反國安法六旬婦堵路判緩刑 求情稱「警察宿舍賣冰個女仔都放生」

204 回覆
1120 Like 7 Dislike
2020-09-16 19:00:35
2020-09-16 19:02:40
因為無法治
2020-09-16 19:38:59
阻塞交通 d車連環相撞點算
2020-09-16 19:40:36
2020-09-16 19:59:54
人地有名有姓叫高可晴




2020-09-16 21:02:13
堅過石堅
2020-09-16 21:33:32
2020-09-16 23:35:56
我唔係話doj決定可以被推翻
Dont distort my words
2020-09-16 23:42:12
To be honest, almost every case in the HK judiciary with appeal history underpins what I have said.

A CFI verdict can be overturned by CA. A CA verdict can be overturned by CFA. As simple as that.
What I mean is the judiciary as a whole has the final power of adjudication which all other parties (including DOJ) must come to terms with.
You may consult this book to know more about the HK Legal System, even though it is a bit outdated.

https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Hong-Kong-Legal-System/dp/0195860004
2020-09-16 23:45:05
I still feel a bit uncomfortable that you are comparing the entire DOJ to a magistrate/judge.
It is like comparing an apple to an orange.
2020-09-16 23:47:23
Definitely not. I have already said that DOJ enjoys the ultimate power to prosecute.
2020-09-16 23:53:40
yes. This is completely wt i have said.
DOJ has the power to prosecute. Even though the court might think prosecuting the defendant in question is unnecessary/inappropriate, DOJ still can proceed with the prosecution.
Did you misunderstand my words above?
2020-09-17 00:57:13
2020-09-17 01:04:04
勇武師奶
2020-09-17 08:04:52
2020-09-17 10:42:57
Yes 係回應你後句
2020-09-17 10:46:41
法官係一個人
律政司係一個機構
點比呀?

你鍾意比自己比飽去
快啲出去周圍同人講你偉論啦
2020-09-17 11:03:04
你喜歡啦,我都係唔明你噏乜鳩
你出少啲lihkg 鳩post
睇多啲書,唔好出到去同人講,將一個機構嘅權力同一個人比較
吹水台自選台熱 門最 新手機台時事台政事台World體育台娛樂台動漫台Apps台遊戲台影視台講故台健康台感情台家庭台潮流台美容台上班台財經台房屋台飲食台旅遊台學術台校園台汽車台音樂台創意台硬件台電器台攝影台玩具台寵物台軟件台活動台電訊台直播台站務台黑 洞