美國聯合航空超賣，暴力拖走機艙乘客
一場笑話
1002 回覆
127 Like
23 Dislike
冇人理加到$800聽到個版本係，聯合航空超賣機位，所以俾每人800美金叫佢哋落機，片入面個人係醫生，要去應診所以堅持唔肯落機，如果就咁俾人枱走。
好似係400喎
啊 原來係咁 尋日睇新聞話400
800都係vouchers, 有乜用？
係16張 50鎂個人1年限定 vouchers
冇人理加到$800聽到個版本係，聯合航空超賣機位，所以俾每人800美金叫佢哋落機，片入面個人係醫生，要去應診所以堅持唔肯落機，如果就咁俾人枱走。
好似係400喎
啊 原來係咁 尋日睇新聞話400
800都係vouchers, 有乜用？
係16張 50鎂個人1年限定 vouchers
其實vouchers搵笨柒，咪又係洗翻落佢到
點解超賣左仲上到機 機口D人做緊咩
係佢屎忽痕要4個機組人員上機先趕人
點解超賣左仲上到機 機口D人做緊咩
你係咪盲撚左
地球嘅另一邊，日日上演緊
又係主流媒體9作標題
班機根本冇「超賣」
係UA為左要俾crew坐就踢乘客落機
唔係喎
我睇新聞話未上機已經發現超賣唔比部分人上機
有得上嘅乘客坐低之後又發現有crew要上機
再要多四個乘客落機
而且UA個聲明都話apologize for the overbook
冇話之前已overbook
其實同overbooking嘅效果無異，詞彙根本對整體理解唔係好重要。
咩原因都好
除非係賊或者恐怖分子，格梗拖人落機就點都講唔通
仲要見埋血
冇人肯走咪加大個銀碼囉
800 usd唔得咪1200 1600
仲係冇人走咪直接派cash instead of濕鳩vocher囉
雖然law書會話係一些情況下係踢到，但書本唔同實際 係香港呢d司法黑哨區係好難成功，所以唔好話香港人不懂自身權益
踢到一般係西方有法治國家
踢到一般係西方有法治國家
美國人做野係好撚唔識轉彎
果$800拎去是但買張機票實有走去搞個坐低哂既乘客咁岩重要係醫生
世界如果多d你呢種白痴仔 世界一定和平好多
閣下閱讀理解係負
reddit個post點解俾mod remove左?
reddit mod 左膠多
又關咩左膠事 呢單擺明係想幫UA冚住件事
reddit比政府同財團收買/施壓已經唔係新聞
近幾年censorship誇張到得人驚 幾無恥都做得出
有時睇到香港班崇洋狗真係忍唔住笑 賤格嘢你估鬼佬做得少？
咪又係人一個
表示非常同意
係唔撚係都censor
簡直去到阻礙閱讀既地步
我先唔信完全無干預
有咩
原本得/r/video一個post上到/r/all #1
跟住個mod用19理由del post想冚住件事
點知已經太遲太多人睇過好大反彈
極速擴散去其他sub先無事
佢地平時用同樣方法已經成功censor過好多消息
喺香港 最崇洋嗰堆就係最知得少關於洋人嘅人
Reddit sub 啲mob 始終都係一般User
r/video 其他mob都知衰左，所有
又關港豬事？？
成班5毛反香港人反到儍！
我只看到全機人都只是拍攝沒人幫手，如果香港發生，已經吊緊港豬了
成班5毛反香港人反到儍！
我只看到全機人都只是拍攝沒人幫手，如果香港發生，已經吊緊港豬了
內容大意：
。航班3411 over booking
。職員叫價$800
。無人自願轉下班機
。電腦“隨機”抽出一對夫婦
。電腦再抽出一位乘客
。乘客表示自己是醫生，明早有重要病人會面，拒絕下機
。職員召喚警察
。警察強行拖走醫生乘客
。醫生乘客撞傷面部流血，需召喚醫護人員
。整個過程被錄影上傳網絡
港豬表示：
果個人阻住起飛，唔抵可憐。
下下都港豬港豬，咪成日抽埋哂呢d劣質水啦仆街，好撚好笑呀？
港豬聽到事實發嬲
唔比$8買垃圾又屌 又唔批評得
講事實港豬做得差 又唔批評得
香港人惡撚過共產黨
揸住「本土」、「香港人」個名真係無撚敵
做得差都唔比屌唔比批評
呢排多左好撚多呢D 懶係撐自己人既comment
好啦外地人屌你本地人你又可以話人地冇資格
我本地人都唔屌得本地人?
琴日壞地鐵有人暈低響車入面月台既人都係得個睇字炸
唔屌得呀?
個啲傻閪連基本邏輯都無就學人「討論」
800美金全機冇人落
睇黎大家都好趕
睇黎大家都好趕
CEO 封員工信同Summary真係呢
Dear Team,
Like you, I was upset to see and hear about what happened last night aboard United Express Flight 3411 headed from Chicago to Louisville. While the facts and circumstances are still evolving, especially with respect to why this customer defied Chicago Aviation Security Officers the way he did, to give you a clearer picture of what transpired, I've included below a recap from the preliminary reports filed by our employees.
As you will read, this situation was unfortunately compounded when one of the passengers we politely asked to deplane refused and it became necessary to contact Chicago Aviation Security Officers to help. Our employees followed established procedures for dealing with situations like this. While I deeply regret this situation arose, I also emphatically stand behind all of you, and I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right.
I do, however, believe there are lessons we can learn from this experience, and we are taking a close look at the circumstances surrounding this incident. Treating our customers and each other with respect and dignity is at the core of who we are, and we must always remember this no matter how challenging the situation.
Oscar
Summary of Flight 3411
. On Sunday, April 9, after United Express Flight 3411 was fully boarded, United's gate agents were approached by crewmembers that were told they needed to board the flight.
. We sought volunteers and then followed our involuntary denial of boarding process (including offering up to $1,000 in compensation) and when we approached one of these passengers to explain apologetically that he was being denied boarding, he raised his voice and refused to comply with crew member instructions.
. He was approached a few more times after that in order to gain his compliance to come off the aircraft, and each time he refused and became more and more disruptive and belligerent.
. Our agents were left with no choice but to call Chicago Aviation Security Officers to assist in removing the customer from the flight. He repeatedly declined to leave.
. Chicago Aviation Security Officers were unable to gain his cooperation and physically removed him from the flight as he continued to resist - running back onto the aircraft in defiance of both our crew and security officials.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-united-ceo-oscar-munoz-letter-20170410-story.html
Dear Team,
Like you, I was upset to see and hear about what happened last night aboard United Express Flight 3411 headed from Chicago to Louisville. While the facts and circumstances are still evolving, especially with respect to why this customer defied Chicago Aviation Security Officers the way he did, to give you a clearer picture of what transpired, I've included below a recap from the preliminary reports filed by our employees.
As you will read, this situation was unfortunately compounded when one of the passengers we politely asked to deplane refused and it became necessary to contact Chicago Aviation Security Officers to help. Our employees followed established procedures for dealing with situations like this. While I deeply regret this situation arose, I also emphatically stand behind all of you, and I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right.
I do, however, believe there are lessons we can learn from this experience, and we are taking a close look at the circumstances surrounding this incident. Treating our customers and each other with respect and dignity is at the core of who we are, and we must always remember this no matter how challenging the situation.
Oscar
Summary of Flight 3411
. On Sunday, April 9, after United Express Flight 3411 was fully boarded, United's gate agents were approached by crewmembers that were told they needed to board the flight.
. We sought volunteers and then followed our involuntary denial of boarding process (including offering up to $1,000 in compensation) and when we approached one of these passengers to explain apologetically that he was being denied boarding, he raised his voice and refused to comply with crew member instructions.
. He was approached a few more times after that in order to gain his compliance to come off the aircraft, and each time he refused and became more and more disruptive and belligerent.
. Our agents were left with no choice but to call Chicago Aviation Security Officers to assist in removing the customer from the flight. He repeatedly declined to leave.
. Chicago Aviation Security Officers were unable to gain his cooperation and physically removed him from the flight as he continued to resist - running back onto the aircraft in defiance of both our crew and security officials.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-united-ceo-oscar-munoz-letter-20170410-story.html
又係主流媒體9作標題
班機根本冇「超賣」
係UA為左要俾crew坐就踢乘客落機
唔係喎
我睇新聞話未上機已經發現超賣唔比部分人上機
有得上嘅乘客坐低之後又發現有crew要上機
再要多四個乘客落機
而且UA個聲明都話apologize for the overbook
冇話之前已overbook
其實同overbooking嘅效果無異，詞彙根本對整體理解唔係好重要。
咩原因都好
除非係賊或者恐怖分子，格梗拖人落機就點都講唔通
仲要見埋血
冇人肯走咪加大個銀碼囉
800 usd唔得咪1200 1600
仲係冇人走咪直接派cash instead of濕鳩vocher囉
4個鐘車程, 幫果4個 crew call uber 好過啦
好拖唔拖 拖走個醫生
應該可以告到佢要懲罰性賠償
因為佢經常故意超賣，明顯係故意無視超賣對乘客造成嘅損失/傷害
醫生今次fat fat
呢d仆街公司應該殺一儆百
你買機票果陣已經同意左隱藏既條款架啦。
航空公司會根據優先次序踢人走架
錯，你估好似香港垃圾法官
國外會考慮條款是否合理， 唔係簽左當認同
國際金融生番智慧
邊個同你講香港法官會唔睇合約內容合理性
law書話有考慮
實際案例完全同國外唔同
香港法律界人士:er...香港法官傾向保守
。。
見到呢d 新聞就知實有一堆港豬話如果係港豬就點點點
你看下香港jr case同告政府的案例，香港法院的判決同言論係咩
你就明law友講的相對保守點
你就明law友講的相對保守點