IT討論區(152) - 我要搶1001
強力飲水
1001 回覆
2 Like
4 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁第 38 頁第 39 頁第 40 頁第 41 頁
個gui應該會叫___tree
但唔想用手巴命名
但唔想用手巴命名
其實都係見啱就請，佢地it team 2年前都200幾人
仲要不嬲turnover高
仲要不嬲turnover高
唔係
房署it位正？
hktv it trainee有無人做過？
識人都係做呢類
理論上個日無會開就真係無人會搵
爽死了
理論上個日無會開就真係無人會搵
爽死了
https://serializethoughts.com/2016/07/16/linux-threads-are-standard-process
In case of Linux kernel, there is no difference between a process and a thread.
愈睇愈唔明咩係thread
In case of Linux kernel, there is no difference between a process and a thread.
愈睇愈唔明咩係thread
False
In linux, from the view point of kernel, there is no thread nor process, there is only task
Some task does not share any execution context
Some task shares some execution context with other task, for example memory space
When you clone a new task with some particular flag, the task looks like a thread from the view point of programmer
Note that the viewpoint of linux kernel is quite different from windows, as windows sees process as owner of resources and thread as unit of execution
Don’t try to compare these two ideas. Instead treat these two viewpoints as two different features provided by two systems, and process/thread is your abstraction.
Some task does not share any execution context
Some task shares some execution context with other task, for example memory space
When you clone a new task with some particular flag, the task looks like a thread from the view point of programmer
Note that the viewpoint of linux kernel is quite different from windows, as windows sees process as owner of resources and thread as unit of execution
Don’t try to compare these two ideas. Instead treat these two viewpoints as two different features provided by two systems, and process/thread is your abstraction.
