Samsung S10 螢幕超聲波指紋感應器輕易被破解！

早前 Samsung S10 的人像解鎖功能被照片輕易騙倒，只要拿機主的照片出來，非常容易就解鎖。那麼其最新的螢幕超聲波指紋感應器又會否是安全的選擇呢？看來未必如此理想。



名為 darkshark 的用戶在 Imgur 貼出以 3D 打印方式，花了 13 分鐘就完成一個 3D 打印的指紋膜，從而破解 S10 的螢幕解鎖功能。

整個流程是先在酒瓶上的留下指紋，然後將指紋拍照後放到 Photoshop 作圖像處理，然後放任 3D Studio Max 將 2D 指紋 3D 化，再用 3D 打印機列印成指紋膜。


超聲波指紋感應器

其實，Galaxy S10 的螢幕內置的是「超聲波指紋感應器」，可讀取用戶物理指紋的 3D 輪廓，而非僅限於 2D 圖像，以提升辨識能力。官方表示新一代的生物辨識身份驗證作為世界上第一款通過 FIDO 聯盟生物辨識組件認證（Alliance Biometric Component Certification），可提供超聲波安全解鎖，以確保客戶的裝置安全。





https://www.newmobilelife.com/2019/04/08/s10-finger-print-3d-printing-crack/?utm_content=buffer104f0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

整個流程是先在酒瓶上的留下指紋，然後將指紋拍照後放到 Photoshop 作圖像處理，然後放任 3D Studio Max 將 2D 指紋 3D 化，再用 3D 打印機列印成指紋膜。


真係好撚輕易

面孔解鎖都輕易破解，只需要證件相3D化再3D打印

真係好輕易 多謝為沉悶星期一提供笑話一則

hardware問題
三叔呢期算係創新
但係用硬推出黎既科技

三星

屌用3d指紋辨識都咁易被破解

冇可能，我自己隻手指都解唔開

見到呢段真係笑咗出嚟
呢個垃圾網真係biased到仆街

只要你跌左電話 成部手機都係你既拍紋
拎去PS 3d打印 3個字時間就入到部機

Face ID又贏

流動日報真係垃圾中既垃圾

idog飛機post你地都咁在意

複製咗隻手指出嚟實得啦

好出奇? fingerprint.png

face id雙胞胎解到，連完全唔似樣嘅都解到你想idog點打飛機
原來樓主係專打idog嘅

根本仲向fingerprint方向行都on9, 用an機都係咁話

某D打手不願面對就話人地飛機post
又唔見touchid 出左咁耐
到人地而家Apple都唔用都無咁易出事

face id唔似樣都解到某打手駁唔到喎

https://www.newmobilelife.com/2016/03/01/crack-iphone-6s-touch-id-with-play-doh/

俾返呢個垃圾網俾你睇
只可以講而家未有一種係安全過密碼
自己衡量返風險啦

然後佢話你考古

早兩日見到英文報導
都諗緊幾時有on9拎黎煲
人地講到明
How did the hacker break the scanner?

The truth is that nothing went wrong as far as the scanner is concerned, it did its job as intended. Unfortunately, the researcher (going by the name of darkshark9) was able to
1 use a photograph of his fingerprint from a wine glass and,
2 using Photoshop, create an alpha mask from it.
3This mask was then exported to 3ds Max software in order to create a geometry displacement to get a highly-detailed and raised 3D model.
4 It was then just a matter of printing that model from his AnyCubic Photon LCD resin printer which has an accuracy-level down to 10 microns. This ensured all the ridges of the fingerprint were properly rendered. The time to print was 13 minutes, after which the resulting fake fingerprint opened the Galaxy S10 every time.

I said earlier that the hacker had fooled the scanner, but actually this isn’t really the case as the cloned fingerprint is exactly the same as the original so the scanner was recognizing that which it had been instructed to.

鬼唔知無一種係安全過密碼咩
但係估唔到只要有心，
一般人都破到你呢個手指紋
有D野衰左就要認
好似Apple定價太高一樣