自己生日要送萬幾蚊既物禮俾人

530 回覆
203 Like 814 Dislike
2021-01-25 11:47:00
最怕遇到呢類同事
2021-01-25 12:13:03
你都痴撚線
結婚係雙向㗎dllm
2021-01-25 16:15:58
你諗到咁多野去反駁我, 咁你自己一早應該有答案

但你偏偏出post 話睇唔開, 代表你連自己都説服唔到, 接受唔到個事實

你明顯知自己係工人, 但唔想認啫
2021-01-25 17:23:31
我見你句句都講到咁老定, 好奇問下姐。
2021-01-25 17:56:22
現實同理論既野
唔好理老唔老定先
講返現實
無論係主觀定客觀因素
樓豬又真係朝工人呢個方向行緊
如果廿幾歲 都重有時間可以改變既
一旦定咗型就
2021-01-25 19:14:31
我男人黎其實 你真係cls
2021-01-25 19:20:03
老婆搵6萬幾,老公2萬幾
但係供樓就6 比 4
仲要層樓係老婆名

將心比幾你老母咩
2021-01-25 19:21:34
臭鴨, 收皮啦
2021-01-25 19:24:43
供樓只有一個人名我覺得好合理
無理由浪費一個人頭
預左買第二間免稅
2021-01-25 19:28:15
去到150咁後先有呢個comment
就知香港個價值觀幾咁9
2021-01-25 20:21:17
條女已大怨氣 ,唔甘心,覺得自己值得好啲,佢個日係發洩。
2021-01-25 21:52:01
睇到半睇唔落去。咁大個男人婚都結埋仲學人講志願學人砌木屋仔,唔講以為果個唔係你老婆係你老母
Jupas時同老母講我志願係教書,母親節砌返間屋仔俾老母咪算囉,你娶咩老婆啫??
咁你生日,係你老母生你嘛,佢想要你送個袋超合理喎
2021-01-25 22:37:27
佢生日送張離婚申請書比佢
佢實畢生難忘
2021-01-25 22:50:42
你冇同佢認真溝通。唔知你點識佢 但如果你地係同一個起跑線 一早就應該要講
2021-01-25 22:53:23
遲啲想送有冇得送
有得送嗰陣時送下冇所謂啦
橫掂啲錢留返喺度 都係用嚟擺
2021-01-25 23:58:25
珍惜啦 真係貪錢就唔會同樓主呢種人一齊
2021-01-25 23:58:54
樓主可以收皮了
2021-01-26 00:00:47
有錢vs窮人 完。
金錢價值觀唔對等 冇話邊個錯邊個啱
2021-01-26 00:44:32
世界真細小
2021-01-26 02:22:22
都結咗婚點解唔俾哂D錢叫老婆管理?佢要買咪係戶口度出,煩惱小好多
佢要出錢自然會就住買架啦
2021-01-26 08:16:37
You sure
2021-01-26 08:20:02
B. Pre-marital agreements and public policy

Historically, pre-marital agreements were regarded as being contrary to public policy on the grounds that provision for a divorced wife and children of the family is a matter of public concern. In UK case Bennett v Bennett, the court said that “it is in the public interest that the wife and children of a divorced husband should not be left dependent on public assistance or on charity when he has the means to support them”.

For example, if a party had not given full and frank disclosure before the signing of the pre-marital agreement and the wife is left destitute under the agreement, the agreement may be contrary to public policy. Another example might be that since the marriage, the parties' financial situations may have drastically changed (for the better or worse), thus what was initially agreed under the pre-marital agreement might not be “fair” or reflective of the parties’ living standard during the marriage.

Later, the UK court in the Radmachner case stated that pre-marital agreements are not contrary to public policy. However, this view is just of persuasive value in Hong Kong. Furthermore, pre-marital agreements cannot restrict parties from applying to the court for orders for financial arrangements.

In 2011, the Hong Kong court briefly acknowledged the Radmacher case, and stated an observation of the modern trend of nuptial agreements being recognized. However, Radmacher is not binding in law in Hong Kong. Until the Courts in Hong Kong or the legislature fully accept the binding effect of nuptial agreements, nuptial agreements, other than separation agreements, will continue not to be binding in a court of law. Nevertheless, the UK decisions have provided Hong Kong courts with some guidance on the status of nuptial agreements when determining ancillary relief and asset division in matrimonial matters
2021-01-26 08:21:42
閪就閪啲 鬼叫人哋老婆搵六萬幾 自己搵兩萬幾
人哋仲肯要你就算啦 雖然可能佢搵唔到人埋單先搵你

另外 有份供但無名咁撚鳩 一係就全部佢供唔要名 點解有份俾都無名 結婚前點deal㗎

唔係你肯埋單應該點都有啲著數? 鄭少秋都叫發咗達呀 你乜都無嘅?
2021-01-26 08:22:15
假撚到
你老婆貪你夠廢啊?
2021-01-26 08:39:53
結婚後其實係共產了
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台潮流台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台成人台黑 洞