我一陣得閒organize下個word檔
錯到九彩,Peer Review 完全無用。
"The error isn’t just an isolated typo: ‘neuropeptide’ occurs 27 times in the paper, while the correct terms for the non-peptides are never used.
I’m amazed that this snafu made it through peer review. It’s a simple mistake; presumably whoever wrote the paper saw oxytocin and vasopressin referred to as “neuropeptides” and thought that the term was a generic one meaning “signalling molecule.” That kind of mistake could happen to anyone, so we shouldn’t be too harsh on the authors, but expert peer review is supposed to catch such issues. It clearly failed in this case."
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/05/08/neuropeptides-peer-review/#.WRq6JqNh1UP
錯到九彩,Peer Review 完全無用。
"The error isn’t just an isolated typo: ‘neuropeptide’ occurs 27 times in the paper, while the correct terms for the non-peptides are never used.
I’m amazed that this snafu made it through peer review. It’s a simple mistake; presumably whoever wrote the paper saw oxytocin and vasopressin referred to as “neuropeptides” and thought that the term was a generic one meaning “signalling molecule.” That kind of mistake could happen to anyone, so we shouldn’t be too harsh on the authors, but expert peer review is supposed to catch such issues. It clearly failed in this case."
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2017/05/08/neuropeptides-peer-review/#.WRq6JqNh1UP
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔
Thanks michael巴 用table?
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔
Thanks michael巴 用table?
我都唔知點搞 我得閒再整
可能下個禮拜搭飛機無聊個陣搞
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔
Thanks michael巴 用table?
我都唔知點搞 我得閒再整
可能下個禮拜搭飛機無聊個陣搞
等你約
我一陣得閒organize下個word檔
Thanks michael巴 用table?
我都唔知點搞 我得閒再整
可能下個禮拜搭飛機無聊個陣搞
等你約