澤連斯基由頭到尾只係想要美國願意保障烏克蘭安全

318 回覆
548 Like 70 Dislike
2025-03-01 10:36:29
而家係要人賣礦賣稀土
2025-03-01 10:37:47
唔俾咪即刻斷軍援
即時斷左軍援之後烏克蘭會點你答下我?
比一半礦產既理由有未?
2025-03-01 10:38:22
點解要科幾千億美金無條件幫你?咁咪唔好叫人幫囉
2025-03-01 10:38:42
你有冇睇過個memorandum?先唔講memorandum 唔係正式國際條款,宜家係俄羅斯無遵守協議內容,但我睇唔到個memorandum 有講要保障烏克蘭獨立。
The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine;
尊重佢係一個有主權嘅國家同保障烏克蘭獨立係完全兩件事

The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used

"commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine" 宜家有冇做到?provide assistance又係咪一定no cost and unlimited?
2025-03-01 10:41:27
美國可以唔幫架,依家係稀土又要,安全又唔幫喎
2025-03-01 10:41:29
根本勁多人只係睇傳媒吹風既跟風仔 自己少少research 都無做 個memorandum 咩內容唔知 咩叫做memorandum 同國際條款有咩分別又唔知 人屌我又屌 一啲獨立思考都無
2025-03-01 10:41:58
其實根本就係一場show同 trump嘅圈套
簽咗就賣國唔簽就俾藉口人收水等死
2025-03-01 10:42:58
要美國保證安全
但又即時質疑美國以前既保障冇效

幾有趣
2025-03-01 10:44:04
咁咪唔好簽囉
2025-03-01 10:44:19
咁話澤仔
2025-03-01 10:44:26
你唔識字?
2025-03-01 10:44:35
咁咪睇下個談判雙方有咩籌碼囉

而家烏克蘭即時無左美國軍援會點?會唔會即刻輸?
美國即時唔俾軍援烏克蘭又點?美國拎唔到烏克蘭稀土又會唔會即刻無稀土用?
2025-03-01 10:44:36
都係嗰句

如果無安全保障,咪攬炒畀俄狗食晒成個烏克蘭
2025-03-01 10:44:47
由一開始傾2個stand point根本唔同
侵/美帝係要和平停戰
澤係要借武器借兵力繼續打落去

而而家傾左咁耐叫做達成左共識,
今次澤黎白宮係交返場戲簽名做議式野
烏國會都通過左先黎簽
係澤而家單方面where爛塊面繼續黎R軍備唔跟劇本行
V先話佢唔尊重

究竟班人(唔講五毛) 有無睇
2025-03-01 10:45:35
咪唔好簽, 直接投降都唔洗無咗一半礦產,點解要無咗天然資源仲要無保護
2025-03-01 10:45:35
無條件軍事援助你? 幾千億咁free比你?
2025-03-01 10:46:26
所以啲人都唔識睇形勢
美國無咗烏克蘭又唔會有咩大損失
烏克蘭一無美國即一定好快亡國
咁都好意思咁嘅態度同人講野
2025-03-01 10:46:26
呢一刻歐洲見你認誠左重會唔會投入資本履行番自己責任?
2025-03-01 10:46:26
係美國總統代美國簽
所以你就有責任至少出黎講句係冇約束力
我睬你都有味
2025-03-01 10:46:56
直接唔幫,同唔幫加攞你一半,邊樣對烏克蘭差啲
2025-03-01 10:47:09
澤仔邊有R軍備 佢係想美國承諾保障烏克蘭日後既安全
侵都完全答唔到如果普京違反停火協議會點
2025-03-01 10:47:10
係呀
所以消滅廣東話融入大灣區 我幾時都話係啱嘅
2025-03-01 10:47:11
萬斯直頭似離地弱智
2025-03-01 10:47:18
仲有成日話安全問題

侵話會有美國人黎烏採礦果句
已經間接話你知佢會睇住個場
起碼烏境內安全先會叫人黎採架啦
人地都講到出面你仲屈佢唔幫係咪on99
2025-03-01 10:47:26
無錯呀 咁就考慮下如果俄羅斯吞併烏克蘭呢件事上面 排下邊個受最大影響
到底係烏克蘭人?歐洲定係美國受影響先?
排到個次序咪知邊個有大份啲既責任出力先囉
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞