有片：有警員問OK 職員 頭先防暴拎左幾多支水 我宜家俾返錢你
馬仔
604 回覆
777 Like
54 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁
狗屋天台都有狗著孖煙通跑步
Resistance Live Media
【524流水式遊行：警察按倒一名年輕男子後再噴椒、倒不知名液體】
5月24日下午，有市民發起銅鑼灣、灣仔流水式遊行。
下午5點3左右，大批警察在鵝頸橋登龍街位置按倒一名年輕人，仍向他噴椒，再將不知名液體從他頭上倒下來。
文/攝：Siam
【524流水式遊行：警察按倒一名年輕男子後再噴椒、倒不知名液體】
5月24日下午，有市民發起銅鑼灣、灣仔流水式遊行。
下午5點3左右，大批警察在鵝頸橋登龍街位置按倒一名年輕人，仍向他噴椒，再將不知名液體從他頭上倒下來。
文/攝：Siam
無所為！
Send撚爆佢個server
Send撚爆佢個server
曬你老母氣呀
犯法就係犯法
就算估到紅官判無罪
都要搞到黑警一身蟻, 無得升職, 日日失眠
唔搞點知唔得?
犯法就係犯法
就算估到紅官判無罪
都要搞到黑警一身蟻, 無得升職, 日日失眠
唔搞點知唔得?
知唔知pprb全名係咩
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
犯法就係犯法
除非你係_ _
除非你係_ _
知唔知pr可以做形容詞
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
突破盲點
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
樓主
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
可以pin this
加左盜竊罪條例
Ceo@ceo.gov.hk
Com-office@icac.org.hk
Csbcomp@csb.gov.hk
Enquiry@ombudsman.hk
Rc@ops.icac.org.hk
Kwongchunyu@dphk.org
投訴警務人員干犯cap.210盜竊罪條例
敬啟者：
本人從網上片段得知2020年5月24日有警務人員於銅鑼灣強搶私人財產，事態嚴重，本人特此致函，促請有關部門從速從嚴處理。
相關資料如下：
https://twitter.com/williamyang120/status/1264444637709660162?s=21
本人留意到香港警務處在其Facebook專頁狡辯「警方澄清，警方已經向店舖付清相關樽裝飲品的費用。」此澄清即是承認該警員當下一刻並無付款。
本人現嚴肅詢問政府相關部門，如果市民在任何便利店先強行拿取商品享用再留待自己方便時才付費，是否不構成任何犯罪？如否，本人現強烈要求政府相關部門從速從嚴處理該警員的偷竊、爆竊及公職人員行為失當行為，因為該警員的劣等行徑已對香港的自由市場及私有產權構成極大負面影響。
Cap. 210《盜竊罪條例》:
3.Dishonestly (不誠實地)
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
[cf. 1968 c. 60 s. 2 U.K.]
本人要求政府相關部門回應是否會對該警員立即採取紀律行動，包括調查、停薪、停職、革職、迫令退休及檢控。
此致
你個名
偷野比返錢就唔算偷？ 咁唔洗有盜竊罪啦
Push
狗狗咁快出嚟兜 證明呢單嘢值得推
傻閪pprb 成日要幫狗執屎 專業執屎員
今晚去ok拎水飲完再搵人俾返錢
強姦完隻雞再問價
咪係 真係徵用洗鬼畀返錢咩 畀錢即係認錯啦
錯就要負責
邊隻狗搶嘢呀
錯就要負責
邊隻狗搶嘢呀