[賽後檢討] 全球鎂光燈下，點解要掛港英旗，塗鴉主席台，而非展示更有意義的訊息?

我就真係問過人/ 比人問過啦。
唔係做咩要出post?

你講就係？
外媒判斷全部都錯
你啲所謂有人問就好有道理？

因為你係支那臭狗

yes

外國人只係勝利球迷 爭取支持係文宣做 唔係改變自己行動去 please啲外國人

如果現實中，有可能歸英，
掛香港龍獅旗可能正確

但現實中無可能，呢面旗反而會令人問：你支持殖民主義？
模糊焦點。

我亦同意，不自由無寧死 既感染力更大
但呢個係事後孔明

當係賽後檢討囉

OK。你要列子，可以睇下呢篇報導的第3點:

3. A colonial-era flag
A group of protesters draped a British Hong Kong flag on the lectern of the legislature chamber. Few activists in the city actually want to become British colonials again. But the flag is sometimes used to express their unique Hong Kong identity and discontent with Chinese rule after 1997. The appearance of this colonial-era flag at the legislature has sparked heated debate online among the protesters themselves. Opponents of the gesture say it could cause misconceptions and allow the Chinese government to blame local activism on “foreign forces.”

https://www.inkstonenews.com/politics/hong-kong-protests-why-activists-put-british-colonial-flag-legislative-council/article/3016908

例子

Opponents of the gesture say it could cause misconceptions and allow the Chinese government to blame local activism on “foreign forces.”

你以為quote英文嚇到人?
反對理由原來係驚俾支共話有外國勢力

咁唔通喺支共角度我地BNO全部都係外國勢力

義士係做得好好, 但如果要諗點做得更好, 不如諗下如果有人問同你一樣既問題:
1. 點解要掛港英旗
2. 點解要塗鴉主席台
有啲野既然做左, 咁最緊要既係點話比人知咁做係合理, 下次既事, 下一步先諗 (因為唔係會唔會有下次)

第一，出得黎大家都係兄弟姊妹，不割席，各有各做。
第二，因為已經做左。
第三，你又做過D咩先？