佢強姦完女手足, 話比返錢你就得
有片：有警員問OK 職員 頭先防暴拎左幾多支水 我宜家俾返錢你
馬仔
604 回覆
777 Like
54 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁
黑警就係咁做野
佢強姦完女手足, 話比返錢你就得
佢強姦完女手足, 話比返錢你就得
班黑警當自己邊個？
日本皇軍？
日本皇軍？
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
下次人地搶你槍，比返你又當無事？
再轉頭告你賣淫呀
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
快SD投訴先
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
事後比錢有咩問題
班黑警勁到即使有cam拍緊
都正大光明咁偷野
都正大光明咁偷野
姦完人 可以補返個處女膜 但冇姦過
阿sir一定啱
以後想要咩都去ok了
以後想要咩都去ok了
係呀，你口渴就入去攞黎飲啦，遲下我去幫你俾番錢就得啦
偷完野，之後比返錢就當冇事?
犯法就係犯法 除非你係警察
我以後識後數了
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
推
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
唔怪得咁多popo叫雞