柴田妹 2年時間交到貨未
誰家柒頭無閪摸
605 回覆
201 Like
4 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁
柴b
吓，咩邏輯，而家我要證明做Programmer唔係有手有腳就做到，我嘅行動係要做唔到，先支持到我嘅講法。
但你係相反，係你話Programmer in any fields都可以好輕易做到，所以你為咗Prove呢點，你要做到喎？
戇鳩邏輯仲衝出嚟柒
但你係相反，係你話Programmer in any fields都可以好輕易做到，所以你為咗Prove呢點，你要做到喎？
戇鳩邏輯仲衝出嚟柒
似係你真心左
一句講晒
我一月中前寫到你捐 $780HKD
我寫唔到 我寫唔到我捐 $100USD
Ok 唔 Ok?
A new Turing complete programming language that can run on different platforms
Ok?
我一月中前寫到你捐 $780HKD
我寫唔到 我寫唔到我捐 $100USD
Ok 唔 Ok?
A new Turing complete programming language that can run on different platforms
Ok?
好
寫到你哋唔好再歧視女 developers 同埋非 CS 人
An apology would be nice but not necessary
寫到你哋唔好再歧視女 developers 同埋非 CS 人
An apology would be nice but not necessary
柴田b
推
An apology would be nice but not necessary
柴田係聖誕節都無得放假
唔知柴b要用幾多個聖誕先交到貨
搞緊BLM
公司董事識唔識寫compiler
推
我真係好撚中意柴田b
1. Jobs and Woz. 我話jobs 嘅 vision 同著重 experience 係apple 成功因素
講 tech apple 唔係最好
但計 ecosystem design 同 user experience 好過啲追 spec 嘅 android 機
Jobs 死咗後嘅apple 就唔好提 cook 好明顯冇 jobs 嘅 vision
Woz 都好成功但 個人認為jobs 影響大啲
而jobs 係有EE 底但比 Woz 之類佢完全唔係 technica
2. 行行出狀元但 真係好多差 programmer 呃飯食
或者有啲執著完美主義 搞啲technologically advanced 但 not totally usable 嘅嘢
That’s why Linux is a niche product
It’s great in many ways, but the user experience is not as seamless as that of apple’s
我亦都冇話唔各師其職
我祇係話唔係一定要有 CS degree 先得
的確大把programmer 都唔係正統CS 出身
反而似係你睇唔係呢啲人多過我睇唔起 CS 人
3. 我上邊都寫明除非係high performance proprietary system ,好多時 performance 唔係最重要因素
寫 query set data schema 都有技巧
但 3NF star schemes 甚至 kimball data warehousing 之類已經可以自學學到唔少
四年 CS 係會有根底但寫 program 都係要靠磨靠實戰
Theory sorting algorithm problem solving skills design pattern etc 有心學都一定學到
個 developer mindset 同個 degree 冇乜關係
唔少非 CS 都好勁 大把 CS 人都冇乜呢啲 sense
IT 界係有良莠不齊嘅問題
而科技轉得太快會有青黃不接都係問題
CS 人都要接受呢個事實
就係有 15-30% 真係勁人
同埋好多呃飯食
4. 我係話好似佢哋啲勁人唔會咁玻璃心
唔係話我好似佢咁勁 或者想痴埋去
我本身都唔係 tech 亦都冇打算做
我都知我想都做唔到
但啲 tech 啲 ego 真係好好笑
冇人用嘅 tech 幾勁都冇用
講 tech apple 唔係最好
但計 ecosystem design 同 user experience 好過啲追 spec 嘅 android 機
Jobs 死咗後嘅apple 就唔好提 cook 好明顯冇 jobs 嘅 vision
Woz 都好成功但 個人認為jobs 影響大啲
而jobs 係有EE 底但比 Woz 之類佢完全唔係 technica
2. 行行出狀元但 真係好多差 programmer 呃飯食
或者有啲執著完美主義 搞啲technologically advanced 但 not totally usable 嘅嘢
That’s why Linux is a niche product
It’s great in many ways, but the user experience is not as seamless as that of apple’s
我亦都冇話唔各師其職
我祇係話唔係一定要有 CS degree 先得
的確大把programmer 都唔係正統CS 出身
反而似係你睇唔係呢啲人多過我睇唔起 CS 人
3. 我上邊都寫明除非係high performance proprietary system ,好多時 performance 唔係最重要因素
寫 query set data schema 都有技巧
但 3NF star schemes 甚至 kimball data warehousing 之類已經可以自學學到唔少
四年 CS 係會有根底但寫 program 都係要靠磨靠實戰
Theory sorting algorithm problem solving skills design pattern etc 有心學都一定學到
個 developer mindset 同個 degree 冇乜關係
唔少非 CS 都好勁 大把 CS 人都冇乜呢啲 sense
IT 界係有良莠不齊嘅問題
而科技轉得太快會有青黃不接都係問題
CS 人都要接受呢個事實
就係有 15-30% 真係勁人
同埋好多呃飯食
4. 我係話好似佢哋啲勁人唔會咁玻璃心
唔係話我好似佢咁勁 或者想痴埋去
我本身都唔係 tech 亦都冇打算做
我都知我想都做唔到
但啲 tech 啲 ego 真係好好笑
冇人用嘅 tech 幾勁都冇用
牙柴當年有冇vision到自己走數三年
CS 人都要接受呢個事實
就係有 15-30% 真係勁人
同埋好多呃飯食
就係有 15-30% 真係勁人
同埋好多呃飯食
牙柴其實係咪呃飯食
唔係真架
牙柴真材實料架
唔係真架
牙柴真材實料架
CS 人都要接受呢個事實
我身為女拳人接受唔到呢個事實
推
等睇樓主搬龍門
最近掛住拍拖今個 weekend 要好好咁寫
最近掛住拍拖今個 weekend 要好好咁寫