足球員葉嘉宇涉強姦判囚 上訴得直定罪撤銷 上訴庭：原審胡雅文引導陪審團犯錯 無提被告或真誠以為同意性交

13:43 2025-06-19

曾效力港超聯球隊理文、現屬國強體育會的28歲足球員葉嘉宇，4年前相約初相識的17歲女學生外出，涉在私家車內強姦女方。陪審團前年大比數裁定葉嘉宇強姦罪成，被判囚5年3個月。他不服定罪及刑罰提出上訴，高等法院上訴庭今頒布判詞，裁定原審法官胡雅文引導陪審團時未有提及被告可能出於真意但錯誤相信(genuine but mistaken belief)女事主願意與他性交，令葉失去無罪裁決機會，構成重大程序錯誤及不公，以致定罪裁決不穩妥，故裁定葉嘉宇上訴得直，獲撤銷定罪及刑罰。

高等法院法官胡雅文2023年10月判刑時指，女事主事後患創傷後遺症，自尊心及自信心大減，進一步影響其自我形象、人際交往、情緒穩定、社交能力及學業表現，而被告被裁定強姦罪成後仍堅稱自己無辜，力申他沒有強姦女事主，相信當時雙方正處於曖昧及感情關係初步發展的階段。法官胡雅文考慮被告無案底及重犯機會不高，但沒有使用安全套屬加刑因素，判他入獄5年3個月。

葉嘉宇一方上訴時提到，女事主案發前頻繁聯繫，願意與葉深夜見面，沒有強烈拒絕親密行為，為葉兩度口交，期間問葉是否有女友或是否常與他人調情，葉回應「你咁睇我架」，女事主便拍肩安撫葉。高等法院上訴庭副庭長麥機智、上訴庭法官薛偉成及彭寶琴認為這些行為均可能令葉以為女事主同意親密行為及性交，而女事主作供時亦指葉「可能不認為這是強姦」，她也不能百分百肯定葉是把陽具還是手指插入其陰道，顯示事件存在葉「真誠但錯誤相信」女事主願意性交的可能性。

上訴庭認為法官胡雅文應指引陪審團考慮葉當時是否真誠相信女事主同認性交，魯莽地未有涵蓋「真誠但錯誤相信」的指引，導致陪審團未充分考慮葉的犯罪意圖（mens rea），構成重大錯誤，奪去葉或可被陪審團裁定罪脫的機會，令定罪不穩妥，終裁定葉上訴得直，撤銷其定罪及刑罰。

案件編號：CACC185/2023

唔好意思之前判錯咗

呢個肥婆傻鳩黎

呢個肥婆傻鳩黎

女事主案發前頻繁聯繫，願意與葉深夜見面，沒有強烈拒絕親密行為，為葉兩度口交

之前咁都告得入！？

屌啊 口交埋都入到？？笑咗

係咁架啦
this is justice

垃圾法官

她也不能百分百肯定葉是把陽具還是手指插入其陰道.

手指同陽具size正常應該差好遠呀

有冇發還重審先？

依家係咁
支那有個case 排拖幾年定婚 條女一直唔比搞
訂婚準備結婚 個男終於有日搞到條女 搞完條女告個老強

Hon Zervos JA:

49. I was the single judge who refused the applicant’s application for leave to appeal against his conviction, which was primarily based on the issue of genuine but mistaken belief ...

52. Having previously assessed the evidence as not providing a foundation that the applicant may have mistakenly believed X was consenting, I am now of the view that such a foundation has been established and agree with the judgment of Macrae VP ... [U]pon an extensive reappraisal of the facts and circumstances of the case in light of the relevant legal principles, certain matters came into sharper focus, providing the evidential foundation for a genuine belief direction.

屌你咩Zervos，之前唔批上訴許可，而家又轉軚

可能葉嘉宇係手指size...

男嘅太細定條女太鬆

大陸仲有單，條女話要條仔搞佢。條條唔搞，條女告佢中止強姦，唔知乜鳩。

睇到 胡雅文 判嘅，都有頭緒啦

下次記得簽性交同意書

86. A matter which I considered to be significant was that X physically resisted the applicant’s advances and repeatedly said, “No”, and it would appear that the jury, by its verdict, accepted her evidence. However, there was also evidence of genuine belief that was not addressed, and hence the jury were not directed to consider this defence. The lack of this direction was a material irregularity that rendered the conviction unsafe and unsatisfactory.

已經話no仲要推開佢
仲有咩空間會令被告覺得事主有consent

想口交唔代表想性交

法治

兩公婆都可以告強姦，果次唔比就唔比

我覺得呢個情景機率最大
d女覺得含同搞係兩回事

女：插閪同插口好大分別