鄒幸彤被控煽惑去年六四集結 原被陳慧敏判囚15個月 張慧玲裁定上訴得直 定罪撤銷 鄒幸彤：「估唔到喎」

判案書話證明有煽動意圖，上訴成功係挑戰禁止令合法性成功，結果變成煽動他人參與無合法被禁止嘅集會

就係俾你贏，咁律正師先可以上訴到終審法院再判你輸

律政司講咗唔上訴?

57. 本席認為，關鍵是警官必須符合條文的要求，當被檢‍控人士作出挑戰，而警官未能證明其合理相信，指示便屬不合法，違反指示亦非違法。如 James案本身所述：
“[39] … the starting point is the power to give a direction in section 14(1) of the POA 1986. It is plain that it requires the senior officer to hold the necessary belief that a public assembly may result in serious public disorder, and to have reasonable grounds for that belief. If, upon challenge by a person accused of an offence under section 14(5), the officer cannot prove that he actually held the necessary belief and did so upon reasonable grounds, his direction would be unlawful. It is necessarily implicit in section 14(5) that the direction containing the conditions must be lawful. Acquittal would follow, if it were not. …
[40] If the officer holds that belief on reasonable grounds, the conditions imposed by the direction must be such as ‘appear to him necessary to prevent such disorder’. Again, that “necessity” must genuinely appear to him. If no such necessity had appeared to him, the condition would not be lawful; non-compliance with it would not be an offence. …”
58. 由此可見，如果警官的指示不符合條文提出的要求，便不合法。同樣地，《公安條例》第9(4)條要求警方只可適度限制集會，並只能在其他措施或條件不可達到相關目的，才可禁止集會。 如果警方沒有考慮其他措施或條件， 或不合理地認為施加集會條件不可達到禁止集會的相同目的，禁止集會便不合法。

如果我無理解錯
問題應該係果陣堆黑狗一味我唔知我睇唔到就直接ban左
所以先搞到咁柒

走啦

點解2020單案就要坐

應該係話被告可以在criminal proceeding挑戰禁令legality or not
This is appeal case第一個issue

重有幾單玩緊你，告少你一單有乜所謂，重可以令有啲人覺得香港司法重有啲公義

因為在場警員並非大型活動策劃組人員

成個監倉都係政治犯

班黑警就係衰兩樣嘢

1. 當日支聯會申請集會，班狗同支聯會就開會討論，支聯會亦都提出過一堆防疫要求，講到明話任何合理嘅措施都會盡力去配合。但係班狗都冇認真考慮過呢啲要求，一味淨係識得質疑「你哋有冇能力去執行㗎」。所以班狗係冇盡責任去提出防疫條件，同埋便利支聯會舉行集會

2. 當初喺裁判法院嘅時候，控方就話警察其實有問衛生署意見，衛生署答返佢哋唔建議進行集會。但係班狗其實係拒絕完個集會申請之後先至問衛生署意見，所以只係補返份報告，當初做決定嘅時候完全無諗到去諮詢衞生署。同埋份報告都只係話「唔建議除口罩食嘢嘅大型集會」，但係六四集會係根本唔會除口罩集體食嘢

咁就可以做永久案例 , 叫親人集會都犯法

仲有偉大既人大釋法

你講得啱
第一個issue都imply咗

一定係美國佬施加壓力

直接人大一次過釋法算啦

阿牛：香港仲有公義

吊

好快出去散心

估唔到喎

要啦
判詞話刑事案被告有權事後挑戰警方集會禁令是否有合法性從而話自己無罪
今次就係因為被告被落咗一個不合法嘅禁令而令佢就算有「煽惑」都唔入罪
仲有警方要盡一切努力去確保集會「可以」進行
呢兩樣野DOJ同警方應該都無可能接受到