馬斯對對西方傳媒就會講普世價值，但自己無實行過

同香港人一樣畀中共打壓就自稱世界公民，要民主自由，要普世價值，但講香港本土，歧視黑人，回教徒，伊斯蘭教徒，穆斯林，南亞，印巴，小數族裔，加沙兒童，巴勒斯坦人等等。
對自己就識分黃藍，黑警平民，黑衣白衣
對加沙就全部都當恐怖份子，細路bb都係抵死

我覺得係以軍開槍，雖然佢否認
因為有唔同台既記者報導。

咁前面咪答咗你好幾廿次。

你幫佢解嚟做乜撚？

佢自己講丫嘛，佢又唔係唔識打字
唔通佢講一講句廢話，就要人地幫佢諗埋呀？

警察水砲清真寺時香港人一樣屌警察屌到佢仆街

你又帶風向 定 你失憶

講道理啦，人身攻擊網上匿名既人冇意思

咁佢響呢啲警戒區度衝埋去，你覺得係咩人開槍？
以軍？

咁前面咪答咗你好幾廿次。

係囉，但以軍攻擊清真寺呢，有冇屌到仆街

師兄點睇以軍又要開槍又要否認