Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational
我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
但係條theorem holds for constant function wo
constant function本身continuous架啦
I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)
sin(1/x)得唔得
下年anal要靠你carry了
唔知撞唔撞時間諗緊要anal定bra
bra係咩?
algebra
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
光速post，你要快過小明。
#329冇記錯個post好似岩岩開
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
Sleep is for the weak
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
Sleep is for the weak
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
Sleep is for the weak
你有題數唔識做就會唔想訓 但係唔識做得耐又會心思思想上下連登 跟住無限loop
新人留名
Econ撚
追左我成個星期先追翻晒所有po
德國MSc中
德國msc介唔介意講邊間？
德國econ最有名學校之一
三大/非三大？ gpa？ 完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
Sleep is for the weak
你有題數唔識做就會唔想訓 但係唔識做得耐又會心思思想上下連登 跟住無限loop
X2
完全唔知上面發生咩事呀清
以為入錯post
btw, 你班友唔洗訓架？
Sleep is for the weak
Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational
我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
但係條theorem holds for constant function wo
constant function本身continuous架啦
I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)
sin(1/x)得唔得
下年anal要靠你carry了
唔知撞唔撞時間
bra係咩?
algebra
Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational
我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
但係條theorem holds for constant function wo
constant function本身continuous架啦
I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)
sin(1/x)得唔得
下年anal要靠你carry了
唔知撞唔撞時間
bra係咩?
algebra
Consider f=0 if rational, =1 if irrational
我都係咁諗,不過搵唔到value in(0,1)咪做唔到個conclusion
但係條theorem holds for constant function wo
constant function本身continuous架啦
I mean, 所以攞個value 係inclusive
即係 [f(a), f(b)] assuming f(a)<f(b)
sin(1/x)得唔得
下年anal要靠你carry了
唔知撞唔撞時間
bra係咩?
algebra
