假如628各地報紙都見到公開信？
Caca笑
901 回覆
2646 Like
13 Dislike
第 1 頁第 2 頁第 3 頁第 4 頁第 5 頁第 6 頁第 7 頁第 8 頁第 9 頁第 10 頁第 11 頁第 12 頁第 13 頁第 14 頁第 15 頁第 16 頁第 17 頁第 18 頁第 19 頁第 20 頁第 21 頁第 22 頁第 23 頁第 24 頁第 25 頁第 26 頁第 27 頁第 28 頁第 29 頁第 30 頁第 31 頁第 32 頁第 33 頁第 34 頁第 35 頁第 36 頁第 37 頁
所以依家唔會集資，只投稿睇編輯登唔登，你可以放心。
幫推
大家嘅想法都勝於我，但最惹人爭議嘅資金問題搞唔掂嘛
登要快
要時間
要時間
英國奶強国雪雪聲
咪鬼理佢
咪鬼理佢
推
推呀
28，29集中番日本
仲有應該28前可以係美 日 德 台登，等各國知乜事
仲有應該28前可以係美 日 德 台登，等各國知乜事
我覺得最主要係登new york times
最世界所有人都會睇nyt，我相信就算係國家元首，佢地自己同佢條team點都會睇nyt
最世界所有人都會睇nyt，我相信就算係國家元首，佢地自己同佢條team點都會睇nyt
其他報章無咁重要
push
推呀
26，27號登最理想
各國領導人睇到 會內閣傾下先
28，29號就登番日本本土
各國領導人睇到 會內閣傾下先
28，29號就登番日本本土
GSTQ巴打的公開信：
Open letter from Hong Konger to the free world:
When the eyes of the world were on Hong Kong 22 years ago, barely anyone of us could have ever expected this. The free world, particularly us, were convinced that China would keep its promises of an UN registered treaty with Britain. We were indeed worried about our sovereignty being handed over to a totalitarian state but we had very little help, or power to save ourselves from a monstrous regime. International attentions are only hope to defend our liberty in a total-ideological war, fuelled by Leninism which we thought it was dead in 1991, mobilising racial-nationalist state machine.
We are no longer the same ever since. We changed, but not in an aggressive or invasive way. Since we realised the desire of keeping the promises vanished, we decided to give up our stable, comfortable lives and take it to the street. We tried with every effort to resolve the differences in a peaceful, reasonable way, unfortunately it has been in vain. It was the doctrine that suggest might is right and despise the value of democracy and liberty that we all cherished. As Hong Kong remain standing, we will defend it with our lives. However, we do not how much time we have got as the erosion of the system supposed to protect our vales increasing deepen by day. Hong Kong as the frontier of the free market economy, cannot afford to lose the battle. This is not only our battle, but also the free world.
The ultimate issue is that if such doctrine is established, the order of the free world will be defeated, economies will become chaotic and humanity will fall into abyss. With the relentless support of our international allies, the battle has been prolonged as it never should have. We have paid for our naiveness, and we are still suffering until the battle is over. It is a critical moment of free world to decide whether to close the battle swiftly or to watch large tracts of the world fall into the exploitation by Leninism. As a coastline city of continental Asia with no power of self-defence, we cannot find another possible way out except seeking help to the free world. If this message fail to send, this should serve as our last post to the world.
Best,
Hong Konger
Open letter from Hong Konger to the free world:
When the eyes of the world were on Hong Kong 22 years ago, barely anyone of us could have ever expected this. The free world, particularly us, were convinced that China would keep its promises of an UN registered treaty with Britain. We were indeed worried about our sovereignty being handed over to a totalitarian state but we had very little help, or power to save ourselves from a monstrous regime. International attentions are only hope to defend our liberty in a total-ideological war, fuelled by Leninism which we thought it was dead in 1991, mobilising racial-nationalist state machine.
We are no longer the same ever since. We changed, but not in an aggressive or invasive way. Since we realised the desire of keeping the promises vanished, we decided to give up our stable, comfortable lives and take it to the street. We tried with every effort to resolve the differences in a peaceful, reasonable way, unfortunately it has been in vain. It was the doctrine that suggest might is right and despise the value of democracy and liberty that we all cherished. As Hong Kong remain standing, we will defend it with our lives. However, we do not how much time we have got as the erosion of the system supposed to protect our vales increasing deepen by day. Hong Kong as the frontier of the free market economy, cannot afford to lose the battle. This is not only our battle, but also the free world.
The ultimate issue is that if such doctrine is established, the order of the free world will be defeated, economies will become chaotic and humanity will fall into abyss. With the relentless support of our international allies, the battle has been prolonged as it never should have. We have paid for our naiveness, and we are still suffering until the battle is over. It is a critical moment of free world to decide whether to close the battle swiftly or to watch large tracts of the world fall into the exploitation by Leninism. As a coastline city of continental Asia with no power of self-defence, we cannot find another possible way out except seeking help to the free world. If this message fail to send, this should serve as our last post to the world.
Best,
Hong Konger
就算有個人 肯做
都易出事
因為而家中共玩清算 唔可以個人帶頭
錢事小 比人清算 比港共中共砌生豬肉
有排坐
都易出事
因為而家中共玩清算 唔可以個人帶頭
錢事小 比人清算 比港共中共砌生豬肉
有排坐
行動組寫的公開信：
Dear All,
We are ordinary citizens from Hong Kong, the only Chinese city where the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre is still commemorated every year. Our liberal future is doomed, though, unless we get your support before the G20 Summit meeting.
Since the Summit is to be held this Friday, the local government has paused its witch hunt, as its earlier violent crackdown on peaceful protesters had embarrassed Chinese President Xi Jinping. His US counterpart Donald Trump will meet Xi and raise the issue. But this shield will fade soon. If the two leaders strike a deal, Hong Kong’s fate risks being ignored. A worse crackdown, both physical and institutional, may then follow.
The protests stemmed from the public's opposition to the government’s plan to allow suspects to be sent to mainland China for trial. This prospect has worried the grassroots, professionals and chambers of commerce across the Atlantic alike. They fear the breakdown of the “firewall” between the two jurisdictions, which has separated the common-law practicing Hong Kong from the rest of China.
The government ignored the ire, though. On 9 June 2019, after a million citizens marched, the government insisted that debate of the bill be resumed in three days’ time.
Without a choice, on 12 June 2019, tens of thousands of people occupied the streets to deny legislators access to the chamber. In response, the police dispersed the crowds with violence unseen for decades. Peaceful protesters were attacked with tear gas, rubber bullets, and beanbag shots, which Amnesty International later found “unnecessary” and “excessive”. Hundreds of them, including journalists, were injured, some critically.
The injured, however, were denied treatment. The police obstructed ambulances. Worse, many of the wounded avoided medical help, fearing arrests in hospitals. Later, a doctor confirmed that the police could access a hospital system which indicated patients’ attendance of “mass gatherings”.
For those arrested, the charges include “rioting”. The implication is stark, as convicts are subject to 10 years imprisonment. The use of such an ordinance has been slammed by former Hong Kong governor Chris Patten for infringing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The same night, the chief executive Carrie Lam refused to budge in her televised speech. This caught worldwide attention. US congressmen touted reintroduction of Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act. Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, called the protests a “beautiful sight to behold” and hinted at reassessment of the special status US conferred on Hong Kong.
Only three days later did Lam try to reduce the tension, probably because her act had recklessly given Washington an edge in its negotiation with Beijing, which was not pleased. That said, while she promised suspension of the bill, she fell short of withdrawing it, or retracting her description of the protest as a riot.
Currently, the police have restrained itself. This will not last. The government’s thinking is that once the G20 summit is over, international scrutiny does not matter. It may then restart its mass campaign of arrests, aimed at silencing and revenging on Hong Kong citizens. Worse, the bill may get reintroduced, as a pro-government figure hinted. But at that time, we may lose completely.
Against such a background, if we wish to have our humble demands - withdrawal of the bill, setting up of an independent commission, and refraining from prosecuting peaceful protesters - met, they are to be achieved before the G20 meeting, or never.
We desperately need urgent help. We sincerely hope that you stand with us and voice your support before we become another victim in the global trend of democratic recession.
Yours truly,
Freedom-loving Hong Kong citizens
Dear All,
We are ordinary citizens from Hong Kong, the only Chinese city where the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre is still commemorated every year. Our liberal future is doomed, though, unless we get your support before the G20 Summit meeting.
Since the Summit is to be held this Friday, the local government has paused its witch hunt, as its earlier violent crackdown on peaceful protesters had embarrassed Chinese President Xi Jinping. His US counterpart Donald Trump will meet Xi and raise the issue. But this shield will fade soon. If the two leaders strike a deal, Hong Kong’s fate risks being ignored. A worse crackdown, both physical and institutional, may then follow.
The protests stemmed from the public's opposition to the government’s plan to allow suspects to be sent to mainland China for trial. This prospect has worried the grassroots, professionals and chambers of commerce across the Atlantic alike. They fear the breakdown of the “firewall” between the two jurisdictions, which has separated the common-law practicing Hong Kong from the rest of China.
The government ignored the ire, though. On 9 June 2019, after a million citizens marched, the government insisted that debate of the bill be resumed in three days’ time.
Without a choice, on 12 June 2019, tens of thousands of people occupied the streets to deny legislators access to the chamber. In response, the police dispersed the crowds with violence unseen for decades. Peaceful protesters were attacked with tear gas, rubber bullets, and beanbag shots, which Amnesty International later found “unnecessary” and “excessive”. Hundreds of them, including journalists, were injured, some critically.
The injured, however, were denied treatment. The police obstructed ambulances. Worse, many of the wounded avoided medical help, fearing arrests in hospitals. Later, a doctor confirmed that the police could access a hospital system which indicated patients’ attendance of “mass gatherings”.
For those arrested, the charges include “rioting”. The implication is stark, as convicts are subject to 10 years imprisonment. The use of such an ordinance has been slammed by former Hong Kong governor Chris Patten for infringing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The same night, the chief executive Carrie Lam refused to budge in her televised speech. This caught worldwide attention. US congressmen touted reintroduction of Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act. Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, called the protests a “beautiful sight to behold” and hinted at reassessment of the special status US conferred on Hong Kong.
Only three days later did Lam try to reduce the tension, probably because her act had recklessly given Washington an edge in its negotiation with Beijing, which was not pleased. That said, while she promised suspension of the bill, she fell short of withdrawing it, or retracting her description of the protest as a riot.
Currently, the police have restrained itself. This will not last. The government’s thinking is that once the G20 summit is over, international scrutiny does not matter. It may then restart its mass campaign of arrests, aimed at silencing and revenging on Hong Kong citizens. Worse, the bill may get reintroduced, as a pro-government figure hinted. But at that time, we may lose completely.
Against such a background, if we wish to have our humble demands - withdrawal of the bill, setting up of an independent commission, and refraining from prosecuting peaceful protesters - met, they are to be achieved before the G20 meeting, or never.
We desperately need urgent help. We sincerely hope that you stand with us and voice your support before we become another victim in the global trend of democratic recession.
Yours truly,
Freedom-loving Hong Kong citizens
PUSH
New York Times 一頁要美金＄150000，頭版唔清楚。
不過呢個idea好好呀！！！
不過呢個idea好好呀！！！
錢唔係問題
怕趕唔切
推俾更多人睇到先
怕趕唔切
推俾更多人睇到先
行動組另一封公開信2⃣️：
Dear All,
We are ordinary citizens from Hong Kong, the international city renowned for its free economy and civil freedom despite being part of China. Our liberal future is doomed, though, unless we do something before the G20 Summit meeting.
It was the amendments to the fugitive ordinance proposed in May. The law potentially allowed the Hong Kong government to send suspects requested by China without going through Hong Kong’s judicial procedures. A lot of our citizens (at least 2 millions of 7 millions!) feared the law would break down the “firewall” between us and China, which is notorious for its translucent, unfair and pro-government judicial system.
Such a law poses white terror upon us and any one of you who is residing, and would be residing in Hong Kong. Even if you were here just for business. This also translates to less investments in Hong Kong. The city loses its main income source and the world loses a profitable free market.
We could not stop the bill from entering our law book. Flawed legislative council structure ensures vote results almost always leaned towards the pro-government sector; a 1-million-people protest in on June 9th failed to budge the non-representative government. They only reported to China. We had no choice.
Darker days came after the protest on 12 June. The police fired teargas and rubber bullets at protestors and reporters alike. Several were severely hurt. One took it in the eye; one lost consciousness. A lot of arrested with no convincing evidence. It was inconceivable the police would use excessive force in a peaceful protest.
It was not a surprise the death of a protestor on June 15 and a 2-million-people protest on June 16 still couldn’t move this openly hostile government.
Therefore we need your help. All of you in the world. Let the Hong Kong government know the power of the free world. Voice your concerns. The G20 Summit is tomorrow. Ask your president to speak up on this matter. It would then be possible to pressure President Xi of China and the Hong Kong government. Your efforts might just be the tipping force to win this match - China cannot afford to look bad at the height of a trade war.
We only wish these humble wishes:
1. Withdrawal of the amendment;
2. Setting up of an independent commission to investigate police’s possible use of excessive force;
3. Promises from Hong Kong government not to prosecute peaceful protesters;
Support us. Fight against the global trend of democratic recession. Together, we defend our freedom!
Yours sincerely,
Freedom-loving Hong Kong citizens
Dear All,
We are ordinary citizens from Hong Kong, the international city renowned for its free economy and civil freedom despite being part of China. Our liberal future is doomed, though, unless we do something before the G20 Summit meeting.
It was the amendments to the fugitive ordinance proposed in May. The law potentially allowed the Hong Kong government to send suspects requested by China without going through Hong Kong’s judicial procedures. A lot of our citizens (at least 2 millions of 7 millions!) feared the law would break down the “firewall” between us and China, which is notorious for its translucent, unfair and pro-government judicial system.
Such a law poses white terror upon us and any one of you who is residing, and would be residing in Hong Kong. Even if you were here just for business. This also translates to less investments in Hong Kong. The city loses its main income source and the world loses a profitable free market.
We could not stop the bill from entering our law book. Flawed legislative council structure ensures vote results almost always leaned towards the pro-government sector; a 1-million-people protest in on June 9th failed to budge the non-representative government. They only reported to China. We had no choice.
Darker days came after the protest on 12 June. The police fired teargas and rubber bullets at protestors and reporters alike. Several were severely hurt. One took it in the eye; one lost consciousness. A lot of arrested with no convincing evidence. It was inconceivable the police would use excessive force in a peaceful protest.
It was not a surprise the death of a protestor on June 15 and a 2-million-people protest on June 16 still couldn’t move this openly hostile government.
Therefore we need your help. All of you in the world. Let the Hong Kong government know the power of the free world. Voice your concerns. The G20 Summit is tomorrow. Ask your president to speak up on this matter. It would then be possible to pressure President Xi of China and the Hong Kong government. Your efforts might just be the tipping force to win this match - China cannot afford to look bad at the height of a trade war.
We only wish these humble wishes:
1. Withdrawal of the amendment;
2. Setting up of an independent commission to investigate police’s possible use of excessive force;
3. Promises from Hong Kong government not to prosecute peaceful protesters;
Support us. Fight against the global trend of democratic recession. Together, we defend our freedom!
Yours sincerely,
Freedom-loving Hong Kong citizens
Push
巴打你明白就好，希望其他巴𢇃都諒解。
推