yeahyeah724
2018-02-13 09:53:33
樓主,其實睇樓上引用呢個court case 。警察落曬口供,拎曬証據,就去問律証司,由律証司決定起訴/唔起訴,同用邊條罪起訴。 跟上面個court case用:-s.124 of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200.
“(1) Subject to subsection (2), a man who has unlawful sexual intercourse
with a girl under the age of 16 shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable
on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for 5 years.
(2) Where a marriage is invalid under section 27(2) of the Marriage
Ordinance (Cap. 181) by reason of the wife being under the age of 16, the
invalidity shall not make the husband guilty of an offence under this section
because he has sexual intercourse with her, if he believes her to be his wife
and has reasonable cause for the belief.”
打官司,一係唔認罪,佢用咩例告你,然後你証明你唔吻合條例所做既。 So Wai Lun v HKSAR <就係被告認為/覺得個女仔係夠16歲,仲大過。二係求情。