計劃進修PhD/Research討論區(17) Windows JJ快d backup

1001 回覆
6 Like 1 Dislike
2017-05-16 14:12:33




2017-05-16 14:17:02



2017-05-16 14:17:16





2017-05-16 14:22:15





2017-05-16 14:43:53



2017-05-16 14:57:09




2017-05-16 15:29:33






2017-05-16 16:02:23



2017-05-16 16:05:03




2017-05-16 16:05:49




2017-05-16 16:24:16
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔

Thanks michael巴 用table?
2017-05-16 16:38:59
錯到九彩,Peer Review 完全無用。


"The error isn’t just an isolated typo: ‘neuropeptide’ occurs 27 times in the paper, while the correct terms for the non-peptides are never used.

I’m amazed that this snafu made it through peer review. It’s a simple mistake; presumably whoever wrote the paper saw oxytocin and vasopressin referred to as “neuropeptides” and thought that the term was a generic one meaning “signalling molecule.” That kind of mistake could happen to anyone, so we shouldn’t be too harsh on the authors, but expert peer review is supposed to catch such issues. It clearly failed in this case."

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/05/08/neuropeptides-peer-review/#.WRq6JqNh1UP
2017-05-16 16:41:03







2017-05-16 16:42:02









2017-05-16 16:49:17
錯到九彩,Peer Review 完全無用。


"The error isn’t just an isolated typo: ‘neuropeptide’ occurs 27 times in the paper, while the correct terms for the non-peptides are never used.

I’m amazed that this snafu made it through peer review. It’s a simple mistake; presumably whoever wrote the paper saw oxytocin and vasopressin referred to as “neuropeptides” and thought that the term was a generic one meaning “signalling molecule.” That kind of mistake could happen to anyone, so we shouldn’t be too harsh on the authors, but expert peer review is supposed to catch such issues. It clearly failed in this case."

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/05/08/neuropeptides-peer-review/#.WRq6JqNh1UP

2017-05-16 16:51:33
錯到九彩,Peer Review 完全無用。


"The error isn’t just an isolated typo: ‘neuropeptide’ occurs 27 times in the paper, while the correct terms for the non-peptides are never used.

I’m amazed that this snafu made it through peer review. It’s a simple mistake; presumably whoever wrote the paper saw oxytocin and vasopressin referred to as “neuropeptides” and thought that the term was a generic one meaning “signalling molecule.” That kind of mistake could happen to anyone, so we shouldn’t be too harsh on the authors, but expert peer review is supposed to catch such issues. It clearly failed in this case."

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/05/08/neuropeptides-peer-review/#.WRq6JqNh1UP


2017-05-16 17:06:21
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔

Thanks michael巴 用table?

我都唔知點搞 我得閒再整
可能下個禮拜搭飛機無聊個陣搞
2017-05-16 17:10:59
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔

Thanks michael巴 用table?

我都唔知點搞 我得閒再整
可能下個禮拜搭飛機無聊個陣搞

等你約
2017-05-16 17:24:14
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔

Thanks michael巴 用table?

我都唔知點搞 我得閒再整
可能下個禮拜搭飛機無聊個陣搞

等你約

2017-05-16 17:30:52








2017-05-16 18:18:06









2017-05-16 18:48:49










2017-05-16 18:49:50





2017-05-16 18:51:53
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔

Thanks michael巴 用table?

我都唔知點搞 我得閒再整
可能下個禮拜搭飛機無聊個陣搞

等你約

你去你度搵你
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞